JUMP TO HOME PAGE

NEWSLETTER - SEPTEMBER 2018

CANADA'S PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL TEACHERS

 'DOING NOTHING IS NOT AN OPTION'

QUOTE: A) In time, even the most carefully woven lies unravel. All it takes is a loose thread. Or a man who feels compelled, for reasons of honor, or perhaps out of a sense of debt, to bring the truth to light. House of Spies  Daniel Silva  B) Lies grow bigger, not smaller ,over time

1) The Canadian Justice System imploded over the 1985 West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off of Roger Callow under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35. No compensation has been paid due to the malfeasance of over 50 judges across Canada including 4 trips to the       Supreme Court of Canada. SEE  employeescasecanada.ca

2) While teachers have been appealed to through these newsletters, there has been no response no doubt due to discouragement from Union leaders with a vested interest in the 'sweetheart deal'.

3) If you are in receipt of this newsletter, don't just do nothing. Organize a web site: Professional Teachers Against imposed Legislation or do your bit by contacting colleagues or making use of such as facebook.

                                                                        DOING NOTHING IS NOT A PERSONAL OPTION.

 

NOVA SCOTIA

4) A constitutional question regarding court oversight was 'mangled' by NS courts in 2017. The Employer does not recognize court oversight of imposed legislation which, in this case, quashed the arbitration under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35. President Trump was called in to apply the Magnitsky Act (moral and legal turpitude) since it may not be applied internally. Since then, NS school boards have been canceled leaving local teachers vulnerable to imposed legislation.

PEI

5) Senator Duffy of PEI was called in to deal with legal inequalities in a province in which a sly Premier holds both the position of Premier and Attorney General. Duffy would rather sue the Federal government for millions than to tend to the needs of teachers locally.

6)  QUEBEC 

'Ran a court within a court' which led to a SCofC challenge not heard: 306683. Unions on backburner in Oct 2018 election. Their influence keeps tuition fees down while such as Student Council corruption at Ottawa U. keeps ON. fees high.

7) ONTARIO

 Source of the fraudulent Colin McKinnon j. Decision (13-59060) laid by Employer in which at least two Decisions from 2014 are extant which do not reference the other. This action runs through all courts. Currently subject to fraud charge along with Employer : (CV 18000 769 0000) Teachers subject to 'snitch' line on teaching new Sex Ed program. All Canadian teachers would do well to see my web: 2018 RECENT4 August 22 on steps to protect yourself, particularly ON elementary teachers.

SASKATCHEWAN

8) Premier Moe has been asked to support the constitutional question as he has a direct interest in the Carbon Tax. Earlier SK court use Under Premier Wall led to SCofC Appeal 306993 also not heard similar to QC. The SK Law Society is sitting on a time bomb regarding events in that province under Wall.

BRITISH COLUMBIA

9)  B.C.'s Premier Horgan is throwing his weight on the side of the conspirators. A fraud action is registered against both the Employer and Union (S188996). Teachers advised to join CUPE and place all School Districts 'in dispute' until this fraud case is heard.

 

SPREAD THE WORD - YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE

 

SEPT. 01-2018 - B.C.'s Battle over BILL 28 and BILL 22 under Christy Clark gov't.

Justice Donald was critical of the majority’s disregard of Justice Griffins’ findings of fact about the province’s conduct and lack of good faith. He noted that she reached her conclusions after a very lengthy hearing, and that there were no apparent palpable or overriding errors. He concluded that he would have ruled that the collective bargaining agreement provisions on class sizes, composition, and other working conditions be reinstated into the collective agreement.

my comment: At one time in B.C., I had Justice Donald sit on a 3-person Appeal Court and described to me as a capable judge. It was his angry voice I heard from the back room to which the panel had retired before giving me a complete rejection. Here, Donald j. is the lone dissenter to the Appeal Court (under the crooked Christy Clark gov't.) in support of Griffin j. of the lower court whom supported the teachers. The Supreme Court of Canada in 2017 reversed the Decision of the Appeal Court and re-instated the Griffin j. Decision. It would not have happened if it were not for that one honest judge although I did not benefit from his largesse. With that much said, B.C. teachers should dump their Union (for CUPE?) and place all School Districts into dispute over the imposed BILL 35 which has left my senior teacher lay-off in 1985 unresolved where no compensation for 33 years has been paid. I didn't get an honest judge in the ensuing court challenges (over 50 judges including the SCofC on 4 occasions leading to the current fraud charges in B.C. (employer and union) and Ontario (employer and two judges). At heart of both civil fraud cases is disclosure (June 1985 School Board meeting notes denied me by the Employer and Union) which will undoubtedly lead to the RCMP (with their tiny bladders) having no other choice than to lay criminal charges of fraud. As no legal representation for either the Employer or Union has been made, I have modified my order to naming the incumbent Chairperson of the WV School Trustees, Carolyn Broady, to appear in Vancouver Court on pain of being held in contempt if she is not represented in court. The same applies to the incumbent BCTF President,  Glen Hansman, whom is also named. As any lawyer appearing on their behalf is likely to lose his license, it would seem that these two are on their own although both could avoid contention if they produced their respective copies of disclosure to me. As a Union client, I have a right to that information which was purloined from me.

     All across Canada, the theme is the same, the expected glut of teachers has turned into an exodus for a number of reasons. Schools are having to re-open this fall without teachers. Stories of violence in the classroom is foremost which exists quite apart from the legislative matters above. In this Canada is not an exception. French Immersion teachers are at a premium and lotteries are being used in such as Vancouver for favoured treatment. My advice to prospective teachers? Stay away.

SEPT.01-2018

O.C. p.C14 Workplace Law  'Howard Levitt'  No doubt 'our Howard' considers me an internet troll while I consider him a legal troll in a business falling into oblivion as denoted by its 'you don't pay until we get paid' advertisements. From my own 33 years experience in the court in an unresolved labour matter, I consider him to be a poor lawyer. There is no denying such facts as that the current financing of education is unsustainable wherein the cost in ON has mushroomed by 80% in the past decade where the student population has remained static. But Levitt fails in the details of bringing such costs into line which is his own bailiwick. No-one has greater criticism against a major Union than do I but I do not Union bash as is a general feature with Levitt. For example, which forum is Ford to use in enforcing his sex-ed curriculum without incurring mammoth financial costs where the cure is worse than the disease? Further, the teachers have the support of School Boards on sex-ed. Levitt should stick to creating new 'billable time exercises' such as he is doing currently by getting one professor to take his academic argument against another professor to court; in essence the definition of University professor relationships. However, Levitt is allotted media recognition while my views are censored by an ant-employee media. P.S. Why don't you break the boycott, Howard, by writing up the Employee's Case? ...and see how long you keep your media job.

 

SEPT.02-2018

NEWSLETTER

employeescasecanada.ca 'Walking back the Cat'

The story of the unresolved 33 year-lay off of senior West Vancouver Teacher, Roger Callow, in June of 1985 under the auspices of the imposed BILL 35. No compensation has been paid due to the malfeasance of over 50 judges. Current action is focused on fraud which takes precedence over all other laws as well as having no time limits. The theme is 'walking back the cat' as acts of judicial malfeasance are re-filed with the replacement of the political Party in power.

 

QUOTES: A) '...like germ warfare, no one wants to risk using an uncontrollable weapon that may in due course be used against oneself' Yes,Minister BBC series 1990's  my comment: With the laying of two fraud charges in the Employee's Case, we now move into the 'germ' stage.

B) '...I (President Trump) would rather have fake news than have anybody (anti-employee media boycott of Employee's Case) - including liberals, socialists, anything - than have anybody stopped and censored, he said. But...you can't have censorship. So we'll  have fake news, I mean, I hate it, but we have no choice. Because that's by far the better alternative...We believe in the right of Americans to speak their minds.' as reported in the Epoch Times Aug.30-Sept.5 p.A2  my addition: and in Canada for the media not to willfully participate in censorship of bureaucracies such as the Justice System.

 

1) Two civil fraud cases; one in B.C. and the second in ON, with a third one looming due to the failure of the Defendants to Reply. In law that is wryly known as 'not responding to your legal mail'.

2) In actual fact, the Canadian Justice System imploded in 2004 with the failure of the Supreme Court of Canada to finalize this case under 'ultimate remedy'. In civil cases, one must place a dollar figure on a claim and it is incumbent on the court to decide on conflicting accounts on this basis. Else what's a Justice System for?

3) Until the laying of fraud charges recently, the Judiciary wrote this case off as a private matter between myself and the defendants which would not have been the case if the many charges of malfeasance that I made to the oversight bodies had acknowledge my complaints in various provinces. That takes organization  which, I submit, occurred through a nation-wide conspiracy involving Chief Justices and their appointed minion judges.

4) Hence the laying of fraud charges is a way of 'walking back the cat' on those overlooked charges of malfeasance. One example will suffice. In ON in 2014, Ottawa Supreme Court Justice Colin McKinnon wrote two Decisions on a single case without referencing each other. If he had been investigated in 2014, I submit that he would not be sitting on the bench today. He is named in the fraud case in ON with the incompetent A.G. Carolyn Mulroney not recognizing the charge. McKinnon j. has recently been pilloried in the press for ameliorating the charge against a 'very nice pimp' (What did he do? Offer the good judge a 10 coupon book for free blow jobs?). My point is that he should not be sitting on the bench until the fraud charge against him plus a second judge is heard. I could repeat this scenario in a number of other provinces where I have not so much created the issue of court corruption as to revealing an extant reflection of just how the Canadian courts operate.

5) Can I expect an honest handling of these fraud charges in court? Absolutely not which is why I need publicity which is not forthcoming from an anti-employee media which runs a boycott on this central Canadian issue. Hence my aim is to attract a group of professional teachers (anywhere in Canada - union leaders need not apply) to mount an independent web site entitled; PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS AGAINST IMPOSED LEGISLATION. Of course they would reference my case; but they would have a much broader mandate to deal with such as the eradication of School Boards (e.g. N.S.) or with ON's snitch line for teachers caught teaching other than the regulation sex ed course. With the decline of the Union influence, they could fill the void of lobbying  government and political parties.

6) Will the judicial cat of 9 lives sacrifice their last life? Count on it. Both fraud cases depend on disclosure which is the essence of habeas corpus and our system of law. Both civil cases will never go to civil trial, it is asserted here, because once I have such disclosure (meeting notes of the School Board and Union  in 1985); it is assured the matter will be displaced by criminal fraud charges by the RCMP. To date, Commissioner Brenda Lucki and the Montreal fraud squad appear to be waiting for the go-ahead from their civilian masters.

7) That's why a carefully re-structured third fraud charge will have to be laid. Currently my choice is SK where Premier Moe is being challenged as well by me to support my ex parte constitutional question regarding imposed legislation. If he cannot do that, this legal neophyte should drop his sole challenge to the carbon tax. Of course the lawyers will point out to him that without a 'costed case' which depends on provincial figures which they will have a tough time getting, the Feds can expect to have their case thrown out of court (after 5 years of expensive litigation). In the interim, the Feds will punish SK with other federal spending cuts in much the same way Trump wields his unsanctioned tariffs. Providing 'intervener status' may not stop the Federal juggernaut but at least Moe will have a viable stand. Going in blind to a Canadian court on an issue like this is the height of foolishness. AB, for example, is copping out of the carbon tax because it was contingent on the Kinder Morgan pipeline being built. To date, the worst kind of civil servant in SK returned my ex parte documents because she did not understand them. Whether she was directed to do that is not the point; if one civil servant does not understand an issue; professionalism decrees that the advice of a specialist is sought. Premier Moe should ask for my information to be returned on this topic.

8) To be sure there are others negatively impacted on the above level in the teaching profession and to that extent my lack of success undermines their efforts. An organization such as the one I suggest - PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS AGAINST IMPOSED LEGISLATION - can keep them from having to fight injustice in our courts 'with two hands tied behind their back'.

Think on it...and then act....

 

SEPT.03-2018

Y is for Yesterday  Sue Grafton

 

image002

 

QUOTES: (Y is for Yesterday)

A) '...Not to my editor. If you ask me, this whole story is epic and deserves to be told beginning, middle, and end...So far the ending is missing....

B) '...Here's the trick...Better yet, tell 'em you'd like to hear their version of events before you go to press. Say your editor wants an update and he suggested you talk to them....' In late April of 2014, the Ottawa Citizen reporter Andrew Duffy unsuccessfully tried to contact me one day before publication knowing`full well that the article on the duplicitous Colin McKinnon j. (now known as the 'very nice pimp' judge) account had already been posted on the internet two days previously.

 

MESSAGE: employeescasecanada.ca

1) Similar to Grafton, I was known to ferret out information...as one colleague put it; "You are very good at finding things out". That's what cost me my job as the hierarchy is always very sensitive to people nosing about. No other teacher whom I have encountered comes anywhere near that level of skill although one or two ask the right question which can be delineated into 3 parts: a) the question to be asked  b) of whom to ask the question and c) actually doing it. I do all three.

2) The local Union thought they had me stitched up with their 'sweetheart deal' as I could not contest my senior teacher lay-off without Union permission. Due to widespread proselyzing by the parent Union that the imposed BILL 35 was the 'battle of all teachers' knowing full well that it was to be the battle of only this teacher (they 'threw' the arbitration), an arbitration was called which I lost.

3) I changed lawyers and won in court to the extent that the arbitration was quashed with the arbitrator ruled patently unreasonable. I was left in limbo where I have been for the last 33 years without compensation (includes pension rights as the WV School Board did not acknowledge my retirement at age 65 (I am now 77). In effect, I am an unpaid member of the School Board awaiting 'deferred salary' which has been thwarted by over 50 judges including 4 inconsequential trips to the Supreme Court of Canada.

4) In bottom line language, what happened was that the conspirators inveigled the Justice System to support them and this blog is a history of how it fell on its own sword in the process.

5) The pretense that the Employee's Case is a private matter was all that was sustaining this 'deck of cards' considering that there was no oversight body willing to investigate many acts of judicial malfeasance.

6) As the RCMP (Montreal Fraud Dept.) are unwilling to investigate widespread criminal activity in this case, I am limited to laying civil fraud cases in B.C. and Ontario with a third one looming should any legal counsel for the School Board and Union (B.C.) put in an appearance. In Ontario, only the School Board is named along with the names of two ON Supreme Court judges (McKinnon j. and Scott j.)

7) The key to both trials is disclosure which the defendants have refused, with judicial support, to provide for 33 years. It is a reasonable conclusion that this disclosure (minute notes of the June 1985 WV School Board notes which Justice Southin called for in 1986 and returned because she did not use them would demonstrate criminal intent. Even the RCMP could not deny that one. To date they are unwilling to seize this disclosure material.

ADDENDUM

8) Herein lies my advice to any teacher challenging a School Board dismissal. Pay $10,000 (?) paid out of your own pocket for your own legal counsel to parallel the Union lawyer. If I had done that, I would have dismissed the Union lawyer and had the Trustees take the stand to attest to lay-off numbers which was the key to BILL 35. I doubt whether any of those 5 Board members would have been willing to commit perjury particularly as the enrolment increased with new teachers hired. I was slated for a full course of studies two days before the lay-off letter.

9) I have kept teachers across Canada periodically informed of this legal saga; the one for September now posted.

10) Whom are these Newsletters directed to? Those who complete reading the one page message (less than 10%?) It is to those individuals to whom I direct my request that a blog TEACHERS AGAINST IMPOSED LEGISLATION operating apart from the Unions as well as my own blog must be created.

11) The B.C. Teachers came very close to losing their collective bargaining rights under the corrupt Christy Clark government. If it had not been for Justice Donald (I had him on one Appeal. He was described as a capable judge; the only one I have had) writing the dissenting opinion, to be sure SCofC Justice Suzanne Coté writing for the minority would have won the day (Along with her QC counterpart, Richard Wagner now the Chief Justice, these two worthies saw fit to sit on two SCofC rejections (QC 26883 & SK 26993)for my Appeal much to my vehement objection which, due to a media boycott, is kept from the public. PLACARD: IMPEACH SCofC CHIEF JUSTICE R. WAGNER  The  B.C. Union, in my books, was just plain lucky. To be sure, that will not be the case next time. The Teachers should model their blog on the NRA (National Rifle Assoc.) in the U.S. considering that the Canadian Justice System imploded in 2004 over this case with the corpse to follow which is indeed happening now with my fraud charges.

THE DARKER SIDE OF `Y IS FOR YESTERDAY

12) Almost all novelists including playwright William Shakespeare `lose it` about 3/4 of the way through the story as what begins as an arm chair thriller becomes - in the author's imagination - something to sell as a movie complete with its gratuitous plotting accompanied by gratuitous violence. For example, when Detective Mulhone has an opportunity to plug a psychopathic killer to death, she decides to only get in one shot so a wounded killer continues on with further depredations. Further, she was hired by the mother of a boy whom spent 8 years in prison for murdering a fellow student and is now being blackmailed with a video showing rape. The mother wants to neutralize the blackmail without understandably going to the police and seeing her son additionally charged with rape. But here is the overlooked point. Grafton, as detective, views the tape but does not turn the evidence over to the police as she is bound to do as an authority figure. Rather, she has the mother firing her so that she can write a snarky dismissal note and return the entire deposit so any money trail is 'neutralized'. ...or is it? She has acted, in essence, as judge, jury, and executioner with her so-called exculpatory action. I mention this anomaly because that is exactly the kind of treatment that I have received by over 50 judges in my unresolved Employee's Case.

13) Grafton's opening gambit on the private school system is a real hoot, and to think that in Canada, only indigenous people complain of private school abuse. At root of the problem? Drugs and booze coupled with parents whom are actually 'children raising children'. Not for those parents any 'you made your bed, so lie in it'. No, no. Instead, you get more paramours and repeat the problem as Advice Columnist Ellie Tesher repeats ad nauseam every day.

 

SEPT. 04-2018 -SEE Sept. 24 update

 

ON August  26-2018, I wrote:

TO  1) B.C. Teachers Federation                                FROM: Roger Callow aka 'Outlaw'

e-mail: presidentsoffice@bctf.ca                                           e-mail: thecallows@ gmail.com

1 page                                                                                      employeescasecanada.ca

2)  Board of School Trustees (WVST)                         

(S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.)                               

1075-21st Street, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 4A9                 

tel: 604-981-1000   fax: 604-981-1001    sent by fax

To whom it may concern:

1) Whom are your respective appointed legal counsels for Vancouver Supreme Court 

S 188996? You are going to put in an appearance, aren't you? = third fraud case

2) Are you going to provide me with disclosure in a timely manner (outlined in previous accounts) and avoid embarrassment  to the court? 

...etc.

September 04-2018

1) I still have not heard from either Party as to Representation. If you wish me to alter the court  forms to read WVST Chairperson, Carolyn Broady and BCTF President, Glen Hansman, as Defendants,  you will have to notify me accordingly ASAP.

2) To date, there appears no notice to contest either of the two civil fraud cases in B.C. or ON. Nor is any inclination shown to provide the necessary disclosure on which the $20 million claim is to be based in both venues.

3) The presiding Justice appointed to hear this case in B.C. is in an intolerable position if the above disclosure is not made available to me. While previous judges escaped charges of malfeasance due to the claim that this was a personal dispute; in actual fact we don`t know how the oversight bodies would  have viewed that argument as no oversight body, including the RCMP, was willing to acknowledge the many transgressions by court bodies and lawyers.

4) The current presiding Justice is faced with the challenge of fraud and should expect to be pursued to the fullest extent of the law should he or she seek to emulate the earlier judges.

5) The choices are clear for the presiding judge:

a) the above defendants are asked to give up the disclosure documents willingly

b) the presiding Justice orders those documents to be produced

c) the presiding Justice orders the RCMP (Montreal Fraud Division) to seize those documents.

d) at the very least, as the Union client directly impacted, I have a right to the Union`s copy which I claim was purloined from me.

6) I will wait a few days more awaiting your respective responses.

7) As matters now stand, if you do not put in an appearance, then by law my assertions must stand as fact. The only alternative for the presiding Justice should he or she deny a)-d) above is to provide the $20 million as forfeiture with the court deciding on how that would be divided between the two defendants. No other amount is acceptable.

8) Without a response, I will instruct the court to proceed to final judgment in writing only. Any further information required by the court would be limited to written arguments between solely myself and the court.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow)

  

cc RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki / B.C. Attorney General D. Edy

 

SEPT. 07-2018 -SEE Sept. 24 Update

 

ON August  26-2018, I wrote:

TO  1) B.C. Teachers Federation                                FROM: Roger Callow aka 'Outlaw'

e-mail: presidentsoffice@bctf.ca                                          

1 page                                                                                      employeescasecanada.ca

2)  Board of School Trustees (WVST)                         

(S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.)                               

1075-21st Street, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 4A9                 

tel: 604-981-1000   fax: 604-981-1001    sent by fax

To whom it may concern:

1) Whom are your respective appointed legal counsels for Vancouver Supreme Court 

S 188996? You are going to put in an appearance, aren't you? = third fraud case

2) Are you going to provide me with disclosure in a timely manner (outlined in previous accounts) and avoid embarrassment  to the court? 

...etc.

On September 04-2018, I wrote:

1) I still have not heard from either Party as to Representation. If you wish me to alter the court  forms to read WVST Chairperson, Carolyn Broady and BCTF President, Glen Hansman, as Defendants,  you will have to notify me accordingly ASAP.

2) To date, there appears no notice to contest either of the two civil fraud cases in B.C. or ON. Nor is any inclination shown to provide the necessary disclosure on which the $20 million claim is to be based in both venues.

...etc.

September  07-2018

1) As I have not heard from either of the Defendants, I am submitting this case to be handled by the court in writing devoid of your arguments. Your final due date to communicate with me is September 14-2018 after which I will ask the court to render a written decision based solely on the information  provided by me to the court noting that should the court require further information, they may make a written request only to me or the RCMP for the purpose.

2) Considering the importance of this fraud case, special attention by A.G. D. Edy to the appointment of a highly proficient judge with an established reputation is required. (I have had enough of bozo decisions from the bench regarding the `personal matter` to which they would relegate this case.) The matter is now one of fraud. Should the court now demand disclosure, they will be limited to the services of the RCMP. The unchangeable default payment is for $20 million to be paid within 30 days. Without a challenge, by law my case must stand as fact in asserting that fraud is indeed the case.

3) Unless I hear from both Defendants by September 14, there will be no further communication with either defendant by me nor, for that matter by the court unless they obtain the necessary legal authority from A.G. Edy for the purpose. (The NDP future provincially and federally is at stake with this hearing.)

4) Of course it is understood that any 'unfinished' court result would include placing this plaintiff back on salary from 1985 with all conditions of the contract to apply.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow) Plaintiff  S 188996

 

cc  B.C. Attorney General D. Edy

 

September 07-2018

 

TO: President Trump                     FROM: Roger Callow aka 'The Outlawed Canadian'

c/o U.S. Embassy (Ottawa)                       employeescasecanada.ca

 

QUOTE: A) '... I'm not saying justice is for sale, but if you have enough money  (or power - R.C.) you can sometimes enjoy the benefits of a short-term lease.'  Y is for Yesterday  Sue Grafton

B) 'Canadians are sly'  Donald Trump

 

MESSAGE:

1) How sly you ask? If the Employees Case Canada is any example having been in 8 out of 10 provinces, and I submit it is, the Justice System is not merely sly; rather, it is downright corrupt. The many legal trade wars Canada wins over the U.S. should, in so  many words, be taken with a big grain of salt.

2) That judicial slyness or procrastination in the above case consisted for 33 years before over 50 judges of claiming this unresolved 'personal labour case' where no compensation has been paid, is all due to the vexatious behaviour of this plaintiff.

3) As no oversight body was prepared to acknowledge egregious judicial conduct in all hearings, no accusations of fraud by this plaintiff exist on the judicial record (which falls in the middle of a very selective forest not making any noise). Media cover-up is very much at root of this malfeasance conducted by both legal and government forces in this case.

4) ...until now with the laying of fraud charges by 'walking back the cat' threatening any legal counsel for the Employer and Union with a separate fraud charge for past misdeeds in the event that they represent the Defendants. In short, those two entities are badly exposed without legal representation as now the presiding justice must act on his own in S 188996 Vancouver Supreme Court Registry. SEE website: SEPTEMBER-2018

5) Canada will not permit the Magnitsky Act (moral and legal turpitude) to be invoked internally explaining why I turned to you to invoke this Act against Nova Scotia Supreme Court Judge P. Rosinski (469918-2017) whom rejected a constitutional question on imposed Legislation without any mention of the existence of that issue in his judgment. A  legal representative in Ontario was unable to elicit what was actually filed for the judicial record ('misfilings' are not uncommon in this case but, as pointed out above, oversight bodies are amazingly myopic in their duties).

6) Granted that a Canadian labour case is unlikely to elicit much interest in the U.S.; nonetheless, that is not the case with the current application of fraud as all international investors now have a direct vested interest in the credibility of Canadian courts.

7) Will President Trump be the one to blow the whistle on 'sly Canadians' or will that be left to someone else?

8) In some ways, I am continuing on where Grafton (d. December 2017) left off. It is a one-of-a-kind story without equal in search of a Pulitzer Prize seeking writer.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow) 'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic  government and judicial malfeasance' = anarchy

 

September 08-2018 - SEE Sept. 24-2018 Update

 

TO: Hon. David Edy                                               FROM: Roger Callow

B.C. Attorney General                                           self represented litigant

Room 232 Parliament Buildings                         1285 Cahill Dr. #2001 E.

Victoria, BC  V8V 1X4                                            Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7                               

Phone: (250) 387-1866                                      
Fax: (250) 387-6411 2 pages sent by fax      employeescasecanada.ca

 

REFERENCE: S 188996 Vancouver Court Registry

 

To whom it may concern:

1) On Sept. 07-2018, I mailed a copy of a letter to the Defendant  B.C. Employer and Union in the above case with a copy to A.G. Edy. SEE website: SEPTEMBER-2018

2) On Sept. 07-2018, I received yet another unsigned letter from the Vancouver Courts requesting further adjustments to my forms in order for the court to proceed in filing. While complying with that apparently confusing request over a picayune point; nonetheless, I included a copy of my court response to A.G. Edy.

3) The above action makes no difference to the letter to the Defendants on Sept. 07 in which I plan to proceed to a written decision without their representation considering that they refuse to name their legal counsel (if any) of whom I have threatened with a separate third fraud charge if they appear. Disclosure  was also requested. The courts have refused disclosure for 33 years before over 50 judges amid much judicial malfeasance which the oversight bodies refused to acknowledge. That explains why the current charges in B.C. and Ontario (CV 18000 769 0000) are for civil fraud in the amount of $20 million each.

4) Regrettably, the politicized RCMP refuse to conduct a criminal investigation of this case, including under their current commissioner, Brenda Lucki. I am not alone in these accusations against the RCMP. For as long as I can remember, stolen cars are exported from the port of Montreal with impunity. When the RCMP, it appears, are asked to jump by certain authorities, they ask 'how high'. On the one hand, for example, they see fit to criminally investigate  the 'hissy fit' between two hockey players wives which has received widespread media coverage. On the other hand, the Employee's Case receives no media coverage due to a national  anti-employee media boycott.

5) While the timing of the commencement of the B.C. court appears delayed, that is not the case for the Ontario civil fraud case where, once again, the Employer is called on to supply the name of their legal representative (if any) plus volunteering to produce disclosure. The failure of A.G. Carolyn Mulroney to investigate this action before it proceeded against Hicks, Morley et al (Employer's ON legal representative) plus two judges named in a major act of malfeasance from 2014- (McKinnon j. and Scott j.) led to my request for Premier Ford to fire her. As he didn't comply, all legal matters are currently directed to him as the person of last resort. Premier Ford was kept apprised of this case in the 3 weeks before he took control of the government and appointed Carolyn Mulroney as A.G. at the end of June (about the time that I received my file number in this case.) The Union is not named in this suit.

6) I also take this time to insist that B.C. Attorney General, D. Edy, call in the RCMP to investigate criminality attached to  this matter. Failure to act places him in the same position as ON A.G. Mulroney which, as the point has been made in other accounts, will lead to the extinction of the NDP Party in B.C. as well as Federally.

7) The legal point made here is that the conduct of the Employee's Case in both provinces for fraud depends on disclosure before it can continue. Any judge ducking that call can be accused of the highest possible crime against a judge...the overt obstruction of justice, as this case is no longer one of mere judicial malfeasance although that in itself is a serious crime.

8) It is almost assured that revelation of disclosure will lead to criminal charges being laid against the Defendants (sweetheart deal) and elements within the B.C. government (imposed BILL 35 (1985) used only against this plaintiff and then withdrawn before the case was resolved (banana republic justice). As the Defendants are unlikely to put in an appearance in civil court under these fraud conditions, the court must apply the default $20 million to the plaintiff (if the court, indeed, has any credibility which as noted above is running at an all time low).

9) In brief, when the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear this unresolved matter in 2004 under the heading of ultimate remedy, the Canadian Justice System imploded with the corpse to follow. In 2018, that festering corpse is now following.

10) It is now up to A.G. Edy to act. (Side note: Where was the entire B.C. cabinet including the Green Party representative while National Green Party leader, Elizabeth May, was convicted for protesting at the Kinder Morgan site in Burnaby? They were conspicuous by their absence.)

11) A similar letter as the one written to the Defendants on Sept. 07 for the B.C. Court to proceed to a written decision with or without the presence of the Defendants will be prepared for the QC courts after the October 01 election with the renewal of earlier judicial complaints  ignored in that province (running a court within a court with subsequent cover up). That action has been approved for the court to proceed.

 

Yours truly (Roger Callow) Plaintiff  S18896 (B.C.) and CV 18000 769 0000 (ON)

 

cc  Premier Ford  / RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki

 

September 17-2018

 

'RESPONSE' to ON Supreme Court (Ottawa) File number CV 18000 769 0000

Roger Callow v West Vancouver School Trustees (S.D. #45) and two ON judges and an ON legal entity. (WRITTEN JUDGMENT ONLY - Please continue to adjudication as of this request)

 

BY: Roger Callow  Plaintiff  employeescasecanada.ca 2018   AUGUST & SEPTEMBER sub-headings

 

FURTHER INFORMATION FROM PLAINTIFF AVAILABLE IN WRITING IF REQUESTED BY THE COURT

MESSAGE:

1) This 'Response' has to be the most unusual legal action in Canadian jurisprudence. It is written by the Plaintiff rather than the Defendant.

2) There have been many court hearings in Canada (8 out of 10 provinces) before over 50 judges amid many accusations of judicial malfeasance by this plaintiff over the past 33 years in which the Employer always filed a Response but not now.

3) The difference lies in the fact that the courts always considered this unresolved  labour matter where no compensation has been paid as a private matter which they invariably ruled as a mere frivolous & vexatious action by this plaintiff. That position was reinforced by the many oversight bodies called by the plaintiff to investigate judicial malfeasance. No such body acknowledged these complaints which would have produced public recognition.

4) Now that the charge is civil fraud for $20 million, the Defendant has filed no response, most likely because no legal firm will represent them under pain of being sued separately for fraud.

5) ON Attorney General Carolyn Mulroney failed to examine this filed case (at the beginning of her mandate) at my request checking as to the validity of an action slipped in by the departing government. Nor did she seek to establish the groundwork necessary to pursue the fraud charge against the two Ottawa Judges (Mckinnon j. and Scott j.) dating back to 2014.

6) The judge handling this case is between a rock and a hard place.

a) As to the fraud charge against the two judges and ON legal representatives for the Employer, Hicks, Morley, et al which abandoned the Employer with my accusations set before the Ontario Legal Society; it is a matter - to use a colorful analogy - of not being any 'skin off my nose' although it may wind up as 'the removal of the hide' from the Canadian Justice System if the court sees fit to duck this one.

b) What is germaine to my issue is the fact that with no filed response, in law my assertions must stand as fact as to the existence of a conspiracy to deprive me of my teaching career.

c) While disclosure is central to this charge of fraud; indeed, the charge cannot proceed without it; nonetheless, the refusal of over 50 judges to provide that key evidence has been at the heart of judicial malfeasance associated with this case. It is submitted here that such publication of this disclosure would lead to criminal charges of fraud brought against the defendant Employer and Union.

d) Without a Defense, the presiding judge may only request - should he deem that disclosure is necessary - that the RCMP, which has been kept fully apprised of this issue for years; seize those documents.

e) If the above action (d) is not activated, the proper course for the judge is to provide this plaintiff with the $20 million default claim which cannot be arbitrated without the presence of the Defendants whom have already declined a presence in court.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow ) Plaintiff

 

cc Premier Ford / RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki

 

ADDENDUM: Norwich Order: a pre-action discovery which is a lot of legal gobbleygook as that is exactly what discovery is whether it pre-dates a case or arises within the conduct of a case...but then lawyers get paid by the number of words = verbosity where 'why use 10 words where 50 will do?'.

 

SEPTEMBER 19-2018

What Premier Doug Ford doesn't know about the Justice System which I have learned the hard way over the past 33 years

by: Roger Callow 'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Government and Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance in an unresolved legal issue.'   employeescasecanada.ca

 

1) Ford is in a position of being 'dead right' and in that order. The point is that if one is first dead, who cares whether or not he is right?

2) It does not appear that Ford is getting very good legal advice; the key one being that one may not be critical of a judge personally due to his decision; that is what appeal courts are for.

3) What a litigant can be critical of is the process by which the court conducted itself. That's why I am able to file a civil case for fraud in Ontario listing two judges with the West Vancouver School Trustees being the 'engine' of this charge for $20 million. No legal counsel will represent the WVST (as well as in B.C. in a second $20 million fraud charge) under pain of being sued separately for $20 million. In this unprecedented manoeuvre; two judges are named in the conduct of that fraud along with Ontario legal counsel for the Employer dating from 2014. SEE website for details.

4) What Ford needs and hasn't got is a casus belli to justify his action of reducing Toronto City Council from 48 to 24 seats.

5) In dealing with the Ford issue above, the presiding Justice is not limited to the 'notwithstanding clause' as many other factors can be cited in dealing with an issue. Indeed, I quoted the Charter on a number of occasions only to be ignored which is the prerogative of the presiding justice. In the unresolved  Employee's Case; the matter was reduced to this litigant merely being frivolous and vexatious on matters already decided. As to which matters were decided, the School Trustees are never specific and, here's the key point, the court does not ever demand that they be specific. That's been the story for 33 years.

6) A side note to the above is that I am dunned for all legal costs which I have never paid considering that I have never received an invoice. The Trustees refuse to say if they paid these bills and the North Shore News Tabloid refuses to challenge them on this level.

7) Other than a personal animus on the part of the Premier, the only thing to warm the cockles of his heart is the loud-mouth braying of the Conservative media bent on selling papers.

8) First past the post is a vital point in law as trying to come from behind leaves a litigant carrying baggage difficult to dispose. Ford already has one court loss. I had the loss of the arbitration dealing with my senior teacher lay-off in 1985 despite the succeeding court quashing the arbitration ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable for failing to show a causal factor (this perp; this crime). I have been left in limbo since that ruling with no judge willing to act to draw a conclusion. In essence, they pick up the ball and go home before the game is completed. That's how the Justice System imploded in 2004 under the 'ultimate remedy' conditions before the Supreme Court of Canada. 'You have exhausted all remedy under the law' volunteered my legal representative.

9)Today, I am 'walking back the cat' with the two fraud charges; a challenge unequalled in the annals of any legal system as I hit directly at 'the process'.

10) It would seem that Ford has not put out the money for qualified legal help and is about to pay the price a second time as judges do not take kindly to any one judge being personally 'dissed'.

11) For my part, it matters little to my welfare as to which way the winds blow for the Ford Government on this issue. The key advantage is that both of us, in our own ways, have revealed activist judges which have always permeated the system. As I put it; the Justice System imploded in 2004; corpse to follow. The now putrid corpse is currently following in B.C. and ON with the Employee's Case. I invite O.S. muck-raking columnist, Sue-Ann Nevins, to put that one in her pipe and smoke it in public.

 

SEPTEMBER 20-2018

TO KILL A MOCKING BIRDBRAIN or How to Put Lipstick on a Pig - A Spoof

by the 'Outlawed Canadian'

Scene: courtroom of Federal Court Justice, Hon. Edward Belobaba (good name for a rock band)

Clerk: Hear ye, hear ye, all rise...

Belobaba: Yah, yah, I heard you the first time...let's get this 'dog and pony' show on the road. Who's up to bat (son of a bitch; someone stole my brickbat. I bet it's one of those Provincial justice yahoos.)

Clerk: The Premier of Ontario, Doug Ford.

B. I thought that Elliott dame had that appointment in the bag with a little help from CTV.

Ford: Nope, I got it.

B. So you're Rob Ford, the ex-mayor?

F. No, he's dead; I'm his bro' , Doug and a former city councilor; now a budding Premier

B. Then let me get this straight. The paperwork here tells me...let's see; 47-25 = 22 councilors you would also like to see killed off.

F. 'Got it in one'. It's my constitutional right under the Charter of Rights Notwithstanding 'Claus'. You know, as in Santa Claus.

B. Oh, boy, I've got a live one here. Believe me, sir, I would like to help you out...which door did you come in? How can I explain this in very simple language. To put it simply, constitutional challenges must have the requisite forms filled out and appropriate Deputy Ministers notified. You have nothing. Even King Lear claimed that 'Nothing will come of nothing'. To be kind, perhaps you slept through that class and others for you seem to lack all class.

F. Don't get lippy with me. I have provincial judges which are paid far more than you on my side.

B. Oh, lordy...the meal ticket defense. Hey, we federal judges have got to eat too if only just barely.... However, I read you loud and clear. You have 3 Appeal Judges sitting in your back pocket. Won't have been the first time....

F. You must listen to everything I say and direct you to do....

B. I will stop you right there, mister; listening-yes, everything else no. I am running this court, not you...at least until your 3 'tried and true' Appeal judges come on the scene.... Now, as to your casus belli or, to dumb it down specifically for you, what is your beef?

F. I don't like the way Toronto City Hall is run....

B. You and about every man jack dealing with them. How are you different and how is killing off - let's see, 22 councilors - going to get the job done?

F. I don't have to tell you that; my lawyers say so.

B. ...and where did these lawyers get their law certificates...out of the proverbial cracker box?

F. There you go again, being supersilliness....

B. Mr. Ford, to be polite, I am inviting you as a 'budding Premier' (darn, where is my stash) to depart this courtroom. Go to your mother's basement - or wherever it is that you run this government of yours - and never darken these portals again. And on your way out, don't slam the door.

Scene ends with the sound of a slamming door

 

SEPTEMBER 24-2018

 

ON August  26-2018, I wrote:

TO  1) B.C. Teachers Federation                                FROM: Roger Callow aka 'Outlaw'

e-mail: presidentsoffice@bctf.ca                                           e-mail: thecallows@ g mail.com

1 page                                                                                      employeescasecanada.ca

2)  Board of School Trustees (WVST)                         

(S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.)                               

1075-21st Street, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 4A9                 

tel: 604-981-1000   fax: 604-981-1001    sent by fax

To whom it may concern:

1) Whom are your respective appointed legal counsels for Vancouver Supreme Court 

S 188996? You are going to put in an appearance, aren't you? = third fraud case

2) Are you going to provide me with disclosure in a timely manner (outlined in previous accounts) and avoid embarrassment  to the court? 

...etc.

On September 04-2018, I wrote:

1) I still have not heard from either Party as to Representation. If you wish me to alter the court  forms to read WVST Chairperson, Carolyn Broady and BCTF President, Glen Hansman, as Defendants,  you will have to notify me accordingly ASAP.

2) To date, there appears no notice to contest either of the two civil fraud cases in B.C. or ON. Nor is any inclination shown to provide the necessary disclosure on which the $20 million claim is to be based in both venues.

...etc.

September  07-2018

1) As I have not heard from either of the Defendants, I am submitting this case to be handled by the court in writing devoid of your arguments. Your final due date to communicate with me is September 14-2018 after which I will ask the court to render a written decision based solely on the information  provided by me to the court noting that should the court require further information, they may make a written request only to me or the RCMP for the purpose.

2) Considering the importance of this fraud case, special attention by A.G. D. Edy to the appointment of a highly proficient judge with an established reputation is required. (I have had enough of bozo decisions from the bench regarding the `personal matter` to which they would relegate this case.) The matter is now one of fraud. Should the court now demand disclosure, they will be limited to the services of the RCMP. The unchangeable default payment is for $20 million to be paid within 30 days. Without a challenge, by law my case must stand as fact in asserting that fraud is indeed the case.

3) Unless I hear from both Defendants by September 14, there will be no further communication with either defendant by me nor, for that matter by the court unless they obtain the necessary legal authority from A.G. Edy for the purpose. (The NDP future provincially and federally is at stake with this hearing.)

4) Of course it is understood that any 'unfinished' court result would include placing this plaintiff back on salary from 1985 with all conditions of the contract to apply.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow) Plaintiff  S 188996

 

cc  B.C. Attorney General D. Edy

 

SEPTEMBER 24-2018

1) Oh me, oh my, I thought with  $20 million dollar actions against the defendant B.C. Employer & Union; that they would leap at the bargain basement price of a $12 million buy-out; particularly as I include the Union to be covered as well as the Employer.

2) The Judges in both fraud cases in B.C. and ON are badly exposed without a defense from the two defendants. Will they mess up? Bet on it otherwise there would have been a buy-out offer.

3) How, then will the judges get away with legal 'murder'? Consider the Notwithstanding clause used by Premier Ford in Ontario. He bluffed his way into having 3 Appeal Court judges introduce a preposterous 'Stay of Proceedings' (similar to tabling a motion in order to dispense with it.)

4) One of the two judges named in the ON fraud charge, Scott j. pulled that stunt in 2014 so that the Appeal Court refused to hear the matter because I did not have a lower court Decision. Was one ever filed later? I don't know. Nor do I know exactly what was filed. Was it what a litigant receives as a Decision or what is filed as I submit such subterfuge was the case in the Nova Scotia Appeal of this case in 2017.

5) Hence this letter is written as a direct warning to the B.C. and ON Judges not to pull a fast one; i.e. accepting a last minute factum from the Defendants in B.C. without providing me with at least 5 days on receipt of such factums for a rebuttal opportunity. (In the case of ON, time has expired for the Defendant Employer to mount a defense hence the only recourse the ON court has should they demand disclosure (which is important in pursuing the charges against two judges (originally appointed as Federal Court judges = jurisdiction of Canadian Council of Judges) is to contact the RCMP which has a complete file on this case (Montreal Fraud Division) with Commissioner Brenda Lucki being kept in the loop. In this latter matter, A.G. Carolyn Mulroney has been shown to be 'less than competent' hence all correspondence goes to Premier Ford whom was kept in the loop as soon as he won the election in June-2018.

 

Yours truly,  Roger Callow

cc  ON Premier Ford / B.C. A.G. Edy / WVST / BCTF / RCMP Commissioner B. Lucki / President D. Trump (to warn international investors of the danger of dealing with 'sly' Canadian courts) c/o U.S. Embassy in Canada) / B.C. Supreme Court File No. S188996 / ON (Ottawa Supreme Court File No. CV18000 76950 0000)