OCTOBER-2019
October 5-2019
TO: letters@ottawacitizen.com FROM: Roger Callow aka 'Outlaw'
employeescasecanada.ca
Dear Editor
'It is the business of the courts to make business for itself' with the unaccountable Justice Canada being Canada's strongest Union according to one-time Citizen columnist now in retirement, Dave Brown.
Without any mention of the unresolved 34 year B.C. labour issue involving this writer which includes imposed legislation (B.C.'s BILL 35 1985) akin to the Carbon Tax issue and in which no compensation has been paid; this leading legal debacle has been badly compromised by a media boycott of this national issue.
In short, James Bagnall's UNEASY lies the CROWN / James Bagnall dives deep into why the Crown loses big cases. City, A2-4 and continues in Observer, D1-D4 is academic codswallop. He has limited experience of how business operates. Here's one example. It was always known in B.C. in the 1960's that two large bridge building entities (my father worked at different times for both) took their turn sharing bridge contracts when along came an upstart Company seeking to break into the business. Newspapers of the time had grandiose pictures of this newby floating bridge sections into place for the new Second Narrows Rail Bridge. Of course newby which had - surprise, surprise - the lowest bid, had to go out and borrow money to buy machines, hire workers, and all the other attendant costs. In short, their success lay in getting the next two or three bridge contracts which - wait for it - they didn't get leaving them in bankruptcy. And who was it at the auction buying up the new specialized equipment for 'a song'? Two guesses.
The real story for Bagnall lies in how the Courts are able to sidetrack disclosure or habeas corpus, if you will, the bedrock of our democracy. Over 50 judges have denied me that basic right and not a peep out of any politician.
Roger Callow The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice
System due to judicial and government malfeasance.
OCTOBER 06-2019
1) The Liberals are well organized (with the help of tax dollars); the
others are not. The Oct. 7 debate to be held in Gatineau is a case in point
where there is limited parking for onstreet
demonstrators plus the debating leaders will be driven down into an underground
parking lot away from detracting protesters. The last two Federal debates which
I attended with my 'don't vote' Placards smack in the middle of the Party
apparatchiks, was held opposite the Chateau Laurier where the leaders arrived
in busses.
2) A Dolighan cartoon in the O.S.
portrays the spirit of this election in which Trudeau is shown 'arse over teakettle' having skidded on black face paint
with a gormless Scheer
standing alongside the football with the crowd on the sidelines yelling 'Pick
up the ball !' Insurance adjusters from
'Slow Moe' SK do not good leaders make.
3) The contradictory message of the Tories is their undoing. To make the
world worth living in for your grandchildren tomorrow, we will have to make
sacrifices today - namely, your job. Tell that, which the Tories and their
media supporters in the Tory O.S.
do, to half of Canadians whom live from pay check to pay check. It's like
offering a drink of water to a drowning man. Forget the polls, these are
realities which voters live with and are keeping their voting decisions close
to their chest.
4) Jason Kenny from AB where his future is dimming (explain that class
action against miscreant judges, Jason) is rushing to Ontario, not to assist Scheer as he professes, but to replace him. He smells
blood. One columnist calls on the Ford gov't. to
speak in favour of the Federal Tories which shows
just how desperate the Tories have become.
5) As the incumbent gov't. doling out
infrastructure contracts (roads, etc.) the Liberals are in a position to punish
those areas which do not support the Liberal candidate by canceling the local
project.
6) Don't forget the Sikh vote which bought Brown in ON although he was
ousted by the white guys in a case still before the courts. They also paid down
much of the mammoth NDP debt run up by that Party to gain control which is in
danger of extinction for financial reasons. Many NDP MP's dropped out of the
race no doubt correctly believing that they would have to set aside much of
their salary to offset Party debt. While
Harper and Trudeau kept their communications open as P.M.; that cannot be said
for Mulcair or Singh whom wish limited contact with
'the great unwashed' (sidenote; which politician had
the most arrogant body language I encountered with my Placards? Ans. Jack
Layton. That should surprise many.)
7) The throwaway vote - Greens, NDP - are hoping for a minority Liberal gov't. to leverage. At any rate, the NDP openly rejected
the Tories killing their chances of a minority gov't.
8) Is this the 'Last Hurrah' for the Ottawa Sun? Count on it. They
are there to win, not lose elections, and are following on the heels of their
counterparts in the U.S. when Trump won. Labour
unrest with the U.S. GM strike has impacted Ontario with job losses. People in
the 905 belt where the election will be won or lost are frightened. Frightened
people are not inclined to vote for a new gov't. As
for the Sun which is bleeding red ink due to a loss of advertising to the
internet: in the 1950's I delivered newspapers in West Point Grey where every
house took a newspaper
(Vancouver Sun
for the Liberals and Vancouver Province for the Tories); my sons in the 1990's
delivered newspapers in Ottawa to every second house; today an early morning
delivery car for both papers will drive a city block for a single delivery. Our
21 story tower has 18 subscriptions with only a few for the Ottawa Sun. I
cancelled the Sun recently as I was not prepared to pay $400 per year for
non-stop Tory propaganda. National Geographics, the
Epoch Times (anti-CCP) and internet World News fill the void. (I stopped CTV
and CBC TV news which appear to depend on two individual vans respectively
roaming the city looking for a story plus the ad nauseam amount of
advertising.) I never hear anyone discussing what the political pundits are
saying about the election.
9) In parting, I have a piece of advice for all readers; get your money
out of the mutual funds and into a bank now, not later, as an investor cannot
count on getting his or her money out when the next Depression hits which is
always fast. The underlying economic problem is that our system of government -
no matter which economic model - is unsustainable. Salary increases are
diminished by cost of living increases about 2-1. Old age pensioners on fixed
incomes, for example, must choose between food and medication. Meanwhile, the
1% of the population is getting richer with their management contracts with
your money (including now pension money) where the individual takes all the
risk e.g. Bombardier.
October 07-2019
TO: Brian Pallister Premier MB
450 Broadway Ave.
Winnipeg MB R3C 0V8
t.(204)945-3714 f.(204)949-1484
e-mail: Premier@leg.gov.mb.ca sent
by fax
FROM: Roger
Callow self-represented plaintiff
1285 Cahill Dr. #2001 Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7
e-mail: rcallow770@gmail.com
web: employeescasecanada.ca MAY 2019 Sub-heading: PREMIER PALLISTER
MESSAGE:
1) Acknowledgement of letter from J. Wiggett Deputy Register Court of Queen's Bench Winnipeg, Manitoba dated October 2, 2019 is made and enclosed here to Premier Pallister. Inclusion of Res Ipso Loquitor from B.C. constitutes my oral presentation in a revised MB Application based solely on disclosure.
2) Why it should take from June 20,2019 and July 30,2019 and an intervening election in which Pallister was re-elected is of note.
3) Much legal water in other venues has taken place since my last communication with the court in a legal matter directly impinging on your upcoming imposed carbon tax which, while being more refined than the others, is one you can expect to lose even though your arguments are more refined than SK and ON as you chose not to join my constitutional challenge (Imposed BILL 35 - B.C. 1985) Of course the Carbon Tax is more about fees and control over legislation than any regard to actual climate considerations.
4) For this reason I will be re-instituting my legal case as an Application limited to demanding disclosure only as all else flows from that initial step. Following is taken from B.C. activity:
With a positive
response to my request for disclosure,
which would undoubtedly show fraud (as I know what happened but knowing and
producing evidence in a court of law are distinct entities); in law everything
flowing from that fraud is 'null and void' permitting criminal charges
to be assigned. I have no interest in pursuing the alleged malfeasance of the
judges as that is for the court and oversight bodies to decide. Unfortunately
B.C. Attorney General David Eby is MIA on this file
but has a new opportunity to re-file a charge.
If Hinckson cj had given me a chance
to respond to his aberrant Order, the following would apply (and still applies
to his Sep. 2019 Order):
Res Ipso Loquitor Latin for "the thing speaks for
itself."
Overview In tort law, a principle that allows plaintiffs burden of proof with
what is, in effect, circumstantial evidence. The plaintiff can create a
rebuttable presumption of negligence by the defendant by proving that the harm
would not ordinarily have occurred without negligence, that the object that
caused the harm was under the defendant's control, and that there are no other
plausible explanations. In the vernacular, this term is likened to the patient
whom goes for a hospital arm operation and comes away without his foot instead.
Prima Facie Case To prove res ipsa loquitor negligence, the plaintiff must prove 3 things:
1. The incident was
of a type that does not generally happen without negligence The court noted negligence when they quashed
the arbitration in 1986 for failing to show a causal factor.
2. It was caused by
an instrumentality solely in defendant's control. As the senior teacher laid off under the imposed conditions of BILL 35 (lay-off for economic reasons
only); I had no say in that process
3. The plaintiff did
not contribute to the cause. If I did,
then disclosure is called for which over 50 judges including Hinckson cj. should have called
for or ordered the RCMP to act. He ignored all issues limiting his response to
a 'bastardized' interpretation of the 'MacKenzie
Creed'. The Cullen Creed of July 2013 which superseded the earlier creeds
received no reference in Hinckson cj's
Order.
4) A.G. Eby's inaction is the sole source of
this judicial malfeasance. Premier Horgan should
replace him and order this matter back to the court with a special
investigator. cc Premier Horgan / media (Sept. 26-2019 N.B. Eby can now do this with Hinckson's
new Order.)
Yours truly, Roger Callow (plaintiff)
cc to the new Justice Minister after the October 21 Federal election
PM Trudeau
encl. Wiggett Deputy Register letter
OCT.15-2019 re 1999 'Letter to the editor' from
R. Callow
Background: Marianne, shown in this 1994 illustration
(not included here), has been a female symbol of liberty in France
Two fried eggs The Citizen's portrayal of
five women on the front page (Sept. 26, 1999) with four merely showing a face
and the fifth, the clear winner, being shown complete with cleavage, has this
reader wondering whether the other four have to depend on their brains as their
other germane qualification amounts to "two fried eggs on a board?" I also wonder if this is the Canadian
payback for DeGaulle's 'Quebec Libre'
speech in the spirit that if 90,000 French mayors must be right in a
booby-hatch contest? No doubt the best
points will be made by a rabid coterie of feminists who will point out in no
uncertain terms that should the French catalogue wish someone who
"represents a new generation of women; eclectic generous and open",
they need look no further than the next street corner of a red-light district
in the age-old story that sex sells; brains don't. Liberty, Equality and
Brotherhood are not obviously a pitch for Sisterhood. Roger
Callow Ottawa
A second female writer wrote... Of
the five candidates portrayed, four were shown in a heads-only fashion. The
fifth candidate...photograph was cropped just below her largely exposed
breasts....
OCT. 15-2019 Letter from a close friend of my own age (still alive) in Feb. 3, 2004:
Hi Roger
I read your letter, and to be honest, I wasn't surprised to hear what
you said. We have the worst government system in the world, a bunch of bandittos. It means that the 'little people' will always
remain little and those big healthy smucks will keep
on getting richer!!! Isn't it something: "You are barred from entering a
courthouse". what a pile of crap!!
Roger, keep fighting if you have the force and will power to do it, and
I will always be with you to help in any little way that I can....
....and from one
'with' the University.... 'It would seem
that your employer would go to extremes to make a point.'
...and from April
02-1998 comes this letter to the editor N.B. former SCofC
Judge Frank Iacobucci currently sitting on the board
of SNC Lavellin
'Greedy
lawyers' aren't the problem If SCofC Justice Frank Iacobucci is
so concerned about "hired guns" undermining our justice system, he
has no further to look for the source of that problem than into the next mirror
("Judge scolds greedy lawyers", March 30) To bastardize Shakespeare,:
"Our problems lie not in our greedy lawyers, my dear Iacobucci,
but in ourselves as judges for not curtailing legal billable time exercises or
encouraging badly needed reforms in our laws of evidence". This problem
has been endemic in our Canadian justice system for decades although it has
been exacerbated as of late and it is not entirely the fault of "greedy
lawyers". A number of years ago, I
sat in on civil action preliminaries for a morning in British Columbia. The
majority of lawyers were sent back by the presiding judges to cross the t's and dot the i's before the
court would entertain their submissions. Some lawyers wrinkled up their noses
in disgust. I was stung for an additional $200 in one such scenario for a
simple matter of probate conducted by a legal firm specializing in
probates. Not being a lawyer or a "hired
gun" myself, I am not ignorant of legal procedures and question the sub
rosa message being peddled by Judge Iacobucci -
namely, that legal guns are being invited to save their clients' money by not
pursuing some matters; matters which would prove embarrassing to the bench. It
appears Judge Iacobucci's message is designed to
curry favour with the public at the expense of the
legal profession. If the truth be
known, the future of our country is in far more jeopardy than the public would
like to believe from a crumbling justice system than it is from the separation
of any one province. As such, Judge Iacobucci's
statements do little to advance the cause of judicial reform in present-day
Canada. Roger Callow Ottawa