JUMP TO HOME PAGE

OPEN LETTER TO PMO (CANADA)– MAR.01-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employeescasecanada.com (30 year unresolved legal case) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 8 different court systems and over 30 judges. It's Canada’s Watergate - Pulitzer Prize winning author being sought. The 'find me a court' plea has fallen on deaf ears due to Registry, Ministry & Court obfuscation. I feel like Ralph Nader in 1961 trying to convince the public of dangerous cars (Unsafe at any speed). Who knows, maybe recalling judges and chief judges may become standard fare in the future - just like automobiles. To be sure, the current system is not working as now the Canadian Justice System has been shattered in its entirety by this case. The current case in Federal Court (T-2360-14) alleges fraud on behalf of the Respondent Employer and Union plus the court processes over the past 30 years. It would appear that the Respondents misrepresented themselves to this petitioner as to their authority.

 

1) From web: RECENT FEBRUARY 21-2015 A) Canadian oversight bodies do not work as witnessed in the past by CSIS and currently by the Employee's Case in which the oversight bodies of B.C., Federal Court, and Ontario have locked down and remain incommunicable. Hence      C-51 in that regard is nothing more than the judges calling out 4 previous Prime ministers to protect their own backsides as they don't wish to be blamed for the inevitable kerfuffle. B)Currently in Federal Court (T-2360-14), I have lodged a civilian charge of fraud against both the original conspirators and the court processes. Under the criminal code, Section 380(1)(a)- permits of an 'entity' as opposed to individual charges of fraud. Would such an entity charge against the B.C. Gov't. (BILL 35), the West Vancouver School Board and the Teachers Union plus Justice Southin shatter the fabric of the Canadian Justice System?...Nope. That has already been done with judicial cover-up which is happening on a daily basis in this case...and not a peep out of Parliament (Gang of 4: Harper/Mulcair/Trudeau/May) nor the anti-employee media.  Currently required is the revelation of the 'secret memo notes' of Justice Southin (1986) which the Employer and Union steadfastly refuse to divulge even under a sub-poena).  To be sure, P.M. Harper should immediately stop preaching to the rest of the world as to morality.

2) The continuous failure of  B.C. Teachers to place all School Districts 'into dispute' places Union membership for all Canadians into serious questioning. Why have a Union which sanctions the 'sweetheart deal'? (Many dismissals function on this level.) The imposed BILL 35 in 1985 (since withdrawn before this sole laid case was resolved = banana republic justice; has seen its counterpart in Ontario in 2013 under the imposed BILL 115 due to the B.C. Teachers failure to fight BILL 35 which was falsely - as it turned out - declared by the B.C. Teachers Union to be the 'battle of all teachers'.

DON'T VOTE

 

OPEN LETTER TO PMO (CANADA)– MAR.08-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

QUOTES: A)' It always bothered (policeman) Bosch when he saw justice and the law being manipulated by smart lawyers. His part in the process was pure. He started at a crime scene and followed the evidence to a killer. There were rules along the way but at least the route was clear most of the time. But once things moved into the courthouse, they took on a different shape. Lawyers argued over interpretations and theories and procedures. Nothing seemed to move in a straight line. Justice became a labyrinth. The Reversal  Michael Connelly

B) 'It is the business of the courts to make business for itself' 19th century novelist Charles Dickens

 

Our Courts

THE SLEAZEBALL AWARD

 

Litigation Management Award Nomination Form

Gestion de Litige Formulaire de Candidature

c/o National Post 365 Bloor St.E 3rd Floor Toronto, ON M4W 3L4

ELIGIBILITY:  All In-House Counsel regardless of year of call or position.

Litigation Management is not only about managing a court process but also managing the entire legal team-including outside counsel. It's not the size of a lawsuit that defines exceptional accomplishment in this category but rather, its complexity.

      In today’s commercial lawsuits counsel face a wide range of issues including the question of when to settle.

Judges will be looking for effective quarterbacking of overall legal strategy as well as evidence of hands on management of external advisers; how decisions made in legal strategy underpinned the company’s brand; and where appropriate, how the nominee managed multi-jurisdictional issues.

     The information should include a brief profile of the businesses involved; the issue; the jurisdictions; list of the external law firms used; and the outcome of the litigation.

 

PROPOSED CANDIDATES: A) Hicks, Morley et al of Ottawa and their representative, Charles Hofley esq.

B) B.C. Lawyer, Bruce Laughton, representing the BCTF/WVTA Teachers Union.

1) Have I ever got a candidate or two for you when it comes under the heading of 'judge shopping'. (You do include that topic, don't you? Because it can make or break your case as the following details will show.)

2) In Order to get interim compensation in Ottawa, Ontario for my unresolved 30 year illicit B.C.West Vancouver  teacher lay-off in 1985 due to being expelled from B.C. Courts under the 'Cullen Creed' in July 2013 (named after Associate Chief Justice, Austin Cullen), I laid #13-58607 in Ottawa Superior Court. The Cullen j. expelled me on his own recognizance from the B.C. courts without a hearing; without taking legal argument; and for reasons 'best known to himself'. There was no chance to appeal in B.C. because the all-important phrase 'may continue with permission of the judge' was conspicuous by its absence hence the appeal in Ontario was lodged under the terms of inherent jurisdiction of the court and natural justice.

3) Rather than providing a response to the above case, Hicks, Morley re-invented the legal powers of procedure by presenting #13-59060 to supplant my case. Remonstrations with the Ontario legal society by me were obviated as it was O.K. with them to see legal Counsel 'run a court within a court' (do you have prizes for that stunt?).

4) Now for the judge shopping whom turned out to be (federally appointed so under the authority of the Judicial Council of Canada(CJC)) none other than Ottawa Superior Court Justice, Colin McKinnon. (N.B. why is it so many judges -over 30 including such as Supreme Court of Canada's Beverley McLaughlin- have a 'Mac' in front of their name i.e. whatever do they put in the porridge of the 'Mac' clans?!!) He was duly rewarded for getting his judgment pasted onto Page 1 of the Ottawa Citizen on April 28-2014. No bonus points for the Citizen which refused a rebuttal although this Decision is under appeal and has been referenced to the CJC for other excesses of our new media hero.

5) 'This must be stopped. Now', McKinnon's bellicose Decision read. In court, he lambasted this writer for his presence...'You might just as well be in a court in Texas or New Mexico than to be here!, he bawled.' "But, but, your Honour, I am the Respondent here, not the Appellant." Such 'fine points of law' did not trouble our hero and he proceeded to rule me as being 'frivolous and vexatious' assigning, as he did, costs to Hicks, Morley et al. There were even more egregious events with this particular judge in conjunction with a second justice(again, a federal appointment sitting on Ontario's Superior Court), Robert Scott, which led to a complaint along with Hicks, Morley et al to the oversight bodies. There has been no response. Do you give awards to the oversight bodies for ignoring serious charges? The CJC made up of chief judges would certainly qualify.

6) Not being very popular around Ontario courts, I proceeded to lodge T-2360-14 in November 2014 in Federal Court charging the former Employer and Union with Fraud as well as the Judicial Processes associated with this case over 30 years in a matter of systematic judicial abuse.

7) Key to these charges were the 'secret memo notes' concealed by B.C. Justice Mary Southin (r.2004)whom, in 1986, quashed the arbitration favouring the Employer and ruled the gerrymandered government arbitrator, Louis Lindholm (d.1987) as 'patently unreasonable' . I was left in limbo without any compensation. Those memo notes detail meetings held by the Employer and Union and are in the possession of both parties. Of course revelation of this most vital information would start a minor war in the judiciary. What is it Justice Southin concealed and over 8 separate courts and over 30 judges have sought to keep sealed at the expense of the credibility of the entire Canadian Justice System? In short, how does the Employer and Union secrete these documents I sought to subpoena from them for the purpose of the Federal Court hearing? The new law of the land is a very old law...concealment!

8) By now, Hicks, Morley et al had departed the scene leaving Vancouver Employer legal Counsel to respond to T-2360-14. His response? Nothing other than to say 'me too' to the Union's sole argument of 'frivolous and vexatious' based on Ontario, j.McKinnon's record whose background for this charge was created by the court (and inaccurately so) for the purpose. Do you give any awards for inveigling the court into providing their resources on behalf of the litigants or is that a 'first' for Hicks, Morley et al? Surely there must be at least a prize for persuading the court to act as an agent for one litigant against the other. As for the Union, they never appeared in Ontario although I gave them the opportunity.

9) Now for 'judge shopping'. T-2360-14 was to be held before a judge in Ottawa. That's where my nemesis, Vancouver prothonotary, Roger Lafreniére, enters the picture thus upping the Appeal Procedure by a further block...prizes for that stunt? He had earlier 'jumped the gun' in T-1386-11 by giving a 'summary judgment' in a secret hearing which was rubber-stamped in a second secret hearing in Ottawa by a Justice Mosley. Attempts to file an Appeal were continually thwarted (a problem with all Appeal Courts...prizes there?) under Chief Justice Paul Crampton (the Office of the Chief Justice looms large in all these scams...more prizes?). Hence The CJC consists of Chief Justices adjudicating their own scams...nifty,eh?

10) It now became clear why the Employer's lawyer in Vancouver did not lodge the Federal Court Appeal which makes the most sense considering they were represented in all Ontario hearings. The obvious point here is that the Employer's lawyer did not have a personal connection to the court.

11) So, for a second time, Vancouver Prothonotary Lafreniére `jumped the gun` with a summary judgment wherein no mention of the accusation of fraud is included. A prothonotary should never have been appointed to this major topic on fraud in the first place. Indeed, I was quite specific in requesting a judge in Ottawa. Full points for that disingenuous diversion should be given to Union Lawyer, Bruce Laughton, whom looms large in the accusations of fraud dating from 1987 when I unsuccessfully tried to dismiss him.  `I represent the Union` he told me. The courts since 1995 (falsely so) decided that the Union represents me; a Union which has joined forces with the Employer against my interests. Now that deserves the biggest prize of all...do you have one that big?

12) To make a long story short, the judicial cover-up of this 30 year saga has cost the Canadian Judiciary its credibility. You must, if the Canadian General Council Association is to have any meaning, create the 'Canadian banana republic award' of the year for the litigant which has shown the Justice System to be the ass that it has become.

13) As to outcome of the issue?...after 30 years, there isn't any...oops, I just disqualified myself from the contest.

14) The National Post should have nothing to do with this specious contest.

 

OPEN LETTER TO PMO (CANADA)– MAR.14-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employeescasecanada.com (30 year unresolved legal case) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 8 different court systems and over 30 judges. It's Canada’s Watergate - Pulitzer Prize winning author being sought. The 'find me a court' plea has fallen on deaf ears due to Registry, Ministry & Court obfuscation. I feel like Ralph Nader in 1961 trying to convince the public of dangerous cars (Unsafe at any speed). Who knows, maybe recalling judges and chief judges may become standard fare in the future - just like automobiles. To be sure, the current system is not working as now the Canadian Justice System has been shattered in its entirety by this case. The current case in Federal Court (T-2360-14) alleges fraud on behalf of the Respondent Employer and Union plus the court processes over the past 30 years. It would appear that the Respondents misrepresented themselves to this petitioner as to the their authority.

 

'A GAME OF SILLY BUGGERS'

 

        

 

March 14-2015

 

TO: Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton with copy to PMO and P.M. Stephen Harper

       (see web for full account under  'A GAME OF SILLY BUGGERS')

 

QUOTES:

H)' A good faith effort to obey the law means a good faith effort to obey all law, not just the law one wishes to follow....' U.S. Judge Cameron Elliott as reported in the Epoch News

 

Federal Court Letter dated March 12-2015 signed by Emily Price, Registry Officer to the litigants in T-2360-14:  This is to advise of the following oral direction of the Honourable Madam Justice St.-Louis dated March 12, 2015:  "The documents are not appropriate for filing as they do not comply with Section/Rule 364(2)(c)(e)."

 

7) Rationale for the above letter:

a) The central message is to the Respondent Employer and Union not to give a response as the Registry is going to repeat a process of two years ago (T-1386-11) in which the same two individuals - Vancouver Prothonotary, Roger Lafreniére and Chief Justice Paul Crampton - pulled a similar stunt to drive this case out of court which forms part of the accusation of fraud against the Federal Appeal Court.

b) ...systematic judicial abuse. From that charge there is no recovery. One salient feature, however, is paramount: it is not a 'frivolous and vexatious' charge made by this Appellant. It is the lead civil action in all Canadian civil jurisprudence....amid Parliamentary and media silence....It doesn't get any bigger than that....

 

ACTION REQUESTED: For FAC Chief Justice Paul Crampton to so order this Appeal to be forwarded by the Registry to the hearing judge to assess all matters for arbitration in this case in writing as requested by all litigants. In the event that further obfuscation by this Registry is encountered by this Appellant, for 'heads to roll' by Prime Minister Harper on pain of stepping down himself.

 

cc Canadian Judicial Council 

    SCofC  M. Rothstein

    media

OPEN LETTER TO PMO (CANADA)– MAR.21-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

 

QUOTES:

A) 'This country is screwed and it is not going to get any better' Venezuelan kidnapper & murderer

B) 'I recall being fingerprinted on my first day at work as a (Phd) scientist in 1973. But things were different in those days. Then we trusted our government. How things have changed.

Times Change and so does trust/Letter to Editor/ O.C./ March17-2015 C4

 

Who is running this country? Such bureaucratic Chief Justices as Federal Court's  Paul Crampton or the Prime Minister and Parliament?

 

1) If the electorate were to choose between the credibility of bureaucratic entities and the economy as an election issue, 95% would, it is submitted here, choose the latter and yet without credibility, there can be no nation and no freedoms. SEE quotes above. In general, politicians are limited to the tangible as they focus on being elected. Question is, what good are they for after that...cliché speeches?

2) As matters now stand due to the exigencies of the Employee's Case, the Justice System of Canada lacks credibility, an intangible. A 30 year unresolved labour issue has exposed the underbelly of a corrupt judiciary guilty of systematic judicial abuse across B.C., Ontario and, currently, once again, the Federal Court. Over 8 separate courts and over 30 judges are a part of a charge of fraud (T-2360-14 Federal Court) as to court processes detailed on the above web site.

3) Every stunt in the legal repertoire - too numerous to detail here - has been invoked against this plaintiff including the overview bodies such as the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) going into complete lockdown over this matter.

4) Parliament (Gang of 4: Harper/Mulcair/Trudeau/May) would remain mute on this lead civil case in Canadian Jurisprudence as would the anti-employee Canadian media.

5) That the above judicial shenanigans have been practiced possibly right from the inception of the Justice System since 1867 (Canada's birthdate) is not the story. Rather, it is the exposure of that judicial malfeasance which, due to the unique features of the Employee's Case, has revealed this perfidy for a first time due to the unique features of this unresolved legal case.

6) Of greater concern is the cover-up by the judicial authorities, Parliament and the media which has reduced Canada to banana republic status. Maybe we all should visit Venezuela where 5 people are kidnapped per day in Caracas and murdered if the families do not pay the ransom because that is where we are headed if we do not get a Prime Minister 'with guts'. The last thing Canada and Canadians want to hear is that we are on this slippery slope due to the rapid decline of our institutions, the Justice System being paramount in that accusation.

7) Tory Defence Minister, Jason Kenney, for example, errs when he agrees with a Report castigating the action of 3 separate Defence judicial officers in a matter of a soldier's suicide without insisting on the removal of those miscreant officers (They can't fire us all if we say the same thing, can they?...same principal as with the Employee's Case). 'Just following orders' would then ring hollow with such decisive action as the above in a military known for its questionable delaying tactics.  Protecting whistleblowers such as this writer is a first step in that direction. Even China knows that to correct their abysmal corruption record in government, that they must 'chop heads'

8) Similarly, Prime Minister Harper should dismiss Federal Court Chief Judge, Paul Crampton, who has demonstrated for a second time (T-1386-11 & T-2360-14) with Vancouver Prothonotary, Roger Lafreniére, that 'jumping the gun' in order to undermine the course of justice in the above case which was originally designed to be heard by an Ottawa Judge, has subverted the course of justice to such an extent and degree that the charge of fraud is buried with nonsensical actions.

9) The central question raised here is why does the nation not know that which every legal personality is aware? The point here is that to expose this kind of judicial perfidy outlined above, there must be a 'standing case' which has never existed to date before the Employee's Case. Unfortunately, our country's leaders seem paralyzed in the imagination department as this situation deteriorates on a daily basis.

10) If Prime Minister Harper does not remove Federal Court Chief Justice by March 31, 2015, then the other three Parliamentary leaders should seek to impeach him; that declaration to be publicly made by April 07-2015.

11) Until that happens, no ethical Canadian should vote. Canada's Birthday (July 1) has been postponed by this writer on the grounds that our apathy as a nation should not be celebrated. I have renamed it, Anti-Judge Day. (dress up with your favourite slogan e.g. IN THE HALLS OF JUSTICE, ALL JUSTICE IS IN THE HALLS)

12) A copy of this letter is being sent to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) although not to Chief Justice B. McLachlin whom I earlier listed with filed form 25C (conflict of interest) since repealed. She sat, along with former Chief Justice T. Lamers (d.) in 1999 in rejecting the first appeal and was Chief Justice when this issue was rejected by the SCofC . Those rejections are at the heart of the judicial failure in the Employee's Case. Hence this issue is addressed to the Hon. A. Karakatsanis, in turn with other SCofC Justices at different times. She is asked to proceed with point 16)

13) Central to this issue regards Union representation of this member which the B.C. courts since 1995 (lay-off 1985) argued in the positive. The Employer disputed this connection in a letter claiming that the terms of the B.C.'s imposed legislation (BILL 35 of July 1-1985 - lay-off date was June 28, 1985 in this sole laid case before it was withdrawn in the 1990's) was the determinating factor.Hence the basic issue of status for this Appellant still goes unresolved and hence mars legal progress.

14) It is submitted here that extensive discussion of Bill 35 took place in West Vancouver in June of 1985 with government officials and with the local union, the West Vancouver Teachers Association. Justice Southin who had quashed the arbitration ruling the government-appointed arbitrator 'patently unreasonable'. She had requested all these meeting notes which she later returned 'because she did not use them'. Herein, it is maintained, lies the definition of the fraud against both the original conspirators and the ensuing court processes. Both the Employer and Union are steadfast in ignoring subpoenas from this Appellant. The courts response is to whitewash the whole affair by claiming that the single most important civil legal case in Canadian jurisprudence is 'frivolous and vexatious' and is therefore not worth considering. That's anarchy. What do I have to do? Keep refiling in every province in Canada in search of an 'honest judge'?

15) SCofC Registrar, Roger Bilodeau, had earlier repeatedly refused my appeals from the B.C. Courts from which I have been expelled for reasons best known to a judge in this unfinished case forcing me to turn elsewhere outside of B.C. He quotes Section 40 in that refusal which does not include the requirement of 3 Appeal Judges to seek an appeal at the SCofC although it is noted that the provinces have that condition in their own rules. He felt that my best route to the SCofC was in an appeal of T-1386-11 in Federal Court which was thwarted as noted earlier by Justice Crampton's courts.

16) I believe that the SCofC does have the residual power in a matter such as this, and I make the request here, to handle any case of  national importance which they deem worth hearing.  Justice McKinnon of Ontario Superior Court #59060-13 agreed with me (see transcript notes filed in the appeal of the Lafreniére's Decision) that the SCofC was the only court capable of handling the complexities of this case. In brief, the lower courts are but 'speed-bumps' in that process including the incompetent Lafreniére Decision currently being stymied in Appeal in the Federal Court by Chief Justice Paul Crampton.

17) One thing is clear at this point: Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton must be dismissed if Prime Minister Harper is to retain any stature as a Prime Minister.  

 

ACTION CALLED FOR: For the Supreme Court of Canada to invoke their residual powers as outlined in 16)

 

cc Gang of 4 (Harper/Mulcair/Trudeau/May)

     SCofC  Hon. A. Karakatsanis

     CBC's Peter Mansbridge (The National)

     Federal Court Chief Justice Hon. P. Crampton

 

BE ETHICAL - DON'T VOTE

 

OPEN LETTER TO PMO (CANADA)– MAR.28-2015

(FORMERLY OPEN LETTERS TO THE OTTAWA CITIZEN  and  U.S. NEWS)

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employeescasecanada.com (30 year unresolved legal case) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 8 different court systems and over 30 judges. It's Canada’s Watergate - Pulitzer Prize winning author being sought. The 'find me a court' plea has fallen on deaf ears due to Registry, Ministry & Court obfuscation. I feel like Ralph Nader in 1961 trying to convince the public of dangerous cars (Unsafe at any speed). Who knows, maybe recalling judges and chief judges may become standard fare in the future - just like automobiles. To be sure, the current system is not working as now the Canadian Justice System has been shattered in its entirety by this case. The current case in Federal Court (T-2360-14) alleges fraud on behalf of the Respondent Employer and Union plus the court processes over the past 30 years. It would appear that the Respondents misrepresented themselves to this petitioner as to the their authority.

 

                             LETTER TO OTTAWA/CARLETON TEACHERS

 

1) As a former 20 year Supply Teacher at most local public/separate school systems in Ottawa/Carleton, I feel some kinship with local teachers in their bid for a strike mandate. I also realize the Ontario government has a deep debt problem which is exacerbated by civil servant salaries.

2) In 1968, the B.C. government called for all employees to hold the line on inflation by accepting a recommended 6% salary increase. The teachers complied. Not so such blue collar unions as the electricians and the plumbers who fought and won 10% leaving some bright light in the government to proclaim:"8% average...we can live with that!"

3) In 1972, all West Vancouver teachers handed in their resignations to the Union as a labour tactic who in turn gave them to the School Trustees stating that unless all teachers were re-employed, there would be no deal. The Trustees backed down. In those days, there was no surplus unemployed teachers.

4) In Ontario in the 1990's, a teacher strike folded when the elementary teachers went back to work without notifying their secondary counterparts. While young teachers would not be aware of this story, to be sure the authorities are.

5) In 1985, the B.C. Government imposed BILL 35 which had its own regulations playing an end-game around the Union. This writer was the sole senior teacher lay-off which has never been resolved to this day. No compensation has been paid (including pension rights) although this matter has been before 8 separate courts (including 2 approaches to the Supreme Court of Canada) and over 30 judges (including Ontario) and remains unresolved.

6) The Employee's Case Canada is the lead civil case in Canada as the Justice System has collapsed leaving judge-made law the ultimate arbitrator with the Old Boy's Club calling the shot as to the judicial appointment.

7) The Ontario teachers had their own experience in 2013 with an imposed Bill 115 which was also later withdrawn (banana republic law) modeled on BILL 35 from B.C.

8) One scenario of a strike situation is for the School District to reverse the 1972 ploy by telling those striking teachers whom do not return to teaching by a certain date, will have to re-apply for their teaching position. At the end of the year, not all teachers will be re-employed.

9) What to do? Ontario teachers may wish to hedge their bets by reinforcing my request for all B.C. Teacher School Districts to place their respective Districts 'in dispute' until the Employee's Case is resolved and to publicize the above issue with the anti-employee media (SEE Ottawa Citizen April 28 p.1 article for which the Citizen refused the right of rebuttal)