JUMP TO HOME PAGE

 

 

OPEN LETTER TO GOV.GEN.(CANADA)– OCT.01-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS and PMO)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employeescasecanada.com (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' teacher lay-off) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 9 different court systems and over 30 judges. It's Canada’s Watergate - Pulitzer Prize winning author being sought. The 'find me a court' plea has fallen on deaf ears due to Registry, Ministry & Court obfuscation. 'Standing Cases' are a rare commodity; in this one a challenge to the entire Canadian judiciary.  I feel like Ralph Nader in 1961 trying to convince the public of dangerous cars (Unsafe at any speed). Who knows, maybe recalling judges and chief judges may become standard fare in the future - just like automobiles. To be sure, the current system is not working as now the Canadian Justice System has been shattered in its entirety by this case. The current case in Federal Court (T-2360-14) alleges fraud on behalf of the Respondent West Vancouver,B.C.  Employer and Union plus the court processes over the past 30 years. It would appear that the Respondents misrepresented themselves to this petitioner as to the their authority. #550-17008208-157 currently extant in Gatineau, Quebec, will see if the French Canadian courts suffer from this 'English disease'. Premier P. Couillard is being kept fully informed as to court progress as well as, now, the Quebec RCMP.  Sask. QBG 1902/15 (H.D. Sept. 24) has, as its focus, the ultra vires nature of BILL 35 as 'current demonstrated ability' is undefined in the Act or in law in general hence anything flowing from it is 'null and void'. The SK court did not order up the 'missing memo notes' (minutes of School Trustees meetings in June of 1985 where they heard from gov't officials on all aspects of BILL 35) from Justice Southin (1986) which holds the key to this government fraud. (SK decision pending as is the procrastinating Que. Court with its focus solely on those 'missing link' notes.

 

Legal Precedents set by the Employee's Case

1) Any employer may break the contract rules and deny salary to any employee (West Vancouver School Trustee 'Final Solution') while contesting a dismissal. The back of the Union Movement is broken with that condition as now the 'sweetheart deal' has been sanctioned by the legal system. Recently Ottawa Police Chief Bordeleau is contemplating that manoeuvre.

2) Any judge may act apart from the laws of the country and expect to escape censure. Every court hearing this matter is complicit by not challenging the B.C. 'Justice Cullen Creed'. The Harper Government would seek to deprive Canadian citizens (does not include 'dual citizenship) of their citizenship for acts of terrorism...what's next?...to deprive whistleblowers of court access as per the Employee's Case?

3) 'No legal answer' is now 'a legal answer' which places an end to the credibility of the Canadian Justice System and makes Parliament and the anti-employee media redundant.

 

LETTER TO THE 'INCOMING' MINISTER OF JUSTICE

1) It matters little which political party forms the next government as all four leaders have failed to acknowledge the Employee's Case; the lead case in Canadian civil jurisprudence in which the Justice System is in a state of collapse due to systematic judicial abuse in this 30 year unresolved labour issue where no compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid.

2) Whether a Liberal (hopefully not the duplicitous David McGuinty -my M.P.- brother of former ON Premier, Dalton McGuinty, now in hiding) or an NDP (Paul Dewar wants a new code for the civil service. Why? He never spoke out under the 'old' code.) or a Tory ( whom will no doubt pass retroactive legislation (anarchy) making such as the 'Cullen Creed' the order of the day as per the whitewashing of criminal charges against the RCMP for illicitly destroying gun registry information);... you are on your own particularly as the incumbent Governor General seems fit for little more than handing out pretty awards.

3) Your first Order of business is to assign a Ministry Official to sorting out the debacle euphemistically known as the employeescasecanada.com with the concomitant second Order NOT to take the oath of office if you don't.

4) First up to be batted out of the ballpark is SCofC Beverley McLachlin ; not specifically for her role in this case with the SCofC, rather for her indolence as President of the Canadian Judicial Council which has never acknowledged serious complaints that I have made against judges.

5) Second one up is Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton whom, if he does not put

T-2360-14 back on track for a hearing before a judge in Ottawa, should also share McLachlin's fate. A jump-the-gun Vancouver Prothonotary  in a secret hearing is no substitute for 'due process' as the substantiated charge of fraud made by this plaintiff is hardly 'frivolous'.

6) Indeed, remove the term 'frivolous and vexatious' in its entirety from the legal code as no-one launches a case for which they can be dunned for all legal expenses.

7) The above case has been analyzed entirely (T-2360-14) through the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) focusing, as it does, on human rights as well as through the traditional rights from the BNA Act of 1867 focusing on private property. The whole system should be re-written to incorporate both sets of law. (And I have not even dealt with Registry obfuscations.)

8) The problem with the original laws is that they have been modified so often that the usual outcome is to add this rider '...unless the presiding justice decides otherwise....'. Please note that even with this allowance, judges assigned to this case have abused their powers extensively and in some cases without any effective overview. In general, overview committees are weaker than the bureaucracies that they would oversee.

9) The Employee's Case marks the end of the role of the individual in Canadian Society as well as witnessing the ascension of the credibility of the internet over that of the anti-employee media as exemplified by the Federal Election on October 19-2015  PLACARD: THE EMPLOYEE'S CASE IS THE ELECTION ISSUE for what is the point of passing laws which no-one obeys including government? PLACARD: WHY OBEY THE LAW? JUDGES DON'T.

 

Yours truly,  'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System' (Roger Callow)

 

cc GANG OF 4 (HARPER/MULCAIR/TRUDEAU/MAY)   / GOVERNOR GENERAL

 

OPEN LETTER TO GOV.GEN. (CANADA)–OCT.11-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS and PMO)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

 BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employeescasecanada.com (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' teacher lay-off) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 9 different court systems and over 30 judges. It's Canada’s Watergate - Pulitzer Prize winning author being sought. The 'find me a court' plea has fallen on deaf ears due to Registry, Ministry & Court obfuscation. 'Standing Cases' are a rare commodity; in this one a challenge to the entire Canadian judiciary.  I feel like Ralph Nader in 1961 trying to convince the public of dangerous cars (Unsafe at any speed). Who knows, maybe recalling judges and chief judges may become standard fare in the future - just like automobiles. To be sure, the current system is not working as now the Canadian Justice System has been shattered in its entirety by this case. The current case in Federal Court (T-2360-14) alleges fraud on behalf of the Respondent West Vancouver,B.C.  Employer and Union plus the court processes over the past 30 years. It would appear that the Respondents misrepresented themselves to this petitioner as to the their authority. #550-17008208-157 currently extant in Gatineau, Quebec, will see if the French Canadian courts suffer from this 'English disease'. Premier P. Couillard is being kept fully informed as to court progress as well as, now, the Quebec RCMP.  Sask. 2015-SKQB-308 (H.D. Sept. 24) has, as its focus, the ultra vires nature of BILL 35 as 'current demonstrated ability' is undefined in the Act or in law in general hence anything flowing from it is 'null and void'. The SK court did not order up the 'missing memo notes' (minutes of School Trustees meetings in June of 1985 where they heard from gov't officials on all aspects of BILL 35) from Justice Southin (1986) which hold the key to this government fraud. The SK decision to duck out for jurisdictional reasons is being appealed. The procrastinating Que. Court with its focus solely on those 'missing link' notes is in limbo.

ANATOMY OF A SK JUDICIAL FRAUD

SK Chief Justice M.D. Popescul & Premier B. Wall kept fully informed

(see web under the above heading for appeal (M.T. Megaw j.) detailing rules of inherent jurisdiction & natural justice (as a must read for anyone dealing with those 2 terms)

 

1) The SK court in QBG 2015-SKQB-308 has decided to throw in their lot with the conspirators in this 30 year unresolved B.C. labour issue where no compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid. 9 separate courts later (including two rejected approaches to the Supreme Court of Canada and over 30 judges would keep this litigant 'sailing on a sea of red tape' never to put into the 'port of judgment'. That's anarchy.

 

2) Recently, A Quebec judge shocked 10 prosecutors when he released 5 Hell's Angels from murder charges. Why? Because the crown concealed vital information for 4 years. The Employee's Case has run for 30 years in which the Employer and Courts have concealed the vital 'missing link' notes of West Vancouver School Board meetings in June of 1985 where government officials and legal counsel discussed the imposed BILL 35 used only against this party before it was later withdrawn leaving this laid-off senior teacher in limbo.

 

 

 

FEDERAL ELECTION - OCT. 19 - 2015 (I told you so!)

 

1) Near the end of August, I asked a group of people of various Party interests from Quebec and Ontario, 'Who will win the election?'

2) The Tories, they chorused. I was the only one to say the Liberals.

3) My prognostication was based on the current riding map which showed little change from the 2011 election; the key being that the '905 vote' outside Toronto voted Tory in order to keep NDP's Jack Layton from becoming Prime  Minister.

4) I submitted that history would repeat itself; only this time the 905 vote would vote Liberal to keep the NDP out once again.

5) Voting patterns have changed from the old days when people voted according to family history for the most part to a much more fluid pattern which has dumbfounded the political pundits whose speculations have been widely off in recent years.

6) Without elections, the media pundits would be out of work hence a deliberate program of creating  controversy  in order to 'turn out the vote' which explains in large part why my PLACARD: DONT' VOTE...BESIDES, IT ONLY ENCOURAGES THEM upsets them no end.

7) A second PLACARD explains my stand: WHY PASS LAWS WHEN THE JUDGES DISOBEY THEM?

8) Without an efficacious Judiciary, there can be no democratic country: PLACARD:

GEE, CANADA JUST LIKE CHINA...COURTS BUT NO JUSTICE

9) In the above regard, the 30 year unresolved - employeescasecanada.com before over 9 separate court systems and over 30 judges in a matter of systematic judicial abuse has reduced Canada to Third World status in 2004 when this targeted senior teacher lay-off victim was left in limbo by the Supreme Court of Canada by failing to hear an appeal in this 'standing case'.

10) Recent legal peregrinations from 2010 onward to the current day have reduced Canada from Third World status to that of a Fourth World entity.

11) The de facto legal situation was to make 'no legal answer to be a legal answer'. That's anarchy. No media source has dared to see fit to break the boycott on this, the major sleeper issue in 21st century  Canada. The internet has now surpassed the Canadian media in credibility.

ELECTION FOIBLES

12) The Tory Party appeals to the few rich and influential as well as those who aspire to be associated with them of whose numbers are legion; in Canada's case approximately 30% with no room to grow. They are able to rule due to a central- left wing split .

13) Being the incumbent government, the shorter the election writ the better (which the Tories decided to forego) as they are on the defensive (which Harper has handled reasonably well ): PLACARD: HARPER: TOO MANY MISTAKES PLUS BAD APPOINTMENTS. It would seem that far too many of those Tories who aspire to success are not dealing 'with a full deck'; something they would most assiduously reject...explaining  Harper's reclusiveness.

14) Poor Thomas Mulcair has carried the ball in Parliament criticizing the Tories only to see the Liberals reap the rewards. It's the 'sizzle' not the 'steak' which sells or, as any marketer knows; the inventor comes off second.

15) Mulcair's early commitment  to do anything to oust the Tories guaranteed Liberal success as either a minority or majority government. The Liberals announced a similar policy once it was clear that they were leading the NDP hence Mulcair's action robbed him of his 'slam dunk' advantage by peaking too early.

16) Strike 3 for the NDP was the public 'anyone but Harper' grass movements  which Mulcair initiated which saw NDP support wither away with the ascension of the Liberals.

17) What's to come? In 1991, the NDP government of Bob Rae (now a Federal Liberal) in Ontario inherited a government 'with a small surplus' which turned out to be a 5 billion dollar deficit. Extrapolate that scene to the Federal government and the horror the Tories must have of being exposed on that level. Forget the figures quoted by government factotums; we are as adversely affected by economic events as all other countries in the world. Watch China (Li Ka Shing, the richest man in Asia, pulled his investments from China and relocated in the Bahamas with his money flowing to Europe) for as China goes, so do a lot of economies explaining the desire of North America, Mexico, Chile, Oceania, and Japan to resist that implosion with the economic TPP. (P.S. On a personal note, I exited the stock market at the end of June.)

THE ABOVE ACCOUNT WAS WRITTEN ON OCTOBER 6-2015

 

October 22-2015

Complaints Counsel
#1100 - 2002 Victoria Avenue
Regina SK   S4P 0R7
complaints@lawsociety.sk.ca  by fax (306) 352-2989. 4 pages including this one

FROM:

Roger Callow

208-2220 Halifax Drive

Ottawa, Ontario K1G 2W7

 

REFERENCE: CACV2783 Appeal of  QBG 1902/15 H.D. Sept. 24-2015  Megaw j.

 

COMPLAINT:

1) In court by teleconferencing on September 24, 2015, I drew the courts attention to an egregious inclusion by B.C. Legal Counsel, G. Litherland of Harris & Co. for the Board of School Trustees (West Vancouver S.D. #45).

2)That inclusion is summarized in the Appeal as follows: (letter to WVST Oct. 20-2015 included here) 6) Is it wise to use B.C. Counsel in Saskatchewan where they are not licensed to practice law although a dispensation could be sought? Further, the particular B.C. Counsel the Board would use is complicit in the charges of fraud extant in Federal Court T-2360-14. A further recommendation was made to the court by me to censure the Board's representative for falsifying information relating to the Ontario Superior Court's Williamson-Scott j. actions in which Hicks Morley et al dropped representation of the Employer. For that matter, can the Respondent even get legal assistance in SK? At any rate, the WVST must acquire new legal representation for the Appeal if they are to retain any credibility.

3) Regrettably, the court under Megaw j. saw fit to endorse this Ontario ruling in passing with no reference to the alleged perfidy of the Respondent as I requested.

(Litherland, rather than include the McKinnon Order of April 23-2014, included only a second bastardized account of Sept. 15-2015 never seen by this writer and used as the basis in an ensuing hearing by Ontario Superior Court's  Scott j. whom failed to file a judgment although his 'bench notes' mysteriously appeared in the Respondent's factum. This whole legal debacle has been forwarded to the oversight committees concerned.)

4) The pattern followed by a number of other courts  over the past 30 years (B.C./ Supreme Court of Canada/ Federal Court of Canada/ Ontario Courts/ Quebec court procrastination/ is to define this case in very narrow parameters such as 'frivolous and vexatious' or 'lack of jurisdiction'.

5) The constitutional challenges such as a) judges acting completely apart from the law  b) does imposed government legislation (BILL 35) supplant such as the collective bargaining rules when it is not explicitly stated?  c) Is a client to be deprived of court access in face of a 'sweetheart deal' where the courts only recognize the Employer and the Union?  At any rate, none of these vital questions can be labeled 'frivolous and vexatious'.

6) As to Jurisdiction, the rules are open-ended although judges in this particular case have been, it is asserted here, 'cherry-picking' insignificant rules over significant rules in order to escape their responsibilities. The Employer launched a case in Ontario, for example, (McKinnon j.) to discuss all issues which I certainly did not object to where the question of jurisdiction on the part of the Employer was never challenged.  B.C., the source of this labour case, never challenged either the right of the Respondent Employer nor myself as Plaintiff on the grounds of jurisdiction (even though I am a resident of Ontario for the past 25 years) until I was expelled from the B.C. judiciary in 2010 (McKenzie Creed) and 2013 (Cullen Creed) for reasons 'best known to the judges'.

7) The notion of 'natural justice' which Megaw j. disposed from my factum as laughable is a serious disservice to the comport of justice in Canada and a direct reflection on the government of Premier Brad Wall whom has been kept advised of court progression here.

8) Cynically speaking, the Megaw j. Decision, similar to other court Decisions, appears to parallel the same format of other courts convincing this writer that a conspiracy exists in which an 'eminence grise' with access to the back doors of all the Offices of the Chief Justices is able to orchestrate these very similar outcomes in which legalities supplant any recognition of the very important issues involved.

9) As SK is the first Appeal to break lower court machinations of over 5 separate court systems whereby this Appellant is within a 'stone's throw of a Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) challenge - for a third time (the only court so constituted to examine all features of this 30 year unresolved legal debacle from which no compensation has been paid), the question remains as to whether the conspirators have decided to block an Appeal at the level of the SCofC. Of course, in that process, the conspirators would have to sacrifice the Justice System of SK in its entirety. Will Premier Brad Wall stand for that?

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow

 

cc Governor General D. Johnston / 'Incoming' Justice Minister & P.M.Trudeau

SCofC Hon. S. Cô

QUEBEC: D. Goulet j. / Premier Couillard / RCMP

SASKATCHEWAN: Chief Justice M. Popescul / Premier Wall / NDP Cam Broton / Regina Leader-Post

CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL (Hon. B. McLachlin President - never replies)

West Vancouver School Trustees

 

OCTOBER 20-2015 (Sent to WVST on Oct. 14-2015)

 

TO: Board of School Trustees (S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.)

1075-21st Street, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 4A9

tel: 604-981-1000   fax: 604-981-1001                                       SENT BY FAX

 

FROM: Roger Callow  208-2220 Halifax Drive, Ottawa, ON   K1G 2W7

fax: 613-521-1739

REFERENCE: APPEAL  CACV 2783 of  SK Queen's Bench 2015 SKQB 308

MESSAGE:

 1) No doubt you are aware of the Appeal of SKQB 308. The substance of that Appeal may be viewed on my blog: employeescasecanada.com

ANATOMY OF A SK JUDICIAL FRAUD

 

2) Two major omissions are noted in the above: A) the 'missing memo notes'  B) A detailed definition of inherent jurisdiction and natural justice of which both the Respondent and the courts would ignore in place of a narrow interpretation of SK rules of jurisdiction (even here, the court 'cherrypicked' their answer).

 

3) In the case of A), a number of courts have been taxed with A). Indeed, the hearing in Quebec (decision pending for some time now) focuses entirely on these missing memo notes in the hands of your legal counsel whom steadfastly refuses to pass them to me with the courts equally steadfastly refusing to order that this key evidence of West Vancouver School Trustee meetings in June of 1985 be produced wherein BILL 35 was extensively discussed along with the lay-off of senior teacher, Roger Callow. Those memo notes hold the genesis of the accusations of fraud against both the original conspirators and the subsequent judicial cover-up filed in Federal Court T-2360-14. Without that evidence, nothing can be written by any court with any degree of credibility.

 

4) The simple response is for the WVST to voluntarily hand that information over to this party, if only to avoid the considerable embarrassment in this matter to the courts (although I do not excuse them on that accord). If the WVST had included that information as requested by this plaintiff in 2004 under the Freedom of Access laws (as they should have); legalities since that time would have taken, I submit, a most drastic turn away from the systematic  judicial abuse that this litigant has been exposed to in the ensuing years right up to the present

 

5) The key to a registered Appeal is the route to a Supreme Court of Canada challenge remains open, the only court fully qualified to examine all aspects of this unresolved legal case. To date, other Appeal Courts (4 with one pending in Quebec) have managed to thwart appeals through (deliberate) bureaucratic bungling.

 

6) Is it wise to use B.C. Counsel in Saskatchewan where they are not licensed to practice law although a dispensation could be sought? Further, the particular B.C. Counsel the Board would use is complicit in the charges of fraud extant in T-2360-14. A further oral recommendation was made to the court by me to censure the Board's representative for falsifying information relating to the Ontario Superior Court's Williamson-Scott j. actions in which Hicks Morley et al dropped representation of the Employer and two judges were referred to the oversight bodies. For that matter, can the Respondent even get legal assistance in SK?

 

7) Contrary to oral evidence given in SK court by B.C.'s Geoff Litherland esq., this plaintiff is not barred from Ontario courts. Initially, they were prepared to accept what I later laid in Federal Court as T-2360-14. I am not finished in Ontario courts, not by a long shot.

 

8) Considering that this case has been assigned a docket number from the SK Appeal Court, I have decided to upgrade my unprejudiced offer of a settlement which expires in fifteen days from the date of this letter. The new sum will be now 6 million and 200,000 dollars. Further increases will be exponential.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow  'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System'

 

OCTOBER 27-2015

 

TO: Board of School Trustees (S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.)

1075-21st Street, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 4A9

tel: 604-981-1000   fax: 604-981-1001                                             SENT BY FAX

 

FROM: Roger Callow  208-2220 Halifax Drive, Ottawa, ON   K1G 2W7

tel:/fax: 613-521-1739

REFERENCE: APPEAL  CACV 2783 of  SK Queen's Bench 2015 SKQB 308

MESSAGE:

A) On Oct. 20-2015, I wrote to you including the following:

6) Is it wise to use B.C. Counsel in Saskatchewan where they are not licensed to practice law although a dispensation could be sought? Further, the particular B.C. Counsel the Board would use is complicit in the charges of fraud extant in T-2360-14. A further recommendation was made to the court by me to censure the Board's representative for falsifying information relating to the Ontario Superior Court's Williamson-Scott j. actions in which Hicks Morley et al dropped representation of the Employer. For that matter, can the Respondent even get legal assistance in SK?

8) Considering that this case has been assigned a docket number from the SK Appeal Court, I have decided to upgrade my unprejudiced offer of a settlement which expires in fifteen days from the date of this letter. The new sum is now 6 million and 200,000 dollars. Further increases will be exponential.

 

B) I am in the process of 'perfecting' the Appeal of the above case. Do you wish me to direct the account to a new lawyer assigned by you for this case?

C) The difficulty with B.C.'s Harris & Company  is that they are named in the fraud account of Federal Court's T-2360-14 now directed to the new Justice Minister for 're-evaluation' as well as the subject of a complaint to the SK oversight body by me for fraudulently presenting material they knew to be misleading in the lower SK court as I pointed out in oral argument.

D) For example, 95% of the Quebec court argument from the Employer's Que. representative was correctly based on the Ontario McKinnon j. account published on April 23-2015.

E) The SK material from Harris & Co. omitted that April 23-2014 document in their syllabus preferring to quote a bastardized 'second account' purporting to be from McKinnon j. dated September 15-2014.

F) Granted that any new Counsel for the Employer will have to explain that discrepancy considering that the lower SK court condoned that action outlined in E), nonetheless, I can see the SK Appeal Court rejecting Harris & Co. under these circumstances.

G) Should I not hear from you immediately on this letter, I will proceed with the 'perfection' as already designed with Harris & Co. as your representative. This letter will also be included in the perfection material.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow  'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System'