<16.0pt>D) '...It wasn't the idea that the king and others
in authority should be subject to the law was new. That argument had been made
before and even occasionally honoured. What the new Charter did was to wrest
formally from the king the power to determine what the law was, to write it
down and to require that he obey it. Saying that those in power are subject to
the law isn't very helpful if they succeed in making the law up as they go
along. Brian Lee Crowley
E)'In this light, the most revolutionary chapter
- the one that later generations would turn to in promoting notions of universal
human rights - is Article 39. "No free man shall be taken or imprisoned,
or dispossessed or outlawed (RC) or exiled or in any way
ruined (RC), nor will we go or send against him except
by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the
law of the land." (RC)
N.B. Above quotations taken from a series of
articles on Magna Carta (Ottawa Citizen) June 13-2015
F) '...No one is above the law, no matter where
they are on earth. But many are above enforcement.' O.C. editorial
June 16-2915 C4
G) '...But what is striking about journalism in
Canada today is how often we do not ask the hard questions. This is either a
cause-or a consequence-of a hardened culture of secrecy. O.C. Andrew
Cohen columnist June 17-2015 C6
1) Magna Carta (M.G.) in 1215 occurred in a society
substantially different from the modern day. In effect, 25 nobles sought to be
the 'oversight body' to a tyrannical king doing so through 'a piece of paper'
heralding the modern day 'rule of law'.
significance of M.G. in the Employee's
Case is that this document did NOT extend beyond the Aristocracy
while in modern day law it does in the phrase 'no man (or woman) is above the
central question is raised by Lady MacBeth; 'What needst we
fear it when none can call us to account?'. In short, who will police the
oversight bodies for failing to do their job?
4) In law,
that requires a 'standing case' such
as is the Employee's Case for it is an unresolved
30 year labour case where no compensation has been paid as the courts
refuse habeas corpus on the part of
the Employer to produce the secret
missing memo notes of B.C. Supreme Court Justice, Mary Southin
(r. 2004) of events in June 1985 with the School District and the Union
regarding the illicit lay-off of senior teacher, Roger Callow, under the
auspices of the newly imposed BILL 35.
It was used only against the above personage and withdrawn before this case was
resolved (even though there was a court Order for the Employer to return to
litigation when the Arbitration was quashed leaving this targeted teacher - as
events turned out - in a 30 year state of limbo due to judicial chicanery).
'Due process' became 'duly processed' as Canada sank to Third World status.
collapse of the judicial oversight bodies is complete in Canada including
Parliament (Harper/Mulcair /Trudeau/May). The matter
is frozen with such as the Canadian Judicial Council which refuses to even
acknowledge my many formal complaints. I also include the anti-employee media
in this charge as they boycott this national issue leaving their credibility to
be outdone by the internet. The international press will first have to broach
6) The above
cartoon is symbolic of a nation where its leaders govern as a society of
privilege in which they ignore the population of 'stupid people' except, in
some desultory way, when they want votes. Hence my PLACARD: BE ETHICAL / DON'T VOTE
conclusion, similar to China, we have courts but no justice leaving the 21st
century for Canada in its downward democratic spiral from which there is no
ADDENDUM: No. 550-17-008208-157 H.Date June 8-2015
Decision; Therrien j. has three choices. He intimated
that he would have preferred that only the Employer would be heard on a 'motion
to dismiss' but relented due to my vociferous reaction to hearing my side as it
related to a frivolous and vexatious
ruling to dispose of the entire matter by the Employer.
A) He could order the 'secret memo notes' of Justice Southin in
1986 which outline the charge of fraud as laid by me in Federal Court (T-2360-14) which is still extant against the Employer and the Court
processes. When I requested those notes, I was ignored by the Employer's
Counsel so I made a specific request of Therrien j.
to put the question to the Respondent Employer. He refused.
B) He could accede to the Employer's wish to
sanction a frivolous and vexatious claim
made in Ontario courts under highly spurious conditions in which two judges and
the Employer's Ontario representative were referred to the oversight bodies.
(The Ontario firm dropped representation of the Employer as one consequence).
My argument here is, that without the secret
memo notes, how can he make a proper decision on this angle? Besides, he
would irrevocably tie the disreputable Ontario Court system to the tail of the
Quebec Courts...I would see to that.
C) Dispose of the case with this one-liner: 'As
Mr. Callow is not resident in Quebec, the courts have no obligation to
entertain his submission'. Nor was I a resident of B.C for the last 27 years
and yet not one court argued that point before I was expelled from B.C. courts
(Cullen j. Creed July-2013) for 'reasons best known to the judge'. That's why I
have sought justice in courts outside of B.C.
D) While not
an option, he could pull the stunt of Scott j. (14-59060 ON Superior Court) by not writing any Decision thus
impairing any appeal that I might make. He should expect repercussions from me
on that level.
all the oversight bodies (including Parliament-Harper/Mulcair
/Trudeau /May- and the anti-employee media would like to postpone action on the
Employee's Case until after the October
election. Not possible as the Employee's
Case IS THE ELECTION ISSUE
surpassing all other issues. The oversight bodies have been provided sufficient
rope by me with which they have managed to strangle themselves irreparably.
F) And what,
I asked Justice Therrien, if I acquired the 'missing memo notes' from other sources
and they fulfil my accusations of fraud, what would that say about the Quebec
Justice System? Many Quebecers mistrust the English Canadian courts. How will
they feel if it is seen that French Canada also suffers 'the English disease'?
summary, the Employee's Case has seen the demise of the individual in Canadian
society. That is an indictment without equal.
The Outlawed Canadian
in an outlaw Justice System
cc Premier Couillard
Governor General of Canada