The current challenge is to this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister.
Photo for press purposes
RECENT4 Schrodingers Cat RED NECK MEDIA 2017 & 1985 JUDGING JUDGES BOYCOTT ORIGINS TRUDEAU-HARPER THE MISSING LINK UNIONS EMPLOYMENT LAW HANGING LETTER PREMIER.WYNNE(ON) B.C.TEACHERS.FEDERATION SUPREME COURT OF CANADA JUDGES JANUARY-2018 B.C. Court (fraud charge) MB 'Legal Apology' THE FOURTEENTH COLONY FEBRUARY-2018 PATRICK BROWN( ON TORY) PEI REGISTRY OBFUSCATION BILL.NYE,THE SCIENCE GUY MARCH-2018 RCMP MANITOBA-2018 APRIL-2018 IMPOSED LEGISLATION CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION (ON)
Pierre Elliot Trudeau (1919-2000) '...Every government must accept responsibility for the rights of the citizens within its own jurisdiction. Canada as a whole suffers when any of her citizens is denied his rights, for that injustice places the rights of all of us in jeopardy.'
Justice Estey (St. Anne-Nackawic) What must be avoided at all costs, is a fundamental deprivation of justice under the law
' Something has to be terribly, terribly wrong with the courts to use the "notwithstanding clause" Stephen Harper'
"There is, P.M., there is" The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance. To date the government, politicians, courts of law plus anti-employee media would boycott this national story as a 'Roswell' fantasy. It is anything but.
It is the (West Vancouver) School Board's strongly held view that the Labour Relations Board has no jurisdiction to make any ruling regarding the hearing of a future arbitration hearing due to the fact that the arbitration was not a proceeding under the scheme provided in the Labour Relations Code, the former Industrial Relations Act, or the former Labour Code. Indeed, the arbitration in question was a hearing pursuant to the provisions of the School Amendment Act, 1985 (imposed BILL 35 - RC), which the Labour Relations Board has no jurisdiction to interpret or apply. SEE employeescasecanada.ca 'HANGING LETTER' for full text
SEE RED NECK MEDIA - 2018 and the rebuttal to the Halifax Examiner (Nov. 4-2017) and how the court (469918 Nov. 28) handled the single most important challenge to the Canadian Judicial System: 'Does the Canadian Judicial System have oversight powers on imposed legislation?' The West Vancouver School Board which has not paid any compensation in the Employee's Case for 32 years answers in the negative. All employees are negatively affected; both union and non-union clients.
Union leaders are fixated on control. For example, they opposed the creation of the Ontario Teachers College in 1990 which drove the pedophiles out of the profession. (recently NY & NJ union leaders rejected any examination of pedophile charges). Recently ON CUPE in 2017 won a $57 million settlement for educational workers in Ontario but which individual teacher has the resources and time to challenge a faulty ruling? Regrettably, the teachers failed to support my case (I absorbed all costs) in Nova Scotia which is broader based than the 'collective bargaining rules'. For example, by restructuring the schools through imposed legislation, Opposition Tory leader in Alberta, Jason Kenney, can eliminate senior teachers collecting twice the salary of beginning teachers. Any province may follow suit.
POST IN STAFFROOM / e-mail colleagues