JUMP TO HOME PAGE

 

 

MARCH 01-2019

 

 

 

'IT IS FINISHED'

100 year-old John of the Gospels on the 'Second Coming'

OR, in the words of President Donald Trump

'Those sly Canadians'

OR, in the words of this blogger, employeescasecanada.ca,

WWII veterans must be rolling over in their graves

to witness a democratic country which failed 'to stand on guard for thee'

 

QUOTES: A) 'A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by dictatorship'  18th century Scottish jurist Lord Alexander Fraser Tytler  B)As the Chinese saying goes, 'From thrift to extravagance is easy, but the opposite is difficult.' After people develop a dependence on welfare, it becomes impossible for government to reduce the scale and type of benefits. The Western welfare state has become a political quagmire for which politicians and officials have no solution. Epoch Times

C) 2018 marked the end of the 34 year unresolved Employee's Case wherein no compensation was paid to senior West Vancouver teacher, Roger Callow, the sole teacher laid off in 1985 under B.C.'s neophyte imposed BILL 35 which has been before over 50 judges and continues under a national media boycott. Ottawa Sun columnist, Mark Bonokoski, is a symbol of that failure on a national level. FEBRUARY 2019 marked the end of the international level as symbolized by two other O.S. columnists; Tarek Fatah and Farzana Hassan.

D) Canadian cowardice in the above international regard is symbolized by Donald Trump's complicity  in his abject failure to call out the Ontario Courts of Premier Ford where U.S. interests have significant dealings. 'Be careful in the ideas you choose; for if you don't, they will choose you and not very credible ones at that' reflects his personal failure in this matter. Now any interest may break the media boycott on this major democratic debacle in which, similar to the downfall of Rome, the dictators await in the wings. Trump's failure to invoke the Magnitsky Act  (legal and moral turpitude)against Canada (this Act may not be invoked internally; only by another signatory) speaks legions about his own culpability as U.S. interests deal with Ontario courts on a daily basis.

E) 'Where there is no publicity, there is no justice.' Jeremy Bentham

F) '...I read once that  nothing takes the place of persistence. Damn right. Not talent. I know a lot of lousy lawyers with talent. Not brilliance. Hell, unrewarded genius was almost the norm. Not education, since the world was full of smart derelicts. Nope. Persistence wins. And like Einstein said, "You have to learn the rules of the game, then you have to play better than everyone else....' The Bishop's Pawn Steve Berry

G) ADDENDUM: Nobody has the corner on the market for reading. I count myself a 'reader' in that I am always reading of only materials which are well-written on any topic. I count less than 10% of the public in that mold. Of persistence, I have that 'in spades' as evidenced by the 34 year unresolved employeescasecanada.ca . In any challenge, it is not so much being good as it is in being better than the opposition. The problem for conspirators is that they have to depend on people 'of the lowest common denominator' such as the over 50 judges which have screwed this pooch over and over with this distinction...I catch them at it. The central chore of all leaders is to ferret out 'whistleblowers' and neutralize them. The authorities were able to get away with stunts in the Employees Case with the co-operation of the media . Not so easy today with the internet and its e-mails charting 'what did he know and, more importantly, when did he know it' which is the bedrock of all trials.

H) I cannot emphasize this point sufficiently; the Employee's Case did not create the aberrant conditions found in Justice Canada. Rather, it has exposed these extant shortcomings through a unique juxtaposition of legal events from one province to another as symbolized by this PLACARD: GHOST OF EDGAR J. HOOVER RUNS CANADA. One might parallel the situation here to the long term pedophilia extant in the Catholic Church covered up by the Pope which is no longer acceptable. Retribution, not prayer, is  now the case for both topics.

 

MESSAGE:

1) To be sure when the above story breaks in the media; those forces will seek to diminish their personal failure by supplanting 'teacher reveals bitter truth' with 'truth revealed by a bitter teacher' as a means of mollifying their readers with, of course, no mention of the anti-employee media boycott.

2) Will the Employee's Case continue in law courts? In some desultory fashion or other, yes, but the point is, the case now operates in a vacuum: PLACARDS: A) NO RULE OF LAW / (1) CANADA (2) CHINA    B) VOTERS / FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER FOOLS

3) Would public revelation of this case lead to the demise of the Liberal Party in the October  Federal election? Coming on top of the former Minister of Justice caper with A.G. Jody Raybould-Wilson; most assuredly. The Tories have to decide. Either publicize the Employee's Case now or in the event of election success, face the entire gamut of lies from the Employee's Case on the selfsame day that they take their oath of Office. Lose the election without this revelation and they lose...everything....

4) The failure of 'Tory' Saskatchewan Premier 'Hayseed' Moe, to call for Special Counsel in the Saskatoon version of this case where SK is fighting for its life against the imposed Carbon Tax within the context of the Employee's Case looming large with its imposed BILL 35 as a game changer was thrown away by him. In this scenario, the federal Liberals need a knock-out punch in SK to maximize their election message in October. For other political reasons, the Tories wish a Liberal win. In this regard, two decades ago, columnist Dave Brown claimed that the legal fraternity is the country's 'strongest union'. In brief, a fifth column has mounted a weak case in SK as the judiciary 'hang together'. Exposing this perfidy would require a Premier to appoint Special Counsel to the Employee's Case. Is Alberta Premier Notley up to the challenge?

 

In the battle between good and evil, evil invariably wins out

Surely that is the worldly lesson of the crucifixion

 

The Walking Drum Louis L'Amour

"Lie to a liar, for lies are his coin; steal from a thief, for that is easy; lay a trap for the trickster and catch him at the first attempt, but beware of an honest man.

 

We all lie. Know how a person or entity lies and you know very much his or her measurement or Entity RC

 

 

MARCH 02-2019

RULE OF LAW (?) IN ALBERTA by Roger Callow (March 02-2019);

 former West Vancouver senior teacher laid-off in 1985 in an unresolved 34 year case under B.C,'s imposed BILL 35 (1985). No compensation has been paid

Reference: employeescasecanada.ca  2019 - RECENT 5

MESSAGE:

1) Through the malfeasance of over 50 judges across Canada (including 4 inconsequential trips to the Supreme Court of Canada); this plaintiff has been denied due process of the law. As no oversight body will recognize any complaint; judicial names are included in the fraud accusations in actions in Ontario (2 judges) and Alberta (1 judge) (SEE web: 2018 B.C. Chief Justice Hinckson - Fraud)

2) Running a 'court within a court' has not only plagued the courts of law but the Registries as well as this Plaintiff seeks to get a court date. In AB, that consisted of requesting that Premier Notley and the Court of Queen's Bench-Edmonton appoint Special Counsel to handle this three-pronged case a) disclosure denied this Plaintiff for 34 years in which I know from the 11-day arbitration (Union argument-1/2 hour) later quashed by the court was a fraud based on a 'sweetheart deal'.

3) But knowing and proving your case in a court of law are two different things and when the courts conspire against a litigant, it is more than an uphill battle. The Employer, for example, does not recognize court oversight of imposed legislation (imposed carbon tax interests...are you listening?) The Union refuses this client his right to disclosure. (For those interested in a 1986 public perspective; see 2019-MARCH :WEST VANCOUVER TEACHERS ASSOCIATION - FRAUD (last three pages of 16 page action laid March 01-2019)

4) UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

a) The defeat of the Nova Scotia constitutional challenge was immediately followed by the eradication of School Boards as no Premier wishes $20 million lawsuits against whacko Boards.

b) No ethical administrator will write a negative Teacher's Professional Report - and lord knows some should be written on some teachers - due to the politics of this case

c) No Union client will be represented by Union counsel unless accompanied by his own personal lawyer ($10,000?) to protect him against the 'sweetheart deal' (most cases).

5) The case in AB currently stymied by Notley-Edmonton Courts is 3-fold: a) disclosure with which a civil case of fraud could almost certainly turn into a criminal case of fraud. If proven, all action under the original charge becomes null and void. b) imposed legislation  c) fraudulent activity of Chief Justice Hinckson. The court may decide on how to handle the latter two while I insist on a) disclosure.

6) Regrettably, no professional teacher or group of teachers has seen fit to set up an independent web site which makes our Parliaments and Justice System obsolete: PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS AGAINST IMPOSED LEGISLATION

 

POST IN STAFFROOM

 

MARCH  06-2019

Re: Ford's unexploded bomb Issue just waiting to go off (re OPP police chief appt. debacle)

Lorrie Goldstein O.S. March 06-2019 p. 11 my comment: both issues fail his 'smell test'

 

MESSAGE:

1) A bigger 'unexploded bomb' is the refusal of the Ottawa Registry clerk to even speak to me about filing for a court date in a filed action which Ford personally wrote me that he would not intervene. That letter followed on the abysmal performance of his A.G. Caroline Mulroney on the file. So for 8 months, this filed case sits in limbo with no-one (including Wilson-Raybould) willing to act. I even put the question to President Trump in invoking the Magnetsky Act against Ontario on that accord.

2) Considering that the media has failed 'the smell test' with their national boycott on this 34 year unresolved case and one can see how Canadian Democracy has been imperiled beyond the point of no return.

 

Outlaw

 

MARCH 07-2019

1) 'death by a thousand cuts' best labels the deportation of Huawei's Meng to the U.S. due to a Vancouver Airport apprehension. The damage being done to China's world credibility with the two month delay to the next hearing is immeasurably more than if she were to face criminal charges in the U.S. over Huawei's financial actions. But perhaps that is the point; if Meng gets whacked, two birds are killed with one stone for both Canada and China.

2) The facile arguments of the Meng Defence are just that and only delay the inevitable. For example, University professor, Hassan Diab, was 'marangered' as was I by this Ottawa Justice, Robert Maranger, (currently having troubles with a defence lawyer in another case no doubt due to his reputation) in his deportation to France (neither France nor the U.S. have deportation laws) where he spent two years in a French jail without charge before being returned to Canada where he is suing the pants off the government. I wrote earlier why this case was a set-up with the then Tory Minister of Justice, Rob Nicholson, acting likedy split in breezing Diab out of the country after the failure of his Appeal (Appeal Courts are under the thumb of Justice Canada as I can attest to from the Employee's Case. We both lost our Appeals on the same day to separate Maranger Decisions).

3) Now that an appeal from the Employee's Case due to the failure of President Trump to act has gone out to anyone to publicize this issue; would exposure help China? No. Why? This PLACARD says it best: HYPOCRISY / CANADA DOES IT BEST. China is a 'brittle' society incapable of discerning the niceties - if I may use that word - of democratic countries. Even here, few democratic citizens appreciate that 'Rule of Law' is more than mere rules as it is inextricably tied up with the concept of justice; a main theme in the employeescasecanada.ca  Justice Estey put it succinctly in St. Anne-Nackawic: What must be avoided at all costs, is a significant deprivation of justice under the laws  which did indeed happen in the 34 year unresolved  Employee's Case which led to the collapse of the Canadian Justice System. A frightened Justice System is inclined to buckle down on 'minor matters' such as the Meng deportation in order to maintain face.

 

 

MARCH 13-2019

 

TO: Premiers Moe and Notley via fax: SK: 306-787-0885 / AB: 780-427-1349

cc PMO-Lametti

no copy sent to B.C. Premier Horgan

FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff; 1285 Cahill Drive E #2001  Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7  t./f. 613-521-1739

 e-mail: rcallow770@gmail.com

 

MESSAGE: The following NOTICE appears in SK action forms which is common to all provinces:

NOTICE

 

You are named as a respondent because you have made or are expected to make an adverse claim with respect to this originating application. If you do not come to Court either in person or by your lawyer, the Court may make an order declaring you and all persons claiming under you to be barred from taking any further proceedings against the applicant(s) and against all persons claiming under the applicant(s). You will be bound by any order the Court makes, or another order might be given or other proceedings taken, which the applicant(s) is(are) entitled to make without any further notice to you. If you want to take part in the application, you or your lawyer must attend in Court on the date and at the time shown at the beginning of this form.

 

1) So how does the above jive with 'Saskatooney law' in which a Registry clerk decides NOT to provide a hearing date until they receive a Notice of Appearance from the Defendants? It doesn't as any fool can see - and I include Premier Moe among them as he has been kept apprised of all events with Saskatoon QGB 52 0f 2019 - for no Defendant will ever file a Defense...think Lavscam and the beautiful 'out' this would provide. Further, how does 'slow Moe' expect to play 'ducks and drakes' with SK legal rules and win against the Federal government which are past masters at that game in the looming imposed carbon tax battle? Of course no clerk would ever give such a duplicitous answer without direction from above. In brief, she should be fired...or, alternatively, Premier Moe should step down.

2) The second revision in as many days is being returned to me along with the fee cheque which I had earlier returned to the Edmonton Queen's Bench Registry for a second time. Telephone calls from the court on March 12 and March 13 produced two revisions from this plaintiff which 'still doesn't get it right'.

3) I have never run into a Registry as obstructionist as Edmonton of which, again, I keep Premier Notley fully informed. All Registries - except Edmonton apparently - provide a first name only for reference. The names I received of Edmonton Registry clerks appeared to have been made up on the spot. No clerk would reveal the name of the Registrar... just ask for a Registry clerk, I was told. How can Notley complain about Federal government actions when her own courts function on this basis?

4) I have asked both Premiers to appoint Special Counsel considering the three levels of concern: a) disclosure which lies at the heart of all legalities  b) constitutionality of the imposed BILL 35 (B.C. 1985)  c) fraud on the part of B.C. Chief Justice Hinckson which A.G. David Edy failed to examine. Neither returned a response to this request.

5) The above message reflects the spirit behind this PLACARD: VOTERS / FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER FOOLS

6) No discussion appears complete without a discussion of LAVSCAM in which former Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice, Frank Iacobucci , is their chief council. Trust to the Courts in the criminal case against SNC Lavelin? No way. Lobby the hell out of the government to drop the charge...that's what the Canadian justice system has come to although apart from a few well written letters to the editor, the  vast majority of Canadians are only annoyed that they have been exposed to this perfidy. Isn't that what politicians are for? Keeping everything controversial under cold Canada's deep piled carpets? As for 'whistleblower' (of which appellation I identify) Wilson-Raybould; it is the usual 'death by a thousand cuts' such as the sly observation... 'I bet she would have remained quiet if the 9,000 jobs being cut were for Indigenous people'.

7) More worrying is the resignation of the highly capable medical doctor and former Cabinet Treasury Minister, Jane Philpott,  whose name the disreputable Google has conveniently erased with alacrity from its Cabinet postings along with that of Wilson- Raybould.  Philpott is well aware of working in 'shit-hole' African postings and sees the same thing that I see...a developed country slipping into Third World proportions. In that respect resigned advisor, Gerald Butts is not wrong in supporting top civil servant, Michael Wernick which the media is portraying as a jerk. I submit that it is his cousins which predominate in government and the courts; particularly in the appointment of Chief Justices and probably the Edmonton Queen's Bench Registrar.

8) As to Chief Justices; no court Decision in B.C. - including Huawei's Meng deportation case - merits any credibility until Hinckson's cj 2018 handling of the Employee's Case is resolved which is now a topic for the AB courts. No copy of this letter goes to Premier Horgan due to the abject failure of his A.G. David Edy in that regard.

9) So the demise of three Western provinces as reflected in the respective failures of their Premiers to deal with the employeescasecanada.ca is symbolized by this PLACARD: VOTERS / FOOLS VOTING FOR OTHER FOOLS

10) A word on the anti-employee media running a boycott on this national legal matter is pertinent here. A shot was fired over their bow prompting them to scuttle their version of the SS Titanic without fighting back. As of 2018, they can no longer publish with any credibility as I have closed this case down to the Canadian media.

 

Yours truly,

'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systemic judicial malfeasance supported by government' (Roger Callow)

 

MARCH 15-2019

 

TO: Hon. Ralph Goodale Liberal Deputy Leader and M.P. for Regina-Wascana

by fax: 613-996-9790 (House of Commons)

FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff in Saskatoon QGB 52 0f 2019

t/f: 613-521-1739  e-mail:  rcallow770@gmail.com

 

MESSAGE:

1.  On March 13, I wrote Premier Moe. Part of that account follows: (I did not hear back.)

 

MARCH 13-2019

TO: Premiers Moe and Notley via fax: SK: 306-787-0885 / AB: 780-427-1349

cc PMO-Lametti

no copy sent to B.C. Premier Horgan

FROM: Roger Callow Plaintiff; 1285 Cahill Drive E #2001  Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7  t./f. 613-521-1739

 e-mail: rcallow770@gmail.com

MESSAGE: The following NOTICE appears in SK action forms which is common to all provinces:

NOTICE

You are named as a respondent because you have made or are expected to make an adverse claim with respect to this originating application. If you do not come to Court either in person or by your lawyer, the Court may make an order declaring you and all persons claiming under you to be barred from taking any further proceedings against the applicant(s) and against all persons claiming under the applicant(s). You will be bound by any order the Court makes, or another order might be given or other proceedings taken, which the applicant(s) is(are) entitled to make without any further notice to you. If you want to take part in the application, you or your lawyer must attend in Court on the date and at the time shown at the beginning of this form.

 

1) So how does the above jive with 'Saskatooney law' in which a Registry clerk decides NOT to provide a hearing date until they receive a Notice of Appearance from the Defendants? It doesn't as any fool can see - and I include Premier Moe among them as he has been kept apprised of all events with Saskatoon QGB 52 0f 2019 - for no Defendant will ever file a Defense...think Lavscam and the beautiful 'out' this would provide. Further, how does 'slow Moe' expect to play 'ducks and drakes' with SK legal rules and win against the Federal government which are past masters at that game in the looming imposed carbon tax battle? Of course no clerk would ever give such a duplicitous answer without direction from above. In brief, she should be fired...or, alternatively, Premier Moe should step down....

 

2. Considering your extensive background in government and the law, what is your detailed response to the above issue? Of course no written order is given to that clerk's position so that the legal record blames the Plaintiff 'for not proceeding with the action'. (In fact none of the litigants can get formal legal representation in this case.)

 

3. In the event of non-compliance, the residents of Regina should re-consider their vote for next October's election as democratic Canada will continue its downhill slide into anarchy as the politicians &anti-employee media duck their responsibilities with Goodale leading the way.

 

Yours truly (Roger Callow) The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systemic judicial malfeasance abetted by government in an unresolved 34 year labour case where no compensation has been paid (includes pension rights for 12 years).

 

VOTING IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION THIS FALL?

 

REGINA VOTERS SHOULD CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING

 

While not excusing the B.C. Justice System's use of imposed legislation (BILL 35) 1985 to dismiss a 'whistleblowing' senior teacher in West Vancouver (think imposed Carbon Tax) in a 34 year unresolved legal case, the matter became an inter-provincial concern due to the abject failure of Tory Minister of Justice, Peter MacKay in 2013  (SEE sub-heading employeescasecanada.ca 2019 PETER MACKAY) with his Liberal successor, Jody Wilson-Raybould cementing that failure in 2016.

 

The culmination of that judicial malfeasance is currently being reflected in the personage of Liberal Deputy Minister and Regina M.P., Ralph Goodale, (SEE WEB letter to Goodale  2019 - March 15-2019) in which Saskatooney law as condoned by Premier Moe is changing the entire scope of judicial conduct in Canada at a time when SK is severely challenged with imposed legislation from Ottawa.

 

As Goodale is a past master at the cliché speech, there is little point in challenging him directly hence my challenge goes to the Regina Opposition  Tory candidate, Michael Kram, to directly challenge Goodale over Saskatooney Law.

 

Failure of the Tories to respond has far reaching effects beyond Regina. In brief, should the Tories choose to 'sit this one out'; voters may choose to 'vote with their feet'. Already political pundits are pointing to the '905 vote' north of Toronto to be decisive as was the case in 2015. Where are Regina voters to be placed? Doing nothing is NOT an option.

 

The Outlawed Canadian (Roger Callow) in an outlaw Justice System due to systemic malfeasance abetted by government.

 

 

 

POST IN STAFFROOM

 

MARCH 22-2019

AUTISM

1) A hot button item with the Ford Gov't in Ontario with its threatened cuts to the program.

2) There are gradations in the program so that a mildly autistic student may be able to function in the classroom although my experience is that most cannot as large groups set them off. The school has little option but to send these students home if there is no separate program for them.

3) On the one occasion that I covered an autistic class, I bowed completely to the adult class assistants as keeping students on a regular schedule is all important. In brief, I did exactly what I was told to do which was not the case in other Supply Teacher assignments.

4) Some parents blame inoculations as a source of the rapidly increasing numbers of autistic children and I remember reading the 2010 book on the topic which is widely discounted today. I am open on the situation as inoculations may very well exacerbate an underlying condition. I point to the cocktail of inoculations that the military in the U.S. must take which could also be a contributing factor to the high rate of PTSD and suicide among U.S. soldiers.

5) Beyond the rising numbers of autistic children is that some mothers have more than one child so afflicted hence the conditions of childbirth are a focal area for the source of the condition. For example, pesticides, which Ottawa now bans from lawns and parks, may be a contributory factor. Radiation from hand held wireless phones and tablets could also be a part of the story. In the 1990's, when I installed wireless motion sensors in home alarm systems, some clients asked about radiation which was low dosage in an object well away from people. TV's were a greater threat, particularly for those small children propped up in front of the TV. Modern children are 'indoor' children where there are negative emissions i.e. plastics, whereas outdoor children of the past tend to be healthier.

6) Due to the controversy and public demonstrations, the Ford gov't has seen fit to merely postpone their actions of lowering the financial cost of dealing with autism at great social expense which will reverberate on others in the education system which, if I believe what I am hearing these days, is far more fragile than many would believe. (My recommendation is that no one take up teaching in the current climate as they will only make themselves sick and I saw much of that for some teachers as a Supply Teacher in the 1990's. P.S. QC cannot get Supply Teachers I am told. Certainly as one whom believed in school discipline (r. 2004), I would never survive in today's school.)

7) The Ford Gov't appears to be nickel and diming themselves in this topic and others  in order to make savings which are picayune compared to the massive loss of revenue from the canceled carbon tax from the previous gov't. The developing Depression promises to derail all programs in Canada as governments have to cancel projects on which they have already spent the tax money. This is not the time to listen to the right wing Fraser Institute although it is noted that there is no-one whom has written the book on this one. 'Tighten your belts' was the burping advice of P.M. Bennett in the 1930's with his pot-belly after a scrumptious meal. Some will escape poverty; most will not.