COMMERCIAL LIEN

The Commercial Lien Strategy - Background

†††† Faced with corrupt lawyers and judges, no litigant can expect to win in court by simply playing defense. To beat them, you must be able to scare them. You must be able to make them respect you, and that means you must be able to take the offense ó attack them personally.

†††† Unfortunately, judges, lawyers, and other government officials enjoy various levels of personal immunity provided by both law and "professional courtesy." How do you sue a lawyer for malpractice? You hire another lawyer ó if you can find one whoíll take the case. How do you sue an IRS agent for violating your Constitutional rights? Only with great difficulty. How do you sue a judge for railroading you in court? You donít.

†††† As a practical matter, private citizens canít sue the President of the United States, a Governor, judge, or even an IRS agent for failing to obey or enforce the laws. If we try to sue in court to compel our government officials to obey the law and perform their lawful duties, the judges routinely ignore our petitions and laugh us out of court.

†††† Because legal and de facto immunities shield government personnel from being sued for committing crimes against the People, the public is legally disarmed, unable to aggressively sue the government or its agents and compel them to obey the Law. As a result, the publicís legal posture is fundamentally defensive: we try to duck, dodge, and hide in legal loopholes to defend ourselves against the government and the courts. We try to escape, evade, and avoid, but we seldom counter-attack against our antagonists, largely because we think there are no lawful weapons to do so. However, it appears that a powerful offensive legal weapon may now have been discovered, tested, and proven for common Citizens ó the commercial lien.

†††† We donít try to sue a government official for failing to perform his lawful duties. Instead, we simply file a lien that encumbers the officialís personal property and credit rating like a ton of bricks until he voluntarily satisfies our demand to perform his lawful duty, and we, in turn, voluntarily agree to excise the lien.

 

†††† Similar to a rarely used secretive mandamus court with its origins in Britain aping the 'Court of Star Chambers' - little more than a court for torture - functions in Canada similar to the above commercial lien notes coming from the U.S. For example, in the U.S. 'we, the people' which makes Congress a servant of the people is vested as a keynote for natural justice in the U.S. Canada's counterpart is the Governor General currently filled by Julie Payette whom has disgraced herself in the broader issue of 'we, the people' in the issue defined herein. (SEE website 2019) Doug Ford, Ontario's Premier is experiencing first hand her ineptitude as for 1-1/2 years, he has failed to assign a court date for CV 18000 769 which names two judges for malfeasance. They were never examined by the oversight body concerned. Complicating the matter is that the Employer cannot get Ontario legal counsel since the earlier debacle in 2014. In some weird fashion, the conspirators believe that they can 'suck and blow' at the same time with this mandamus court in order to bar this writer from any Ontario court. Considering the matter is one of fraud, the sitting mandamus court judge opens himself to personal charges in this regard if this court is to be nothing more than a kangaroo court. In such an eventuality, I have informed 40 large Ottawa legal entities that I would be crowd sourcing them to pay any dunning fees assigned to me. Ontario forms on this issue are understandably hard to find.

 

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT LIENS (U.S.)

The Commercial Affidavit Process is a pre-common law process. It is also referred to as a "commercial law process," not to be confused with the [Uniform] Commercial Code and other manipulated and complicated rules and regulations. It is a pre-common law process because until there is a disagreement, there is no dispute. All that is being done is the establishment of claims and obligations. The purpose of the CAP is to

make claims and determine if the accused agrees or not. If the Accused does not contest the claims there is no dispute to be adjudicated thus the appropriate damages are consensually agreed-upon. Thus it is pre-judicial. It may also be completely non-judicial if it is properly (composed of unrebuttable truth) and successfully implemented.

 

The term "commercial" as used herein refers to any dealings people have among themselves. Thus the "laws of commerce" refers to the just rules of procedure governing human relationships, the self-evident principles of right and wrong which are the foundation of the common law.

 

Justice is delivered quickly, simply, fairly and conclusively with the Commercial Affidavit Process. This may be a terrible disappointment to wrong-doers who are confident they can get away with their illegitimate activities. Those who are subverting just laws, setting them aside, covering them up, creating shadow-law or colorable law and just generally using self-serving laws to subject and plunder their fellow man are in for a rude awakening. In summary, the Common Law grows out of the laws of commerce which themselves are based upon self-evident truths. Such truths are commonly expressed as maxims.

 

It needs to be thoroughly understood that because it is driven by SWORN TRUTH, the Commercial Affidavit Process is outside the jurisdiction of any equity court. It is a private contract matter. Should an attempt be made to involve an equity court it would result in a trespass against the Applicant's rights: those interfering individuals, who were unlawfully involved, would themselves become one of the accused. An equity court has no jurisdiction whatsoever, for the CAP is strictly a non-judicial or pre-judicial process between individuals and is private.

 

NO judge, court, law, or government can invalidate these commercial processes, i.e., an affidavit or complaint or a lien based thereon because no third party can invalidate someoneís affidavit of truth.

 

Meeting The Demands

If (as is usually the case) the Accused recognizes the charges are true and/or decides (correctly) that the wisest thing to do is meet the demands rather than face the staggering punitive damages which accompany the issuance of the Criminal Complaint, the Accused has the option of simply meeting the demands for redress as required by or negotiated with the Claimant. If the Accused has the good sense to meet the demands of the Claimant, then the wrongs have been satisfactorily redressed; and that is the end of the issue: all charges are resolved; the Commercial Affidavit Process is closed. A civil action for $10 million against Dr. A. Jahagirdar of Towngate Family Medicine for civil fraud has been filed: CV20 82659. An action in Ottawa Small Debts Court (and the subject of this mandamus court where she refuses to appear on Feb. 27) 19-SC-155235 is focused entirely on disclosure of my complete medical file which caused the suspension of my driver's license in perpetuity for 'reasons best known to the Transport Ministry-Medical'. Many people in 'car cultures' depend on driving hence U.S. involvement is essential. They refuse to communicate with me prompting a request to Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders to seize my file. Similar to Ottawa Police Chief Sloly, both are procrastinating.

 

Failure to follow the correct process of rebutting the charges or ANY ATTEMPT TO PRESENT REBUTTAL EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT SWORN AS BOTH TRUE and "THE WHOLE TRUTH" INVALIDATES such response as if no evidence or rebuttal were given at all. SUCH FAILURE IS FATAL TO THE DEFENSE!

 

If a proper rebuttal is offered, any of several conclusions may result:

1. If any or all charges are rebutted, those charges will (at Claimantís discretion) be resolved as described under "RESOLUTION BY JURY."

2. Any charges not rebutted or redressed will result in a DEFAULT CONVICTION for those charges and the issuance of a "non-trial" criminal complaint which will be covered under "CRIMINAL LIABILITY."

 

Summary

The fundamental purpose, and one of the major objectives of the Commercial Affidavit Process is to educate wrongdoers to the fact they have abused the unalienable rights of a sovereign Citizen and cannot get away with it, and to give them an opportunity (commercial grace) to repent and undo the wrongs they have done. Unlike the typical criminal trial where the Accused no longer has the option of simply redressing the wrongs he or she has done, the Commercial Affidavit Process DOES give the Accused that option!

Further, the CAP is designed to educate wrongdoers that they are being used by the conspirators in the war against the People. Thus they may see for themselves what is really going on and decide which side they choose to serve.

 

A commercial lien may not be removed by anyone except the lien claimant, or a properly-convened, properly-conducted jury trial (due process). It may not be removed by a summary process. A summary process is too vulnerable to bribery, kickbacks, and fraud of process.

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND

(approximately 30 days response time)

 

PROCESS: 1) AFFIDAVIT2) CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS3) ONTARIO COURT FORM 'APPROXIMATING' NOTICE AND DEMAND

 

1) and 2)

Form 4D

Courts of Justice Act

Between

ROGER CALLOW

v.

DR. A. JAHAGIRDAR

 

affidavit

 

affidavit of ROGER CALLOW

††††† I, ROGER CALLOW, of the (City, Town, etc.) of OTTAWA, in the (County, Regional Municipality, etc.) of ONTARIO†† , (SELF-REPRESENTED) AFFIRM:

1) THAT THE DEFENDENT MEDICAL DOCTOR BY WITHHOLDING MY COMPLETE MEDICAL REPORT HAS MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO ACQUIRE A NEW DOCTOR.

2) THE INFORMATION SHE WOULD WITHHOLD IS THE TOPIC OF AN ACTION FILED FOR ALLEGED FRAUD: CV20 82659 (OTTAWA SUPERIOR COURT REGISTRY)

(SIGNED) ROGER CALLOWFEBRUARY 2, 2020

 

______________________________________

 

 

3)

Form 17A

Courts of Justice Act

request for service abroad of judicial or extrajudicial documents My underlining RWC

CONSIDERING A COMMERCIAL LIEN IS OUTSIDE A COURT'S JURISDICTION, THIS FORM IS TRUNCATED FOR THE PURPOSE

 

 



Identity and address of the applicant


ROGER CALLOW#2001-1285 CAHILL DR. OTTAWAKIV 9A7.......................................

 



Address of receiving Authority


DR. A. JAHAGIRDAR c/o TOWNGATE FAMILY MEDICINE 2446 BANK ST. STE. 201 OTTAWA K1V 1A.............................................................................



(identity and address)
ALL INFORMATION CAN BE DELIVERED TO THE ABOVE APPLICANT, WHOM DISMISSED THE FORMER MEDICAL DOCTOR HEREIN DESCRIBED ON NOVEMBER 01-2019 FOR BREACHING DOCTOR-PATIENT

CONFIDENTIALITY.



THIS APPLICATION WAS MAILED IN DUPLICATE ON FEBRUARY 2, 2020 AS SWORN BY ROGER CALLOW ________________________

 

 

†††††††