JUMP TO HOME PAGE

 

WORKING COPY

 

GRAND-DADDY OF ALL LEGAL CASES

 

Form 14E

Courts of Justice Act

notice of application

                                                                                                                                                Court File No.

ONTARIO

                   SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE_________

 BETWEEN:

ROGER CALLOW

                                                                                                Self-represented Appellant

and

 

1) Dr. A. Jahagirdar (c/o Towngate Family Medicine)

and

2) Ministry of Transport-Medical File: 001111960

                                                                                                Respondents

(Court seal)

notice of application

TO THE RESPONDENT(S)

      A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED by the applicant.  The claim made by the applicant appears on the following page.

      THIS APPLICATION will come on for a hearing on (day), (date), at (time), at 161 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2K1

      IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, to receive notice of any step in the application or to be served with any documents in the application, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must forthwith prepare a notice of appearance in Form 38A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the applicant’s lawyer or, where the applicant does not have a lawyer, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in this court office, and you or your lawyer must appear at the hearing.

      IF YOU WISH TO PRESENT AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE COURT OR TO EXAMINE OR CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES ON THE APPLICATION, you or your lawyer must, in addition to serving your notice of appearance, serve a copy of the evidence on the applicant’s lawyer or, where the applicant does not have a lawyer, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in the court office where the application is to be heard as soon as possible, but at least four days before the hearing.

      IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU.  IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE.

Date NOVEMBER 22, 2019....................................                Issued by ...........................................................................

                                                                                                                                                                Local registrar

                                                                                                                Address of

                                                                                                                court office ..161 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2K1

 

                                                                                                                                   .........................................................................

 

                       

TO  1) Dr. A. Jahagirdar (c/o Towngate Family Medicine)

2446 Bank Street. Ste. 201 Ottawa K1V 1A4 t.613-739-0998

and

2) Ministry of Transport-Medical File: 001111960

22 Wellesley St. W. Box 589 Toronto, ON M7A 1N3 f.416-235-3400

 

    

application

1.   The applicant makes application for: FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DISCLOSURE FROM BOTH

PARTIES AS THEY RELATE TO THE DRIVER LICENSE SUSPENSION OF THE

 APPELLANT. WITHOUT THE COMPLETE RECORD OF THE APPELLANT'S

 MEDICAL FILE, NO ONE CHARGED WITH TESTING FOR RENEWAL

 PURPOSES MAY ACT.

2.   The grounds for the application are:  THIS CASE HITS AT THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THE

CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS (1982) WHEREIN THE APPELLANT IS

EFFECTIVELY DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW DUE TO THE

PERNICIOUS CO-JOINING OF THE TERMS 'PSYCHIATRIC  CONDITION' UNDER

THE 'HIGHWAYS ACT'  CREATING THE NOTION OF A 'STATELESS CITIZEN'.

NOT ONLY MEDICAL DOCTORS REFUSE TO ACT ON THIS FILE BUT NO LEGAL

COUNSEL MAY ACT ON THE APPELLANT'S BEHALF ON ANY LEVEL

3.   The following documentary evidence will be used at the hearing of the application: (List the affidavits or other documentary evidence to be relied on.) 

EXHIBIT 'A' TIES THIS MATTER INTO A HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL LABOUR

ISSUE CURRENTLY BEING STALLED BY THE PREMIER DOUG FORD

GOVERNMENT

 (NOVEMBER 22-2019)   ROGER CALLOW _________________________

1285 Cahill Drive #2001 Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7 t.613-521-1739

 (Name, address and telephone number of lawyer or applicant)

 

 

     APPLICATION UNDER (statutory provision or rule under which the application is made)

Conspiracy to deprive the Applicant in a most significant manner of medical and

legal representation.

Material as Exhibits included here along with extant File No. 19-SC-155235

(small claims court).

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.

Issues Outstanding

 

 

 

(a)

liability:  quashing  of driver's license suspension  as being ultra vires under the circumstances that it cannot be

 

retestable as implied by the Ministry (See small claims court: 19-SC-155235 included in this document). As matters

 

stand, none of the Parties to this action may acquire legal representation; a preposterous notion. .....................................................................................................................................................................................

 

 

 

 

(b)

damages:  Two million dollars against the Defendants ..........................................................................................................................................................................................

 

Ministry of                          Ministere des                             96343

Transport                               Transports

                                                                                                    Ontario

                                                                              77 Wellesley St. W.  Box   589

                                                                              Toronto, Ontario  M7A 1N3

                                                                              Tel.(416) 235-1773  /1-800-268-1481

                                                                              Fax (416) 235-3400  /1-800-304-7889

                                                                              October  21,  2019

CALLOW,ROGER,W

2001-1285 CAHILL DRIVE

OTTAWA, Ontario K1V9A7

 

Please use this Number  001111960 when  you call or write this office.

 

Dear   Sir:

The  ministry has received a  report(s) indicating that you have a condition that affects your ability to drive safely.

Your reported condition(s)  is(are):

    Cognitive   Impairment

    Psychiatric   Condition

After considering all relevant facts available, the Registrar of Motor Vehicles has decided to suspend your driving  privilege  under:

    Section   47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act

 

An official notice of suspension will be mailed to you under separate cover.  This  action is taken for your own safety and that of other road users. Please note that if you do not hold an Ontario driver's licence (sic),  this action must be taken in  order to prevent you from obtaining or holding a driver's  licence (sic). This is to ensure that you are medically fit for the safe operation of a motor vehicle.

 

What  the  Ministry requires from  you to be reinstated:

 

Take this letter to your treating physician, specialist or nurse practitioner when  your condition improves and have the following  information sent to the Medical Review Section:

 

    The enclosed form(s) completed in full and all questions answered

 

What the Ministry will do when your information is received:

 

    Review  the information provided  against  the national medical  standards

 

THE FOLLOWING CASE is stated for the opinion of the court:

1. IN THIS MOST UNUSUAL OF LEGAL CASES, NONE OF THE LITIGANTS MAY ACQUIRE LEGAL COUNSEL DUE TO A CAPRICIOUS AND PERVERSE ORDER

 FROM THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT - MEDICAL WHICH DEPRIVES THIS PLAINTIFF OF ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS MEDICAL CARE.

 A Small Claims Court Action File no. 19-SC-155235 seeks to quash that aberrant Ministry Order. THE CURRENT ACTION IS DUE TO THE RETURN OF DR.

JAHAGIRDAR'S MEDICAL FILE TO ME IN AN INCOMPLETE FASHION WHICH IS NOW REQUESTED IN ITS COMPLETE FORM ALONG WITH PARALLEL

DISCLOSURE FROM THE TRANSPORT MINISTRY. THE ASSISTANCE OF OTTAWA POLICE CHIEF P. SLOLY HAS BEEN SOUGHT TO CO-ORDINATE POLICE

 FORCES IN TORONTO AND GUELPH (LOCATION OF YOUNGER SON WITH POA OVER MOTHER LIVING IN OTTAWA). THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND

 SURGEONS HAS ALSO BEEN NOTIFIED OF THIS ACTION AND HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY THIS PLAINTIFF TO IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND DR. JAHAGIRDAR AND

 FORBID HER TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY UNTIL THIS MATTER IS RESOLVED. THE RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FROM THIS PLAINTIFF FORMS THE REST OF THIS

 FILED DOSSIER (Set out, in consecutively numbered paragraphs, the material facts of the case, as agreed on by the parties, that are necessary to enable the court to determine the questions stated.  Refer to and include a copy of any relevant documents.)

     

the questions for the opinion of the court are:  EVERYTHING DEPENDS ON DISCLOSURE; NAMELY A COMPLETE MEDICAL FILE FROM DR.

 JAHAGIRDAR ON THIS PLAINTIFF AND MATERIAL FROM THE TRANSPORT MINISTRY-MEDICAL IMPLYING COLLUSION

requisition

TO THE LOCAL REGISTRAR at (place)

      I REQUIRE COMPLETE DISCLOSURE FROM THE DEFENDANTS IN A CONSPIRACY INVOLVING ELEMENTS IN THE PREMIER DOUG FORD GOVERNMENT

 RELATED TO A LONG STANDING LABOUR ISSUE AS SET OUT IN THE INCLUDED MATERIALS IN THIS ACTION  (Set out a concise statement of what is sought and include all particulars necessary for the registrar to act.  Where what is sought is authorized by an order, refer to the order in the requisition and attach a copy of the entered order.  Where an affidavit or other document must be filed with the requisition, refer to it in the requisition and attach it.)

AFFIDAVIT of FACTS

 

I, Roger Callow of the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, swear and affirm the following is true:

1. I turned 65 on August 24, 2006, which brought into play my pension rights;

2. My pension rights are determined on the basis of contributions to the plan, both mine and the employers;

3. The amount of these contributions is dependent on the date of termination of my employment;

4. Because I was a tenured teacher, my employment could only be determined by a proper legal process;

5. In my case the validity of the termination has never been determined. Technically although I was unable to work and was not paid, I remained a teacher under the employment of the Board;

6.I require that a proper termination date be determined, or a settlement be achieved providing me compensation which would include pensionable service benefits;

7. The recent pension inquiries caused me to examine how I could get compensation or a termination date determined. There is no other remedy I can pursue other than as requested in this petition.

8. Whatever approach is made, disclosure as outlined above is at the root of any successful remedy.

 

SEAL: in the Province of Ontario (Ottawa)

on  OCTOBER 18-2018

 

(signed)  ROGER CALLOW _____________________NOVEMBER 19-2019

 

Form 16B

Courts of Justice Act

affidavit of service

                                                                             b e t w e e n:

Roger Callow

Applicant

and

1) Dr. A. Jahagirdar  (c/o Towngate Family Medicine)

and

2) Ministry of Transport - Medical (Ontario)

Respondent

 

affidavit of service

I, ROGER CALLOW, of OTTAWA, ONTARIO  MAKE OATH AND SAY (or AFFIRM):

 (Service by mail as an alternative to personal service)

1.   On  NOVEMBER 19-2019, I sent to the DEFENDANTS 1) DR. JAHAGIRDAR 

2) TRANSPORT MINISTRY-MEDICAL by regular lettermail a copy of the APPLICATION

ASSERTING A CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE PLAINTIFF OF LEGAL

REPRESENTATION

SWORN (etc.)  I, ROGER CALLOW - SELF REPRESENTED PLAINTIFF ASSERT THAT

THE ABOVE APPLICATION MATERIAL WAS MAILED TO THE DEFENDANTS

WITH POST OFFICE RECEIPTS ATTACHED.

(signed) ______________________              ROGER CALLOW   NOVEMBER 19-2019

N.B. Due to the incompetency of the last two Justice Ministers on this file, a

copy of this Application is being sent directly to Prime Minister J. Trudeau and

Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly. The College of Physicians and Surgeons have

been made aware of this Application on the internet: employeescasecanada.ca

2019 - RECENT 5  plus NOVEMBER SUB-HEADING: GRAND-DADDY OF ALL LEGAL CASES

(past and present for all world democracies)

 

                                                EXHIBIT 'A'

                                                                                                                                     

1) 'THE MISSING LINK' Material connecting a labour issue involving

     the Doug Ford Government and the alleged conspiracy of the

     two Defendants a) Dr. Jahagirdar  b) Transport Ministry-Medical 

 

2) MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT-MEDICAL SUSPENSION NOTICE      

 

3) File No. 19-SC-155235 -Nov. 08-2019 (Small Claims Court -Ottawa)

     4 Page Document asking the Driver's License suspension to be

    quashed as it is untestable for re-instatement. No Doctor can deal

    with a 'psychiatric' suspension under the Highways Act (conjoined

    terms) confirmed by other Doctors.

    Nor may any legal counsel be represented for similar reasons.                        

 

3) 4 Pages requesting Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly to co-ordinate

    police forces in Toronto (Transport Ministry-Medical) and Guelph

    (home of younger son, Greg Callow, whom has POA over

    his mother for both financial and medical powers) His computer

    records plus that of older brother, Chris Callow, in Ottawa would,

    in all likelihood, reveal the source of the materials held by

    the Transport Ministry-Medical. The College of Physicians and               

    Surgeons have also been notified with an eye to suspending

    Dr. Jahagirdar and barring her from leaving the country until this

    matter is heard.                                                                                                      

 

4) EXHIBIT 'D'  19-SC-155235 - Nov. 14-2019 plus other materials.

    A detailed response to the returned Medical File from Doctor

    Jahagirdar where she obviously did not consult with a lawyer first

    so that now she has identified herself as a separate legal entity

    in a second legal action filed in Superior Court for $2 million

    damages justifying this action apart from the Small Claims Action

    which names only the corporate body, the Towngate Medical Clinic.                

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 'A' EXCERPTS

(Shows connection between Ford Gov't. and 'suspended license caper')

 

September 17-2018

'RESPONSE' to ON Supreme Court (Ottawa) File number CV 18000 769 0000

Roger Callow v West Vancouver School Trustees (S.D. #45) and two ON judges and an ON legal entity. (WRITTEN JUDGMENT ONLY - Please continue to adjudication as of this request)

BY: Roger Callow  Plaintiff  employeescasecanada.ca 2018   AUGUST & SEPTEMBER sub-headings

FURTHER INFORMATION FROM PLAINTIFF AVAILABLE IN WRITING IF REQUESTED BY THE COURT

MESSAGE:

1) This 'Response' has to be the most unusual legal action in Canadian jurisprudence. It is written by the Plaintiff rather than the Defendant.

2) There have been many court hearings in Canada (8 out of 10 provinces) before over 50 judges amid many accusations of judicial malfeasance by this plaintiff over the past 33 years in which the Employer always filed a Response but not now.

3) The difference lies in the fact that the courts always considered this unresolved  labour matter where no compensation has been paid as a private matter which they invariably ruled as a mere frivolous & vexatious action by this plaintiff. That position was reinforced by the many oversight bodies called by the plaintiff to investigate judicial malfeasance. No such body acknowledged these complaints which would have produced public recognition.

4) Now that the charge is civil fraud for $20 million, the Defendant has filed no response, most likely because no legal firm will represent them under pain of being sued separately for fraud.

5) ON Attorney General Carolyn Mulroney failed to examine this filed case (at the beginning of her mandate) at my request checking as to the validity of an action slipped in by the departing government. Nor did she seek to establish the groundwork necessary to pursue the fraud charge against the two Ottawa Judges (Mckinnon j. and Scott j.) dating back to 2014.

6) The judge handling this case is between a rock and a hard place.

a) As to the fraud charge against the two judges and ON legal representatives for the Employer, Hicks, Morley, et al which abandoned the Employer with my accusations set before the Ontario Legal Society; it is a matter - to use a colorful analogy - of not being any 'skin off my nose' although it may wind up as 'the removal of the hide' from the Canadian Justice System if the court sees fit to duck this one.

b) What is germaine to my issue is the fact that with no filed response, in law my assertions must stand as fact as to the existence of a conspiracy to deprive me of my teaching career.

c) While disclosure is central to this charge of fraud; indeed, the charge cannot proceed without it; nonetheless, the refusal of over 50 judges to provide that key evidence has been at the heart of judicial malfeasance associated with this case. It is submitted here that such publication of this disclosure would lead to criminal charges of fraud brought against the defendant Employer and Union.

d) Without a Defense, the presiding judge may only request - should he deem that disclosure is necessary - that the RCMP, which has been kept fully apprised of this issue for years; seize those documents.

e) If the above action (d) is not activated, the proper course for the judge is to provide this plaintiff with the $20 million default claim which cannot be arbitrated without the Defendants.

Yours truly, (Roger Callow ) Plaintiff

 

TO: PREMIER FORD  by fax (2 pages)

SEPTEMBER 19-2018 - annotated to reflect updates (Oct. 23-2018)

What Premier Doug Ford doesn't know about the Justice System which I have learned the hard way over the past 33 years

by: Roger Callow 'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Government and Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance in an unresolved legal issue.'   employeescasecanada.ca

 

1) Ford is in a position of being 'dead right' and in that order. The point is that if one is first dead, who cares whether or not he is right?

2) It does not appear that Ford is getting very good legal advice; the key one being that one may not be critical of a judge personally due to his decision; that is what appeal courts are for.

3) What a litigant can be critical of is the process by which the court conducted itself. That's why I am able to file a civil case for fraud in Ontario listing two judges with the West Vancouver School Trustees being the 'engine' of this charge for $20 million. No legal counsel will represent the WVST (as well as in B.C. in a second $20 million action) under pain of being sued separately for $20 million. In this unprecedented manoeuvre; two judges are named in the conduct of that fraud along with Ontario legal counsel for the Employer dating from 2014. SEE website for details.

4) What Ford needs and hasn't got is a casus belli to justify his action of reducing Toronto City Council from 48 to 24 seats. (Oct. 23-2018; 'perverted 'court action led to his success)

5) In dealing with the Ford issue above, the presiding Justice is not limited to the 'notwithstanding clause' as many other factors can be cited in dealing with an issue. Indeed, I quoted the Charter on a number of occasions only to be ignored which is the prerogative of the presiding justice. In the unresolved  Employee's Case; the matter was reduced to this litigant merely being frivolous and vexatious on matters already decided. As to which matters were decided, the School Trustees are never specific and, here's the key point, the court does not ever demand that they be specific. That's been the story for 33 years.

6) A side note to the above is that I am dunned for all legal costs which I have never paid considering that I have never received an invoice. The Trustees refuse to say if they paid these bills and the North Shore News Tabloid refuses to challenge them on this level.

7) Other than a personal animus on the part of the Premier, the only thing to warm the cockles of his heart is the loud-mouth braying of the Conservative media bent on selling papers.

8) First past the post is a vital point in law as trying to come from behind leaves a litigant carrying baggage difficult to dispose. Ford already has one court loss. I had the loss of the arbitration dealing with my senior teacher lay-off in 1985 despite the succeeding court quashing the arbitration ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable for failing to show a causal factor (this perp; this crime). I have been left in limbo since that ruling with no judge willing to act to draw a conclusion. In essence, they pick up the ball and go home before the game is completed. That's how the Justice System imploded in 2004 under the 'ultimate remedy' conditions before the Supreme Court of Canada. 'You have exhausted all remedy under the law' volunteered my legal representative.

9)Today, I am 'walking back the cat' with the two charges one being for judicial fraud; a challenge unequalled in the annals of any legal system as I hit directly at 'the process'.

10) It would seem that Ford has not put out the money for qualified legal help and is about to pay the price a second time as judges do not take kindly to any one judge being personally 'dissed'. (Oct.-23-2018: SEE Point 4)

11) For my part, it matters little to my welfare as to which way the winds blow for the Ford Government on this issue. The key advantage is that both of us, in our own ways, have revealed activist judges which have always permeated the system. As I put it; the Justice System imploded in 2004; corpse to follow. The now putrid corpse is currently following in B.C. and ON with the Employee's Case....

 

OCTOBER 23-2018 - SECOND APPEAL: CV 18000 76950  0000 (Ottawa Supreme Court) copy to Ottawa Sun columnist, Mark Bonokoski

1) Considering that the B.C. action mentioned above filed after the Ontario Action has been adjudicated (with much prejudice - see employeescasecanada.ca), why is there a delay in providing a written Decision in Ontario particularly considering that the Employer did not file for an appearance in either case?

2) Also in contrast to B.C. is the fact that the Ontario action lists two Ontario judges whose actions still go uncontested as to malfeasance and were a factor in other venues across Canada.  The Ontario action, also in contrast to the B.C. action, is for civil fraud although production of the disclosure by the highly politicized RCMP would most likely lead to a criminal charge of fraud. Under those conditions, in the event of a successful suit, everything flowing from the imposed BILL 35 (1985) as used by the Employer in an illicit senior teacher lay-off in 1985 would be 'null and void'.

3) At heart of all court actions for 33 years has been the issue of disclosure (as is the case of the criminal trial against Vice Admiral Mark Norman but that trial continues with this difference; I have no media coverage. Is that what Canada has become?...a newspaper democracy?)  Bonokoski, are you listening?

4) The proper course for the Ford government (all correspondence now goes to Premier Ford considering the abject performance of his A.G. Carolyn Mulroney on this file) is to place the Ontario Judiciary under a trusteeship until answers are forthcoming explaining why the above legal case appears to have disappeared down the proverbial black hole.

Yours truly, Roger Callow aka 'outlaw'

 

MARCH 20-2019 - ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: CV 18000 76950 0000

1) The above case is stagnating awaiting a hearing date due to what can only be labeled as the malfeasance of Premier Ford plus his incompetent A.G., Caroline Mulroney abetted by an un-named Registry filing clerk whom refused to provide this plaintiff with a hearing date. What if every court jurisdiction e.g. LavScam  decided on illegally foiling the holding of a trial? 

 

AFFIDAVIT of FACTS

I, Roger Callow of the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, swear and affirm the following is true:

1. I turned 65 on August 24, 2006, which brought into play my pension rights;

2. My pension rights are determined on the basis of contributions to the plan, both mine and the employers;

3. The amount of these contributions is dependent on the date of termination of my employment;

4. Because I was a tenured teacher, my employment could only be determined by a proper legal process;

5. In my case the validity of the termination has never been determined. Technically although I was unable to work and was not paid, I remained a teacher under the employment of the Board;

6.I require that a proper termination date be determined, or a settlement be achieved providing me compensation which would include pensionable service benefits;

7. The recent pension inquiries caused me to examine how I could get compensation or a termination date determined. There is no other remedy I can pursue other than as requested in this petition.

8. Whatever approach is made, disclosure as outlined above is at the root of any successful remedy.

                                                                                                                                   

(signed) Roger Callow - deponent October 18-2018

 

NEWSLETTER - POST IN STAFFROOM (e-mail colleagues)

Exhibit B (19-SC-155235 (Ottawa Small Claims Court)

BY: victim and plaintiff  Roger Callow, Ottawa, November 12-2019. employeescasecanada.ca 2019 NOV.

 

SHERLOCK HOLMES: THECASE OF THE MAD DOCTOR IN PURLOINING THE DRIVERS LICENSES OF HAPLESS CLIENTS (web: employeescasecanada.ca 2019 NOVEMBER Sub-title SHERLOCK HOLMES

cc  President Trump / U.S. columnist, Michelle Malkin / Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly

No copy to Postmedia which has committed itself to the conspiracy. Earlier appeals to the CBC and Epoch Times have ignored the Employee's Case but are invited to write on the much bigger 'Mad Doctor' story. Former ON Premier, Kathleen Wynne / Towngate Medical Clinic

 

BOTTOM LINE: ON Premier Doug Ford must be deprived of all political trappings for condoning the biggest legal scam ever perpetrated over an individual in the creation of a 'stateless person' which negatively impacts all democracies in the world.

 

BACKGROUND to the employeescasecanada.ca PLACARD: NO RULE OF LAW IN  A) CHINA   B)CANADA

1) In 1985, former senior West Vancouver High School Teacher, Roger Callow, was laid-off under the neophyte imposed BILL 35 (reminiscent of the imposed current Carbon Tax) in an unresolved 34 year legal matter where no compensation has been paid (now running $20 million) due to the chicanery of over 50 judges across Canada and the Supreme Court of Canada (4 attempts) whom collectively find this plaintiff's appeals to be frivolous and vexatious.

2) The arbitration favouring the School Board was quashed by the court ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. He had converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with Callow to be the necessary 17th. Justice Mary Southin recommended rather than ordered the return of employment which the Board declined because they refuse to recognize court oversight of imposed legislation.

3) On June 30,1985, the Union gave notice of challenge in a highly publicized environment. On July 15, Stuart Clyne for the Board met and revised their lay-off terms committing, in that process asserted here, fraud, which Justice Southin covered up by returning all minute notes from that meeting 'because she did not use them'. She noted that the entire Board did not vote in July at this illicit meeting (In June, the vote was only two out of five for the resolution (Chairperson Margo Furk and her successor, Mike Smith). In brief, she covered up a massive fraud and over 50 judges have reinforced that fraud by refusing to call for disclosure; the basic request by the plaintiff of the Employer and Union. In brief, I was caught in a 'sweetheart deal' reinforced by courts since 2013 right across Canada in a bid to cover-up the cover-up:

a) B.C. Chief Justice Hinckson responsible for the Meng court delays should have been dismissed by the Horgan Gov't. for his cupidity where the Employer and Union did not file for an appearance.

b) AB I rejected joining a civil class action against specified judges for ethical reasons ( on which the Premier and the media are strangely quiet) for 'kiting' Decisions. Why should the taxpayer bail out these miscreants when the proper action would be to dismiss them and charge them criminally (no judge has ever been fired in Canada which is not a success story).

c) SK On the second trip to corrupt Saskatoon courts (2016 Regina court also corrupt) involving the Employer's lawyer, Vancouver's Harris & Co., a suit against them plus 3 Saskatoon judges has been laid in NB where it festers awaiting a court date. This is a major charge.

d) MB has the most complete case involving 'Natural Justice' which was narrowed to mere disclosure until Premier Pallister spiked the case through his Registry. (Running 'a court within a court' through Registries is standard to all provinces)

e) ON Premier Ford refuses to assign a date to a legal case laid at the time that he ascended to gov't. which probably accounts for his tacit approval of the 'Mad Doctor' story to be defined below.

f) QC The other provinces are bad but QC is unbelievable with their judicial machinations.

g) PEI Limited to solely disclosure from the Union. The court is dragging its feet assigning a hearing date.

h) NS Butchered the constitutional question in 2017 as to whether Court oversight is to be ignored with imposed legislation. School Boards scrapped as one consequence.

BOTTOM LINE: FOR A FIRST TIME IN CANADA, THE NOTION OF SYSTEMIC  JUDICIAL AND GOVERNMENT MALFEASANCE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED EXPLAINING WHY THE FORD GOVERNMENT IS SEEKING TO EXPUNGE THIS WRITER FROM CANADA AS A 'STATELESS PERSON' WITH ITS UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVELY IMPACTING ALL DEMOCRACIES WHICH CANNOT SURVIVE UNDER THESE CONDITIONS.

 

BACKGROUND to the 'Mad Doctor' Story employeescasecanada.ca 2019 RECENT 5 / OCTOBER (end) / NOVEMBER  PLACARD: HERMIT KINGDOMS / A) N. KOREA  B) CANADA

4) Even the North Koreans could not have devised a more diabolical plot than this one.

5) From 'out of the blue' I received a Ministry of Transport notice suspending my driver's license as of October 31 leaving me to get around by walking, cycling and bussing. The quirk in the notice included the term 'psychiatric condition' under the Highways Act. No Doctor or Clinic or lawyer would act with that conjunction of terms leaving me bereft not only of my driver's license where I have a sterling record but with access to any legalities in society. I can't, for example, get a lawyer or Doctor anywhere in Canada. President Trump has been advised to publicize this scourge for criminal elements could turn society upside down if it is not blocked immediately in Canada. That is why I am appealing for public face book publicity. For me, I am in retirement, but what about working people who depend on a car. People I tell this story to are angry and terrified thus immobilizing them which suits the conspirators admirably.

6) But for every force heading to the hills in terms of individuals and institutions (which is the vast majority) - Postmedia, College of Physicians & Surgeons; there are two medical eye Doctors of mine who are willing to provide 'back-handed' support; a vital asset in this kind of battle.

7) On or about October 15, Towngate Family Medicine young Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J., filed an undisclosed driver license suspension with the Ministry of Transport for, she insists, mental reasons (which can be tested) which she won't divulge so I am suing Towngate in a case in which I submit that they will never appear in court. A 'compliant' judge, probably chosen from the 50 plus miscreant judges noted above, will not have either her material or that of the Transport Ministry and hence dismiss the case. It's the perfect storm as now my stateless existence will keep me out of any institution including the courts of law.

ANALYSIS

8) If Dr. J. was concerned about my mental health, she would have requested a psychiatric examination. She would not think of canceling my driver's license under those circumstances.

9) Hence the request and labeling of 'psychiatric condition' came from the ON Transport Ministry whom knew very well what they were doing with information that they had received, in all likelihood from older son, Ottawa contractor Chris Callow, who is familiar with the significance of a driver license suspension. He has already been involved in one caper improperly using the Ottawa police for which I have asked new Chief Sloly to investigate. He should arrest Dr. J. with a criminal charge to keep her fleeing the country for India.

10) Armed with this information, the Transport Ministry inveigled Dr. J. into co-operating with the suspension of my driver's license. She was in a position of conflict representing both myself and my estranged wife (the family are targeting my money) and would not likely accept a family member's request along these lines directly. However, she would trust to the institution of the Transport Ministry not realizing the scam that they were pulling.

11) The above would have to have the sanction  of Premier Ford whom has been sitting on a case of mine for over a year without assigning a court date. That is why he must be driven out of politics as creating 'stateless citizens' is a monstrous crime without equal for any democracy.

12) Public exposure both institutional and individual is all important if Canada and Canadians are to weather the biggest challenge ever wrought to our existence as a democracy.

Yours, in deepest regret,  Roger Callow  'stateless Canadian citizen' 

 

Plaintiff's Claim Small Debt Court  (Ottawa) 19-SC-155235  Nov. 08-2019

What happened?   Mentally Incapable  Person

Where?

When?       (j) on a mentally incapable person,

                    (iii) if there is neither a guardian nor an attorney with authority (my underlining RC)

                    to act in the proceeding, by leaving a copy of the document bearing the person's

                    name  and address  with the Public Guardian and Trustee and leaving an additional

                    copy with the person; (The Public Guardian  and Trustee is disallowed on the same

                    grounds as any medical doctor  or lawyer as the term 'psychiatric disorder is beyond

                    their mandate as well as it appears on a driver's license under the Highway

                     Act (my underlining RC) on October 21,2019  It is the conjunction of both terms     

                    which precludes of any examination,  even by the presiding physician whom  is not

                    a psychiatrist qualified under the Highways Traffic Act nor is there anyone with this

                    designation.

                    The only answer is for the court to quash the Doctor's Order on the grounds that it

                    exceeds her authority as being consistent with the 1982 Charter of Rights and

                    Freedoms  with the emphasis on  Natural Justice in which every individual must 

                    have access to the law in an unfettered sense; something the Plaintiff plainly does 

                   not have here.

                    The inherent right of the court to act on the basis that no other realizable solution

                    exists is the basis of the judge's authority to act.

 

                    Dr. Jahagirdar is a Doctor in the Towngate Medical Clinic, the corporate body 

                    named here in the action citing her personal role as a physician. While I have not 

                    named a compensation  figure in this case self-represented by this Plaintiff, I 

                    submit the court should consider the  upper levels of sums available to it. In that 

                    consideration, If Dr.Jahagirdar never used the term  'psychiatric disorder' with the -

                    Ministry of Transport-Medical appending that classification; that would imply one

                    level of charge. She used the word 'mental' in a telephone conversation to me in 

                    in which she would not reveal her source which is irrelevant to the court as the

                    question is under which circumstances did she accept  this foreign material and 

                    what prompted her to act on it about or on October 15-2019?

 

                    I have deliberately left the Ministry of Transport out of this submission as the

                    Defense can be  expected to produce pertinent material for the court.

 

                    ACTION  REQUESTED

 

                    That a highly experienced Justice with an extensive track record in the ethical side

                    of the 1982 Canadian Bill of Right and Freedoms in terms of Natural Justice be

                    appointed to adjudge the biggest challenge ever presented  in a court of law for 

                    any democracy  in this kafkaesque affair. Quashing the Ministry of Transport-

                    Medical Division of the suspension of the driver's license of Roger Callow appears

                    to be the only possible solution under the circumstances. At the very least, an 

                    injunction should be issued casting this Order into abeyance. Perhaps the Defense 

                    would agree to a retroactive ruling withdrawing Dr. Jahagrdar's Oct. 15 inopportune

  .                 action.

 

                   

                    November   01-2019

                    TO:

                    1) Dr. E. des Grosseilliers EyeDocs optometrist (10 years) by fax: 613-726-3329

                    2) Dr. R. Zabel Ophthalmologist (4 years) by fax: 613-226-8991

                    FROM:

                    Roger Callow - client

                    1285 Cahill Drive #2001

                    Ottawa, ON K1V  9A7

                    t: 613-521-1739 e-mail:  rcallow770@gmail.com

 

                    Background:

                    1) Last Friday, I received from the Ministry of Transport #001111960 dated October

                    21 but received October 25 to be effective October 31, an order leaving me without

                    private automobile transport. Today is my first walking day.

                    2) The two conditions listed from the Ministry were a) Cognitive Impairment b)

                    Psychiatric Condition under Section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

                    3)The suspension was   based on a special submission by  the family Doctor at

                    Towngate Mall, young Dr. A. Jahagirdar(Dr. J.), whom is refusing to identify the

                    material or the source. She has never conducted a psychological test on me. The

                    College of Physicians and  Surgeons has been notified. She is in a position of

                    conflict as both my estranged wife and I are her clients. As she is not a qualified

                    psychiatrist, she may not re-test me. It's a Catch 22 situation.

                    4) Nor is the Clinic willing to provide me with my medical file (including said info

                    above) as I have lost faith in Dr. J. as my medical practitioner. To date, I have been

                    unsuccessful obtaining that file from either Dr. J. or the Towngate Clinic (613-739-

                    0998), the corporate structure.

                    5) The difficulty in re-testing lies with the term 'psychiatric condition'. No other 

                    clinic will re-test with that word nor will a lawyer I contacted take this case under 

                    the 'Highway Act'. I have contacted Kelly Egan of the Citizen to tell this story in 

                    which he has  expressed a decided interest. What if an employed person requiring a 

                    car is a target of this type of nonsense?

                    6) I am involved in a contentious divorce with my estranged wife, Therese, whom

                    currently resides at the Hunt Club Manor (613-690-0121 direct line with male ans.

                    device) and is being cared for with her cancer related disorder.

                    7) So far I have been unsuccessful in having the relatives respond as to whether or

                    not they have any  knowledge of the source of Dr. J's 'special material'. Regrettably,

                    the Ministry has not seen fit to respond to my enquiries on this matter and I have

                    requested  MPP John Fraser  (Ottawa South) to raise the question in the Legislature    

 

                    ACTION  REQUESTED

                    8) I have recently met with you both. Did you detect any psychiatric disorder which

                    would cause you to believe that I was not safe driving an automobile for which 

                    I have a clean abstract? An affidavit to that effect would be greatly appreciated.

 

                    Yours truly, Roger Callow client

                    cc College of Physicians and Surgeons 

 

eyeDOCS Ottawa - Dr. DesGroseilliers

 

       1285 Kilborn  Ave  Ottawa, ON KIH 6K9  Tel (613) 733-4400  Fax (613)  726-3329

 

        8 November  2019

        Re: Mr. Roger   Callow

        DOB:  24 August   1941

        Phone: (613)  690-0121

        OHIP: 4396970917     GC

 

Mr.  Callow presented for a general eye examination on June 11, 2019. 1 have been asked to make a statement regarding his cognitive state at the time of that examination. As the nature of the examination and the extent of my expertise relates to vision and eye care, I am not  in a position to comment on his cognitive state. If the oculo-visual examination process had been hindered  by any type of physical or mental limitations there would have been notes in my records to indicate as such. There are no such notes in my examination records.

 

November 15-2019

TO: Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly

       474 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2E6

and

       College of Physicians and Surgeons - Toronto 'ethics' Division

       80 College St. Toronto, ON M5G  2E2

 

FROM:  Roger Callow Plaintiff against the Towngate Family Medicine Clinic   (corporate body)  2446 Bank St. Suite 201, Ottawa ON K1V 1A4 t:613-521-1739

19-SC-155235  November 08-2019 Additional Exhibits filed Nov.11-15

 

In addition to information provided earlier to both institutions above.

INCIDENT

1) To suggest that the staff of the Towngate Clinic has a rudimentary knowledge of basic legal processes is an understatement.

2) Today, while serving legal material 'by hand' as per an accepted legal process after which I record the action in the downtown Registry, I was met with a chorus of 'trespassing' in which one Doctor unknown to me assaulted me in the hallway. He was prepared to call the police. He would have been far better off calling a lawyer. Should there be a repeat of this type of harassment, charges will be laid by me.

3) Normally, people and institutions turn a filed  action over to their lawyer for a legal response. In this most unusual action, it is possible that neither the Defendant nor this Plaintiff are able to obtain legal help because of a glitch in the Ministry of Transport-Medical rules in which the conjoining of two terms 'psychiatric condition' under the 'Highways Act' precludes of any medical or legal review.

4) If the Clinic in the action where no specific Doctor is named,  had requested legal advice, it is unlikely that even the association of the clinic charge without naming any one Doctor, creates major legal challenges.

5) Be that as it may, if the Clinic were able to retain legal Council, there would be no need for me to  deliver legal material 'by hand' to the Clinic. Until that happens, I have little choice other than to exercise my right to provide 'by hand' as designated in the legal delivery notice forms.

6) Also, I received my medical record from Dr. A. Jahagirdar (Dr. J.) on Nov. 14 with its pejorative comments on this former client where it is clear she breached patient confidentiality in a significant way. Her redacted information 'to hide the names of my detractors' would suggest that a search of the computer records of sons, Chris Callow in Ottawa, and Greg Callow with POA over their mother would lead to charges of criminality for both brothers. I request that Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly co-ordinate efforts with the Toronto police (Ministry of Transport) and Guelph (Greg) for the purpose.

7) By declaring herself a separate legal entity, Dr. J. has unwittingly set herself up for legal action to reach in the seven figures. It is a cardinal mistake of amateurs unfamiliar with the legal system. Even rooky lawyers would not make such a gauche error.

8) I believe the College of Physicians and Surgeons have sufficient evidence to immediately suspend the medical license of Dr. J. until this matter is resolved. She should be barred from leaving the country during that appeal.

9) A copy of this letter is being sent by mail to the Towngate Medical Clinic.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow

 

ADDENDUM: To material sent to Guelph Police, Ottawa Police, and the College of Physicians and Surgeons

 

TO:

1)    Guelph Police Service-Fraud Div. 

        15 Wyndham St. S                                        

        Guelph, ON N1H 4C6                                               

        t. (519) 824-1212     

 

2)   Ottawa Police - Fraud Division                   

        474 Elgin St. Ottawa, ON K2P 2E6

       t. (613) 236-1222

 

3)   College of Physicians and Surgeons

       Doctor Ethics Division

       770 Echo Drive  Ottawa K1S 5N8

       t. (613) 730-8177

 

FROM:

Roger Callow (husband of estranged wife, Therese)

#2001 - 1285 Cahill Dr. E   Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

t: (613)521-1739  e-mail: rcallow770@gmail.com

 

ADDENDUM

At 6:45, Dr. Jahagirdar telephoned me to inform me that the 'psychiatric' appellation on my Ministry of Transport suspension was based on apparent unsolicited material for which she was not prepared to reveal the source nor would she note whether it was from a lawyer. In answer to the question, she is a family Doctor not qualified in psychiatry. I requested that she put tonight's telephone discussion into a letter to which I would arrive at her Office Reception tomorrow to pick up (or not as the case may be - nothing available) at 9 A.M. She did not appear interested in doing anything which would forestall the suspension date of Oct. 31-2019 of my driver's license. As I have already sent material to the Guelph and Ottawa police plus College of Physicians and Surgeons, I am sending this information as an Addendum to those 3 Parties.   Roger Callow

 

 

Exhibit D - File No. 19-SC-155235 (Ottawa Small Claims Court)

November 14-2014  (delivered by hand to Defendant corporate body Nov. 15-2014)

FROM:

Roger Callow (patient of Dr. J. since 2012)

1285 Cahill Drive,

Ottawa, ON #2001

t.613-521-1739

e-mail: rcallow770@ gmail.com

TOPIC: Dr. Anusha Jahagirdar

Towngate Family Health Organization

Suite 201-2446 Bank St.

Ottawa, ON K1V 1A4

t: 613-739-0998  f: 613-739-1485

website: www.mydoctor.ca/towngateatefho

 

MESSAGE:

1) After a prolonged delay, I received my medical records from Dr. Jahagirdar (Dr. J.) dated November 11,2019 to which I will give an annotated response.

2)What is clear is that she did not consult a lawyer and has no idea of the legal significance of the service of legal actions 'by hand'. Nov. 11, 2019 cover letter:

'...As you are no longer a patient of the Towngate Family Health Organization, there is no need for you to visit the clinic premises for any reason and we (Is this the royal 'we'?) request that you abstain from doing so...'

3) You would think that Dr. J. was dealing in high espionage with blackened out material in mid-October from which I now learn that she initiated the request to suspend my driver's license. What is not clear is why she notified sons Chris and Greg to notify me of her actions. That is a break in doctor client relationship. As I am involved in a contentious divorce, neither son saw fit to notify me of Dr. J.'s threats. Perhaps if they had, I could have reacted differently. At any rate, she should have sent a letter to me rather than playing 'ducks and drakes' with her desk staff. In brief, she is an embarrassment to everyone. One is left with the modern impression that she is 'just not into this legal thingy'.

4) A second letter with the same date (November 11, 2019) is unconscionable and I call on the College of Physicians and Surgeons to suspend her license to practice medicine  immediately:

'Further to your letter dated October 31,2019, I am providing you with a copy of your medical record as per section 52(2) of the Personal Health Information Protection Act. Not included in your copy is the ancillary information that led to the report to the Ministry of Transportation and the identities of the individuals that provided the information in confidence. (The plural suggests our two sons, Chris in Ottawa and Greg in Guelph RC).

Given the nature and content of the information, granting you access to that portion of your medical record may result in a risk of serious harm to your treatment regarding your cognition and mental health (codswallop! RC) and/or may result of harm to another person ( I am non-violent, even towards my former wife whom lives elsewhere and no longer has any physical contact with me. RC) and would lead to his or her identification. (I sincerely hope so! Again, there is a breach of ethics regarding the suggestion of improper discussion of my file with others. RC)...

5) While the medical file for seven years is copious, the key is my cognitive scan at the Bruyere Center in 2016 which did not notice any aberrant cognitive features; certainly nothing psychiatric. The test is recommended every five years for seniors to measure decline and, as noted in the records, that is minimal for a 78 year old. Cognitive reports run by Dr. J's assistant are positive with no suggestion of a psychiatric condition.

6) The 'blacked out' sections are between September 9, and September 24, a good month after my physical examination where there was no hint from Dr.J as to psychiatric difficulties.

Something happened and it appears that the Transport Ministry-Medical decided to capitalize on material which they received from Dr. J. plus other sources bringing into the focus Premier Ford and his tacit approval of the most pernicious legal action ever committed in a democracy by creating this target as a 'stateless person'.  On Oct. 15,2019, a note without details reads: Ministry of Transport Medical Condition Report complete plus faxed Received Oct 19,2019 (presumably by the Transport Ministry) Dr. J. insists that it was the Transport Ministry which assigned the term 'psychiatric', not her hence the role of Premier Ford looms large: '...I have clarified with you that it is not my role to determine the status of your license; this is decided by the Ministry....'

7) My letter of Oct. 28-2019 from her file is included here and is reflective of an untenable position, I submit, that Dr. J. could not extract herself from although she has chosen to do so without first seeking legal advice. For example, the action is against the corporate body, Towngate Family Medicine where her personal name was scratched out by the court clerk to make the action suited to filing purposes.

8)  It is incumbent that the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Toronto (ethical considerations) co-ordinate their action with Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloly in conjunction with the Guelph police and Toronto police (Ministy of Transport-Medical) to stop the creation of 'stateless individuals' in a conspiracy without equal for any democracy. At any rate, Dr. J. should be prohibited from leaving the country until this legal matter is sorted out.

 

 Yours truly, Roger Callow Plaintiff 19-SC-155235 Ottawa Small Claims Registry

 

cc Ottawa Police Chief P. Sloley; College of Physicians & Surgeons (Toronto)

incl. copies of letters from the Plaintiff as filed in Dr. J.'s medical file (7) including the Transport suspension.