JUMP TO HOME PAGE

APRIL - 2018

 

April 03-2018  Letter to Ottawa Sun columnist, Lorrie Goldstein p.21

'All Smoke & Mirrors'

 

MESSAGE:

1) When is the myopic media going to wake up and label 'not a clear mandate' to 'imposed' legislation by which the government may seize control of legislation?

2) Australia went through much the same struggle and gave the boot to the government pushing this illegal agenda.

3) The key is not so much the topic of 'climate' or 'pensions'; rather, it is control over the process. That is why the Carleton U CUPE Union is hanging tough on the pension question. Across the U.S. professional teachers are mired in the same struggle over pension control which, in effect, shifts the liability for losses onto the individual pensioner from the investor. The SEARS bankruptcy is a case in point.

4) B.C.'s BILL 35 (1985) since rescinded after it was used in the Employee's Case (banana republic law) is a case in point. The constitutional question rejected in 2017 for a hearing in Nova Scotia was limited to just this point of imposed legislation whether it be for an individual 'teacher lay-off' or for the imposition of a carbon tax. That was a catastrophic rejection and why I called on President Trump to invoke the Magnitsky Act against Justice Rosinski.

5) Once a government has control of the process; then they may apply virtually any conditions to the legislation. For example, The West Vancouver School Board Employer does not recognize court oversight of imposed legislation making a non-entity of over 50 judges plus the rest of the judiciary redundant in this case. No judge will address that point. That is how the Canadian Justice System collapsed amid an anti-individual national media boycott on the single most important issue in Canadian democracy.

 

The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice and Government System due to corrupt government and judicial malfeasance.

 

APRIL 15-2018

KINDER MORGAN B.C. PIPELINE

  

1) Construction of the Kinder Morgan (K.M.) Pipeline in B.C. is a clusterfuck with everyone battling to assert their opinion of this approved pipeline by the previous Christy Clark government. K.M. have already invested one out of the seven billion dollars on this pipeline and were successful in laying a private criminal charge (which the police and court enforced) against protesters including one group of Indigenous B.C. people plus Green Party National Leader, M.P. Elizabeth May. The B.C. courts have delivered the second shot (after the arrest and conviction) by backing the Kinder Morgan interests against the government.

2) There is little sympathy for 'razor-thin MP numbers' B.C. Premier Hogarth whom fears desertion by at least three MPP's to the Green Party and whom campaigned in the last election on stopping the KM pipeline. He is politically vulnerable should he not maintain his stand.

3) Alberta NDP's Premier Notley is also politically vulnerable by being chased at the heels by the Tories and is in danger of certainly losing the next election if she cannot get this pipeline built which the Federal government 'kind of' supports... considering the voting patterns.

4) P.M. Trudeau is looking to the next election and Liberal votes in B.C. with Alberta being a 'write-off' for the Liberal Party. He backed off with the East-West pipeline between AB and the Maritimes with the 'blackmail' of the Montreal mayor in Liberal rich Quebec voters. This East West line, it is submitted here, would be a major asset to the country; KM much less so. Trudeau is being chased by the media in support of KM.

5) I reject the KM line terminating in IOCO, up a fog shrouded inlet and a major shipping threat with which I am familiar. Re-locate the terminus to Robert's Bank Coal terminal in the Gulf of Georgia and I would support it.

6) All eyes are currently looking to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) under their newly appointed Chief Justice whom I had already condemned from his role in the Employee's Case: PLACARD: IMPEACH SC   ofC CHIEF JUSTICE RICHARD WAGNER

7) A second PLACARD; CUPE vs ONTARIO HYDRO / A JUDICIAL FARCE regarding alleged fraud over private interests buying half of ON Hydro was recently rejected for a hearing in Ontario after the usual 5 years of 'billable time' nonsense on the grounds that this matter was a 'political' and not a 'legal' one. In short, the court refused to look at the charges of fraud which pre-empt all other factors and would most certainly have cost the Wynne government the election in June (which she may very well lose in any event with Tory Doug Ford taking full aim at this back door deal). To be sure, Kinder Morgan is a political matter backed by enforcing the laws of contract = another ball of wax from which the SCofC cannot escape just as they did not escape the ramifications of the Employee's Case despite a media boycott of this national story. In short, their credibility is already shot along with that of the anti-employee media.

8) As to the particulars for the need of this KM pipeline? AB is able to ship her oil to B.C. terminals and is doing so...by railroad. In short, AB wants a cheaper route particularly in light of the U.S. heavily discounting AB oil moving south. It's an economic argument fraught with politics.

9) The interests rejecting the KM are as zealous in their endeavours (another 'Oka'?) as I am insisting on a judicial finding in my 'illicit' B.C. teacher lay-off in 1985 in an unresolved legal matter where no compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid due to the malfeasance of both judicial (over 50 judges including 4 trips to the SCofC) and government officials (specifically the B.C. Lieutenant Governor whom recently ducked out of her responsibilities on the Employee's Case = Premier Hogarth 'sucking and blowing at the same time' on legal 'niceties'): PLACARD: CANADA HAS MORALLY COLLAPSED / CORPSE TO FOLLOW. In short, Canada just plumb ran out of rope to hang themselves in both cases....it's a perfect storm....

 

ADDENDUM: The emergency meeting today held in Ottawa by P.M. Trudeau (sans the Indigenous people) had the expected outcome with B.C. Premier Horgan being the 'odd-man out'. Considering his support of the B.C. Lieutenant Governor in the Employee's Case, the de facto leader is now the sole Green Party MPP, Dr. Andrew Weaver. More on this account in the future.

 

APRIL 19-2018

 

POST IN STAFFROOM - e-mail colleagues (ON election-June 7)

 

SEE employeescasecanada.ca  2018  Constitutional Question (Ontario)

 

A) web site entitled PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS AGAINST IMPOSED LEGISLATION awaits a creator. Is that you?

B) May 31; last day for teacher dismissal notice. As a target planning a legal challenge; acquire your own lawyer ($10,000?) to parallel union lawyer.

 

AFFIDAVIT of FACTS (verbatim Form 4D)

I, Roger Callow of the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, swear and affirm the following is true:

1. I turned 65 on August 24, 2006, which brought into play my pension rights;

2. My pension rights are determined on the basis of contributions to the plan, both mine and the employers;

3. The amount of these contributions is dependent on the date of termination of my employment;

4. Because I was a tenured teacher, my employment could only be determined by a proper legal process;

5. In my case the validity of the termination has never been determined. Technically although I was unable to work and was not paid, I remained a teacher under the employment of the Board;

6.I require that a proper termination date be determined in order to provide me with appropriate compensation which would include pensionable service benefits; No compensation has been paid to date.

7. The recent pension inquiries caused me to examine how I could get compensation or a termination date determined. There is no other remedy I can pursue other than as requested in this petition as a first step towards any resolution. The Employer has successfully obfuscated the issue by declaring that the courts have no oversight over imposed legislation. The courts, to date, have ignored that central argument.

8. Whatever approach is made, disclosure as outlined above is at the root of any successful remedy although that is not asked for here in this petition.

9. This current action is limited to a determination of  the constitutionality of B.C.'s  imposed BILL 35 (School Amendment Act) as a first step in acquiring compensation in other courts, hopefully B.C. courts if an outside agreement cannot be reached.

10. In 2013, the B.C. Courts expelled this litigant 'for reasons best known to a judge' explaining why I turned to other venues. No court would adjudge the propriety of that B.C. Court action (Cullen Creed) although it is noted that a new filing in B.C. under the Horgan government  ignored that injunction.

 

______________________(signed) Roger Callow - Appellant  APRIL 16-2018

 

CHALLENGE  FORD, WYNNE, HORWATH on this legal matter at public forums!

 

APRIL 21-2018  A)

1) Dumb Doug (Ford); you missed on a knock-out blow. Remember the significance of Liberal John Turner vs Tory Brian Mulroney... `I had no choice` said Turner to Mulroney`s knock-out blow...`You had a choice, sir, and `you didn`t make one`. In your case, when a Liberal factotum called you à dick` (and quickly apologized); you pulled a Hilary Clinton by suggesting all Ontarians are `degenerates` as a consequence which I object to as the insult was specific to you...you dickhead. A better response would have been for you to say that if it takes a dick to condemn Liberal excesses (Hydro, etc.), then count me in and count Wynne out! Further, being labeled the Donald Trump of Canada is not helping your image. What is left is to publicize the Employee`s Case (by May 15, if you please), for there is no point in passing any legislation with Ontario courts badly lacking in credibility due to this legal case.

 

APRIL 21-2018  B)

 

IN A UNANIMOUS DECISION, PROVINCIAL TRADE BARRIERS UPHELD AS CONSTITUTIONAL

1) Whatever were those SCofC factotums thinking by creating more legal billable time nonsense with this Legal Decision??? ...oops, I think I just answered my own question. PLACARD: CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM / UNSAFE AT ANY SPEED

2) If the oversight committees had pursued my complaints of judicial malfeasance; two of those bozos would not be sitting on the bench due to cover-up:

Suzanne Coté and Richard Wagner, the current Chief Justice (QC appointments): PLACARD: IMPEACH SCofC CHIEF JUSTICE R. WAGNER

3) When former SCofC Chief Justice MacLachlin wrestled former P.M. Harper to the ground in foiling the 'Nadon' appointment to the SCofC; it was payback time and she had to smile sweetly when a non-entity was given the post by Harper. That's three justices which can be counted out and I am sure stories abound on the others: PLACARD: A PARADOX / CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM BROKE YET PLENTY FIXED AS IT IS!

4) All this and I still have not addressed the issue of inter-provincial beer sales which is par for the course as in 33 years with over 50 judges including 4 inconsequential trips to the SCofC, I still do not have a Legal Decision as to the payment of compensation (includes pension rights) in my job lay-off where no compensation has been paid.

5) A Constitutional Issue has been forwarded to Ontario Courts based on the fact that the employer, The West Vancouver School Trustees, refuse to recognize court oversight of imposed Legislation (BILL 35  1985). That question dealing with the relationship between the courts and government is the bedrock of Canadian democracy. Capable Foreign Affairs Minister, Chrystia Freeland need look no further than Canadian borders for the abuse of authoritarianism and democracy (which is not to detract from her naming Russia in that regard).

6) When this case is publicized, any Justice attached to this case will be treated with anathema by their credible colleagues in the profession. No doubt I am considered as 'the flypaper litigant'. Indeed, publicity could see no judge willing to 'fall on his sword' any longer for his legal fraternity.

ADDENDUM: Letter to the Editor O.S. April 25  BEER RULING IS A JOKE  'The Supreme Court decision on the applicability of Section 121 and the free movement of goods between provinces is nothing short of appalling...If Justin Trudeau's government doesn't have the guts to do so (invoke the 'notwithstanding clause'), one must ask: What constitutional right is next to fall? (the right of the courts to oversee imposed legislation. RC) Why have a constitution or Charter of Rights and Freedoms? What is the future of the rule of law? (Easy answer...there isn't any in Canada due to the Employee's Case. RC) It is sometimes said the law is an ass. In this case, so are the judges who came up with this ridiculous ruling. (Finally, somebody hitting at the nub of the problem. R.C.)  Mike Alain letter  Editor's comment: It's a bizarre ruling

APRIL 25-2018

TO: newsdesk@epochtimes.com 

FROM: Roger Callow aka 'The Outlawed Canadian'

QUOTES: 

A) ...Trump said to describe The Epoch Times as 'most credible newspaper'. It's the only (newpaper) he trusts U.S. Senate candidate Paul Taylor E.C. Apr.20-26 p.1

B) I concur as over a decade ago, the E.C. was the only media source ( absent Postmedia/CBC/CTV) willing to post my advertisement on a 'MUST READ ISSUE'. Apart from a novel, Bloody Harvest, Canadians at large have ignored the issue of illicit body part transplants in China. In 2006, at the height of this crisis, I believe I was the only Canadian to publicly protest this heinous practice: PLACARD: I SUPPORT FALUN GONG (My public protest on many government and judicial issues has run continuously from 2004.) PLACARDS: 1) IMPEACH SCofC CHIEF JUSTICE RICHARD WAGNER  2) THERE ARE NO OVERSIGHT BODIES

C) "Basically, sometimes unions do more harm than good," Hamilton MPP Paul Miller said."And sometimes they get their people into bad situations." NDP MPP BASHES UNION Ottawa Sun Apr. 19-2018 p.5  comment: I was the target of a 'sweetheart deal'. (The NDP is Union based)

D) 'It was an investigative standard. The best and fastest way to break a conspiracy was to identify the weakest link in the chain and find a way to exploit it. When one link was broken, the chain would come loose. The Black Box  Michael Connelly  comment: Due to the extensive coverage of this case across Canada (8 out of 10 provinces); a level of deceit in our Judiciary has been exposed (I did not create anything) hitherto unknown in this 'Harvey Weinstein moment'. To use a catch-phrase of President Trump: 'Canadians are sly'.

E) Armenian 'genocide' '...Accusing a nation (Turkey) and a people unjustly and unfairly for the most serious crime of humanity without a legal verdict is against Canadian principles of fairness and justice...must be established by competent courts not Legislature....' comment: Let's Canada out on both accounts.

F) 'It's the sacrifice of the future for the present, and lies by omission are far more pernicious and damaging than people think. It's like "Oh, I just won't pay attention to that." Anything that you don't pay attention to turns into a dragon.' controversial Canadian University Professor, Jordan Peterson

 

BACKGROUND:

A)                                               OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT TRUMP - MAR.01-2018

BY: Roger Callow The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial and government malfeasance  employeescasecanada.ca  (33 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 15 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid.

cc  President Trump c/o Kelly Knight Craft Ambassador to Canada f.613-688-3082 ...

 

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

WEST VANCOUVER SCHOOL TRUSTEE'S 'FINAL SOLUTION': 'If you do not accept what we offer in settlement,                                                                                                               you will get nothing at all.'

President Trump's authority to act: The Magnitsky Act

(moral and legal turpitude) As both Canada and the U.S. are signatories and as Canada has exempted itself from an internal application of this Act, it falls to such as the U.S. to apply this Act against Nova Scotia Justice P. Rosinski (Halifax 469918 Nov. 29-2017)and B.C. Lieutenant Governor Judith Guichon (2018)

Why President Trump should act: Due to a national anti-employee Canadian media boycott, it now appears necessary for an international force to act. In the case of the U.S., surely commercial interests should be warned about the deleterious actions of Canadian courts. (8 out of 10 provinces plus the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 inconsequential occasions and due to the incompetence of the Minister of Justice, P.M. Trudeau is negatively affected to a catastrophic degree). In brief, it's anarchy. Under those conditions, U.S. commercial interests may wish to re-evaluate their loan confidence for Canada from that of a developed country to that of a 'shithole' country. As President, you have an obligation to warn them accordingly. The question which needs be asked now is that if President Trump does not speak out, which international influence will take his place?

SEE employeescasecanada.ca  2018  Constitutional Question (Ontario) (SEE Affidavit below)

 

B) AFFIDAVIT

A1) web site entitled PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS AGAINST IMPOSED LEGISLATION awaits a creator. Is that you?

B1) May 31; last day for teacher dismissal notice. As a target planning a legal challenge; acquire your own lawyer ($10,000?) to parallel union lawyer.

 

AFFIDAVIT of FACTS (verbatim Form 4D)

I, Roger Callow of the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario, swear and affirm the following is true:

1. I turned 65 on August 24, 2006, which brought into play my pension rights;

2. My pension rights are determined on the basis of contributions to the plan, both mine and the employers;

3. The amount of these contributions is dependent on the date of termination of my employment;

4. Because I was a tenured teacher, my employment could only be determined by a proper legal process;

5. In my case the validity of the termination has never been determined. Technically although I was unable to work and was not paid, I remained a teacher under the employment of the Board;

6.I require that a proper termination date be determined in order to provide me with appropriate compensation which would include pensionable service benefits; No compensation has been paid to date.

7. The recent pension inquiries caused me to examine how I could get compensation or a termination date determined. There is no other remedy I can pursue other than as requested in this petition as a first step towards any resolution. The Employer has successfully obfuscated the issue by declaring that the courts have no oversight over imposed legislation. The courts, to date, have ignored that central argument.

8. Whatever approach is made, disclosure as outlined above is at the root of any successful remedy although that is not asked for here in this petition.

* 9. This current action is limited to a determination of  the constitutionality of B.C.'s  imposed BILL 35 (School Amendment Act) as a first step in acquiring compensation in other courts, hopefully B.C. courts if an outside agreement cannot be reached.

10. In 2013, the B.C. Courts expelled this litigant 'for reasons best known to a judge' explaining why I turned to other venues. No court would adjudge the propriety of that B.C. Court action (Cullen Creed) although it is noted that a new filing in B.C. under the Horgan government  ignored that injunction.

______________________(signed) Roger Callow - Appellant  APRIL 16-2018

CHALLENGE  FORD, WYNNE, HORWATH on this legal matter at public forums! (June 7 election)

 

C) ACTION CALLED FOR

     Will the Epoch Times publish an article exposing the national perfidy of Canadian government, law courts, and media on an issue which every Canadian should be cognizant as well as international investors?

'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Government and Judiciary due to systematic malfeasance in an unresolved labour issue where no compensation has been paid places Canada on a scale hitherto unknown in any democracy. Even Dante placed those whom should have acted but didn't, in the lowest rung of Hell. How about it, Epoch Times?

 

cc U.S. Embassy

 

APRIL 26

A copy of this letter appears on employeescasecanada.ca 2018 APRIL-2018 (APR. 26)

 

TOPIC: BAD REVIEW BATTLE COSTS THOUSANDS  (OTTAWA SUN APR.26 P.3)

1) A year ago, I would not have expected to see such an exposé of the scandalous conduct of the Better Business Bureau and the law courts over a 'legal billable time piece of legal nonsense' pillorying a former merchant member of the BBB. Both those organizations, no doubt, would wish that imposition were the current situation. The article merely exposes the tip of a legal iceberg in this 'Harvey Weinstein moment'

2) While the above article 'walks around the perfidy'; that is not the same case with a letter to the Editor the previous day lambasting the Supreme Court of Canada and its judges for an atrocious decision on inter-provincial trade (beer war). I address that letter on my website. More pointed remarks of this kind are warranted by the media.

3) In the 1990's, I had a franchise installing home alarms in which the Head Office in Toronto held BBB membership. The agreement with the client was for 4 years with opportunities to transfer this wireless system. One new owner of a house consented to pay the last 2 years but had second thoughts and asked me to remove it. I made cosmetic (unnecessary) changes to the location of the devices but maintained that the contract be honoured (as supported by Head Office). Then the usual blackmail was invoked by the client..."If you do not remove it, I will complain to the BBB"... which he did and which the BBB supported the Company. However, here's the point that I wish to make here. The BBB does not comment on findings, only that there was one complaint which was given prompt action by the Company. That goes on the record for anyone researching a Company's reputation Under these circumstances, the Merchant in the above story did not respond to the complaint hence the reading should be 'one complaint not responded to'

4) The Merchant dropped BBB membership and possibly was part of a growing trend with small merchants as a threat to the very existence of the BBB. The judges could not be but painfully aware of that dilemma for the BBB. The BBB - it appears - in retaliation began grading Companies and assigned a 'D' to this Merchant thus striking a major blow to his business prompting the lawsuit. The Courts 'toyed' with the case for 8 years by, for example, approving legal fees three times higher than expected against the merchant thus forcing yet more court time and costs ultimately borne by this Merchant.

5) The effect of this article is to spell the death knell for the BBB and draw into disrepute the process of law. Keep up the good work, Postmedia's Kelly Egan, in exposing this type of judicial perfidy.

 

'Outlaw'

 

APRIL 27

'INDEPENDENT WITNESSES'

1) As any trial layer can tell you, there is no such thing as an independent witness as all witnesses in major cases are coached by the lawyers to 'sing out of the same song book to the same tune'.

2) I had that truism brought home to me when I saw West Vancouver School Board Counsel coaching the School Principal so that when he closed down his case, I was royally stitched up. That is, until it was pointed out to him that letters I provided to the Board (much like a modern e-mail) detailed every incident (based on the dismissal of a senior teacher in 1978 -SEE web ORIGINS) with much the same cast of bad authority actors (and lawyer). Stuart Clyne, the School Board lawyer asked permission to re-open the case and for the next 5 days the case unraveled before our eyes including testimony that the Assistant Superintendent responsible for staffing claimed no need for any teacher lay-off in June of 1985 nor did the School Trustees recommend any such lay-off which, he claimed, came solely from the Superintendent, Ed Carlin (dismissed one year later).

3) So why did the Arbitrator decide to continue with the conspiracy? Clyne did not put the School Trustees on the stand to testify (perjure themselves) as to lay-off numbers; the arbitrator did not ask for them to take the stand, hence all eyes were on the Union lawyer who refused my insistent request that he place the trustees on the stand = sweetheart deal. The arbitrator, believing he had no concerns about an Appeal under these circumstances ruled in favour of the School Board.

4) I changed lawyers and a court Appeal quashed the arbitration leaving me, as it turns out, in a 33 year state of limbo. My written record had made all the difference.

5) CBC's Jan Ghomeshi won his criminal trial on sexual assault primarily because of his e-mail records. Bottom line? In the spirit of the law punishing only those which it apprehends; the courts convict only those without a paper trail...go figure....

 

APRIL 28

TEACHER POPULARITY

1) Pacifist groups in society depend on a larger entity to protect them militarily. Similarly, popular teachers depend on a conservative administration to play the 'bad cop' to their 'good cop'. As to what makes a teacher popular?...an unpopular teacher who invariably says 'no' while the popular teacher says 'yes'. The scenario is played out also with parents where invariably the 'bad guy' mother covers for the irresponsibility of a 'bad guy' father. Luckily, both my wife and I with teaching background shared the same core values in raising our children.

2) I don't envy popular teachers as they are oftentimes 'put on' for favours from students, administrators, colleagues and parents. (I always did my share with extra-curricular activities - athletic team sponsorships; debating. As one senior teacher advised me...always be seen to be doing something for the students.) I have met more than one popular teacher in retirement whom, it turns out, was not happy in the job. Mind you, one international sales trainer once told me that 95% of people do not like their jobs. Not me, I replied, as I do not ask to 'like' my job; my reward is doing a job well much like the actor on the stage of which I had some amateur experience. Some say that the U.S. went wrong as a society when they substituted 'the pursuit of happiness' for 'respect for private property'; a major shift from an external goal to an internal one possibly behind much of today's narcissism.

3) Teacher popularity is strong among teen-agers; particularly teen-age girls whom 'just love Mr. T.' and providing it does not go too far; a harmless crush. (Every decade in large high schools; it does go too far, and a male teacher is seen to divorce his wife to marry a pregnant student all of which is 'hushed up' although the Teachers College created in 1990 in Ontario did much to chase the pedophiles out. The Harvey Weinstein Movement may accelerate that trend.)

4) Politically, much is made of Justin Trudeau's teacher connections. In his favour, he is fantastically physically fit, a good family man, but vapid when it comes to the more serious aspects of running a government. Mind you, he is not alone in that respect as the only politician I would vote for to be P.M. is Chrystia Freeland. (I do not vote any longer as the system seems at most to replace one set of bureaucrats with another all bent on acquiring big salaries and golden pension parachutes. It wouldn't be so bad if they 'delivered' but they don't as I have been able to expose with Canada's Judicial System.)

5) My central political point to be made here is that 'popular' Justin may prove more deleterious to the welfare of Canada than his 'unpopular' counterpart  in the U.S., President Trump. For example, Trudeau has been a financial profligate in promoting his own welfare abroad at considerable expense to the Canadian economy. The war in Mali is one such assignment in which Trudeau appears to be sucker punched by those whom have little respect for him. Currently, Montreal and Toronto are bursting with illegal immigrants for which the Federal government has not been taking financial responsibility after Trudeau prompted the exodus to our shores.