MARCH 2017

 

LETTER TO N.S. & P.E.I. TEACHERS - MARCH 2017

 

QUOTE: '...And with that shovel, he dug for the truth. You know the truth isn't hard to find, if you're willing to get your hands dirty. Truth waits just under the surface for any man or woman brave enough to scrape a little dirt away. But most people are too afraid or too lazy to get dirty. They're afraid to ask the right questions. The hard questions....'

 

REFERENCE: This unresolved legal matter regarding the 'illicit' lay-off of former West Vancouver, B.C. high school teacher, Roger Callow, under the auspices of the imposed BILL 35 in June of 1985 is fraught with fraudulent actions by both the conspirators and the courts (over 12 separate court systems with over 50 judges including 4 inconsequential trips to the Supreme Court of Canada-SCofC). No compensation has been paid which belongs to this plaintiff whether it be under BILL 35 (which only the Employer recognizes as having legal weight), the collective bargaining agreement (which only the B.C. courts will recognize) or general terms of contract.

 

MESSAGE: employescasecanada.ca - SEE PE.I. resubmission February 28-2017

1) In both provinces, a constitutional question is at the heart of actions in Nova Scotia (employer defendant) and Prince Edward Island (union defendant) regarding imposed legislation as it relates to the oversight powers of the court.

 

2) This question is of interest to both employers and employees yet it would be scuttled by the employer if they get their way in N.S. That's why I have called on Professional teachers to MAKE NOISE  i.e. inform all teachers in their province of this issue. So far teachers, no doubt buoyed  up by salary settlements have let down their guard in these two provinces.

 

3) So readers of this letter should take concrete action otherwise the following can be expected:

a) As matters now stand based on the precedent of the Employees Case, employers may invoke the West Vancouver School Trustee's 'final solution' to laid-off employees; either accept the compensation we offer or get nothing at all.

b) All lay-offs have a degree of collusion between the Union leader and the School Board as they do not want unwanted expensive litigation which does not necessarily bode well for the needs of an individual faced with lay-off. Based on the above case, the justice system will sanction these 'sweetheart deals' no matter how fraudulently the two entities act.

c) Under these circumstances, it is imperative that teachers MAKE NOISE as that is what the employers are closely watching... no noise, no justice.

d) While few teachers expect to be laid-off, think of that colleague who is being dismissed. Surely an 'I'm all right, Jack' is poor balm to such a victim. Also, if you don't fight now, expect seniority provisions to become a matter of the past leaving senior teachers particularly vulnerable to lay-off due to their higher salary. Hence they cannot expect to work again in their chosen profession.

 

4) So don't just read this letter and set it aside. Contact others.

 

 

DON'T LET THIS BE YOU!

 

March 05-2017

 

Nova Scotia Barristers Society

Cogswell Tower

800-2000 Barrington Street

Halifax NS B3J 3K1

T: 902-422-1491 

F: 902-429-4869  1  page sent by fax 

 

REFERENCE: A) multi-page rebuttal to the West Vancouver, B.C. School Trustee Employer's Defendant Response dated February 08-2017. Under employescasecanada.ca REPLY TO NOVA SCOTIA 458698 is my REPLY (EXHIBIT A & B)  dated February 13-2017. 

B) February 21-2017 letter to the NS Judicial Review Body under the Chief Justice

N.B. Copies of these letters have been sent to Premier McNeil/ P.M. Trudeau/ RCMP as well as keeping the NS Teachers at large notified. (cc March 05-2017 letter to above parties)

 

MESSAGE:

1) I have not received any acknowledgment let alone analysis of allegedly fraudulent material contained in the Defendant Employer's factum in NS 458698 from the NS Barrister's Society.

2) That pattern is consistent across Canada in other provinces where this 32 year unresolved labour issue with its genesis in B.C. in which no compensation has been paid to senior teacher, Roger Callow, whom was illicitly laid off in June of 1985 under the imposed BILL 35.

3) If such as the Canadian Council of Judges under the aegis of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC), Beverley McLachlin, and now Prime Minister Trudeau, had not ignored earlier complaints about such fraudulent activities of the court as well as the Defendant Employer, I would not be in Nova Scotia raising this 'case-neutral' constitutional question of the relationship between imposed legislation and court oversight.

4) Until the above complaint is properly examined, we cannot proceed with the two hearings unilaterally arranged by the Employer in February & March (1/2 hour Chamber meetings) in which they try to have the entire case dropped leaving Canadians bereft of a constitutional question which is of national importance to both Employers and Employees.

5) The proper course, I submitted in my reply, was for the NS Barrister's Society to examine alleged fraudulent materials provided to them by me with an aim to bar B.C.'s Harris & Co. from Nova Scotia and proceed with the constitutional question. The Employer did not address the question of the constitutional question in their voluminous 'Book of Authorities'.

6) The Employer's argument is that, under imposed legislation, they do not have to recognize court oversight such as, in this case, the B.C. Court quashing an arbitration ruling, as it did, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable.

7) My point is that even under the specious imposed BILL 35, compensation must be paid to laid-off teachers and yet over 50 judges (including 4 'unheard' trips to our SCofC) gave no answer to that question ...just silence which appears to be the reaction of the NS judiciary.

 

Yours truly, (Roger Callow) The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System

 

 

 

   OPEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO POTUS Mr. TRUMP

(Until a successive 21st Century Prime Minister to Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MAR.05 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 12 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now directed to POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M.(Trudeau)  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century. Currently, Nova Scotia teachers in N.S. Claim 458698 against the Employer are the focus of attention with this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister). Prince Edward Island has a similar action against the Union. Today's theme is how the Employee' Case is not unique to the legal fraternity merely being the worst case example of exposed judicial chicanery in Canada. This theme runs throughout other Canadian bureaucracies which are also broken and cry out for a leadership that they are not getting.

 

 

THE BUREAUCRACY AS AN INHERENT LIE

PLACARDS:

A) STAY OUT OF A CANADIAN COURTROOM UNLESS YOU FIRST BUY THE JUDGE

B) A PARADOX:  THE LAW IS BROKE YET PLENTY FIXED AS IT IS

C) WHY OBEY THE LAW? JUDGES DON'T

D) FATHER PIERRE: 'JUST WATCH ME'/  SON JUSTIN: 'JUST PHOTOGRAPH ME'

     (Reference: 1970's War Measures Act in QC during FLQ Crisis)

E) BEHIND EVERY ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IS A MORAL COLLAPSE

 

MESSAGE:

1) Where should I begin? Perhaps with the best known bureaucratic lie in history... the Warren Commission on the President Kennedy assassination in November 1963; the same day that mafia chieftain, Carlos Marcello, was to be deported by the President's brother, Robert Kennedy. The deportation was called off with the assassination in the morning of that day. Lee Harvey Oswald, the reputed assassin did get his 3 shots away, one hitting Kennedy in the back but it was a second shot from a neighboring building which was the kill shot hitting Kennedy in the brain. At that point Oswald realized he had been set up. The Warren Commission stuck stubbornly to its 'single bullet theory' never mentioning the role of Marcello in the assassination who went on, it is reputed, to kill Robert Kennedy in 1968 in his run for the presidency. Marcello died of old age in the 1990's. in the U.S. Jack Ruby, tied up in the Cuba casino interests of organized crime, murdered Oswald after a door was unlocked to let him through Dallas police station for the purpose. He later died in jail. The key to the assassination is how the autopsy in Dallas differed significantly from the later one in Washington where JFK's brain had been removed ...on Air Force One on the trip back with wife Jackie.

2) V.P. LB Johnston took over, (he had asked at the assassination...was anyone shooting at me?) dismissed Robert Kennedy, and pursued the Viet Nam war which wore him down particularly with the chants at public meetings... 'hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?' If it had not been for Viet Nam and later Iraq under President G. Bush, Cuba was to be the invasion target to recoup gambling investments made before Castro took over... and Marcello was a main player in that gambit.

3) The above story is mainly one of omission i.e. no mention is made of the second bullet in the Warren Commission; however, it is when the authorities act on commission that an enormous problem is created such as was the case in the Employee's Case Canada where the government (imposed BILL 35) conspired with the Employer (West Vancouver, B.C. School Trustees) and elements in the local West Vancouver Teachers Association (sweetheart deal). That story lies in the disclosure (habeas corpus) of the June 1985 School Trustee meetings where BILL 35 and the Callow matter were  discussed extensively.

4) Justice Mary Southin called for all meeting notes - from Union and School Trustees - regarding the illicit lay-off of this senior teacher and then did a most unusual thing;  she returned those documents 'because she did not use them'. This action permitted the litigants Employer & Union (apart from myself), to blackmail the courts into maintaining their silence on releasing this  disclosure. Therein lies the biggest judicial scandal in the history, I dare say, of any democratic nation claiming, as it does, court credibility which is the mainstay of any Justice System. The real crime? The hundreds of judicial factotums whom are maintaining a lie that they have never understood or analyzed nor do they intend to do so as the 'Nuremberg' answer of Nazi Germany is to hold here ...'We are only following Orders'.  That position applies here as well to all the politicians and the anti-employee media in a country where the rights, indeed the very existence of the 'individual', have been extinguished. That's how I became the Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to judicial malfeasance.

5) So, Mr. Trump, feel free to tweet in the middle of the night to Canadians ignorant of the biggest challenge to Canadian nationhood as supported by our indolent Prime Minister.

 

Auxiliary Message:

6) Recently, Mr. Trump, a U.S. Company won a multi-million settlement in International Court (collection to be made separately) against the Ontario government for reneging on Green Power windmill installations. You can imagine how successful they would have been suing directly in an ON court. In the Pacific, one pending trade deal resorted to a separate tribunal for disputes no doubt because they cannot trust to Canadian courts.

7) The above explains why I have advocated that the U.S. government hold all commercial disagreements with Canada in the U.S. with the U.S. government guaranteeing payment in the event of a U.S. success to be held against the Canadian government for payment.

8) Recently, a popular Canadian Vice Admiral was released from duties without explanation although rumour would suggest a 6 year leakage regarding ship contracts is at the root of the problem(leakage on this level of government contracts is systematic).

9) I can identify with the personal plight of that Vice Admiral, nonetheless, that is the way to go - suspend the CEO until a finding is made. For example, QC Premier Chouinard is faced with another scandal (on top of the Employee's Case judicial debacle) with accusations of wide-spread corruption in the Montreal police force. Proper action, I submit, would have been to suspend the Police Chief until a finding is given as mere investigations, particularly in QC, are meaningless public relations exercises. Similarly, P.M. Trudeau should suspend retiring Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Beverley McLachlin, along with her pension, until the matter of the Employee's Case and her direct role in that disaster is examined. Then Trudeau should step down as two more provinces - Nova Scotia and P.E.Island - are 'up to bat' after the demise of Premier Chouinard's Quebec and Wall's Saskatchewan. Nepotism under John and Robert Kennedy has nothing on PEI's Premier Wade Maclauchlan who has retained the Ministry of Justice portfolio. He has already absconded with one of my fee cheques.

10) As to hypocrisy in the spirit of 'crooked Hillary', keep an eye on the Trudeau Foundation which may eclipse her starting with the Hong Kong billionaire who 'bought' himself into the Canadian banking system which is soon to be upended with the Liberal government's version of banking based on pension funds hi-jacked for the purpose. Hoffa and his Union gang did much the same thing with union client funds in the past in the U.S.

 

JUDGING Broken in Ontario - A spoof?

Let's fix it (article from O.Sun)  Carleton University Criminology Instructor

'...Granted there are good judges out there every day doing stellar work...but that's not the issue. The fact of that one act of discreditable conduct by a judge undermines all the fine work that judges do each and every day of the year...The reality is that judging is broken in this province and it's going to take more than lip service from the provincial government to fix the problem...and dramatically increases the penalties for judges who break the law, nothing will change ...What the province needs is not the dysfunctional oversight bodies in place now ...intestinal fortitude that is lacking among many of our politicians today at both the federal and provincial level ...general dissatisfaction and lack of trust that people have for judges. This is not an overnight phenomenon. ...Until we change the kind of people we are recruiting into the judging service and develop accountability measures to get rid of judges who flagrantly break the law, we are going to end up not just with one rotten apple to deal with but an entire barrel of rotten apples....

AND THE SPOOF? Substitute 'police' for 'judge' and you have what was actually said in this article... Nothing to laugh at, is it?

 

March 10-2017

TO:                                                                                         FROM:

Rt. Hon.  J. Trudeau P.M.                                                 Roger Callow - plaintiff                                        

                                                                                                'employescasecanada.ca'                                                          

REFERENCE: PE Island Registry Prothonotary Terry MacPherson

ACTION CALLED FOR: To take the necessary steps to see to MacPherson's suspension

QUOTE:

'...I have always had the suspicion that officers assigned to front desk duty were chosen by cunning supervisors because of their skills in obfuscation...If you doubt this, walk into any police station in the city and tell the desk officer who greets you that you wish to make a complaint against a police officer. See how long it takes him to find the proper form. Desk cops are usually young and dumb and unintentionally ignorant....' The Fifth Witness Michael Connelly

MESSAGE:

1) As P.M., I am sure that you know the all-important judicial measure for a litigant is to have unfettered access to the court without which no justice system makes sense.

2) In this controversial 32 year unresolved labour matter where no compensation has been paid to this laid-off teacher under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35, some courts make improper use of the Registry to obfuscate assigning a docket number which is the case above.

3) Prothonotary MacPherson from PEI is one such individual . I believe I have answered her specific concerns on re-submissions, yet I still do not have a docket number.

4) The docket number is all important for she can make the same rejection based from within the court proper which can be appealed; not so if the same objections are made as a Registry clerk.

5) No doubt she is acting according to advice (Premier MacLauchlan, surprisingly, has retained the Justice Ministry portfolio and has been kept apprised as Premier of these ongoing obstructions). However, it is her name on the form hence I ask for her suspension. In the interim , Premier and Justice Minister MacLauchlan is requested to assign a docket number.

Yours truly,

Roger Callow  plaintiff

cc Terry MacPherson  PEI prothonotary / Premier W. MacLauchlan

 

 

   OPEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO POTUS Mr. TRUMP

(Until a successive 21st Century Prime Minister to Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MAR.12 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 12 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now directed to POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M.(Trudeau)  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century. Currently, Nova Scotia teachers in N.S. Claim 458698 against the Employer are the focus of attention with this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister). Prince Edward Island has a similar action against the Union which is currently being frustrated by the court in assigning a docket number. Today's theme is 'Honesty as the best policy'.

 

 

 

 

HONESTY AS THE BEST POLICY

QUOTES:

A) 'There are different kinds of truths for different kinds of people. There are truths appropriate for children; truths that are appropriate for students; truths that are appropriate for educated adults; and truths that are appropriate for highly educated adults, and the notion that there should be one set of truths available to everyone is a modern democratic fallacy. It doesn't work.'  Irving Kristol

B) '...It would be a perfect storm: the public wanting a villain: the mainstream media wanting a fall guy to protect the powerful; the potentially culpable firmament doing everything in its collective power to deliver the villain  the public was clamouring for. It would be a kind of mass cleansing, cathartic for everyone involved, a ritual stoning of a symbolic individual to bury the broader sin.'  Inside Out  Barry Eisler

C) 'Yeah, the hard part was creating the receptivity, getting the public to want to believe something without them actually realizing they wanted to believe it. After that, it was easy to just realize it for them. Ibid

D) 'Conspiracy? How can there be a conspiracy when everyone is complicit? Ibid

E) 'Politicians choose the voters and not the other way around' ...it's an oligarchy type of thing.

F) PLACARD: CANADA LED BY OVERLY-AMBITIOUS CLICHÉ RIDDEN JERKS

 

MESSAGE:

1) President Trump would be wise to review the above quotes as the media has created through public demonstrations that 'perfect storm' anticipating his assassination which has those self-same assassins warming up in the bullpen with his undocumented accusation that former President President Obama was behind wiretapping him.

2) As to spying, everyone does it but like those 'ladies of the night'; they want to be married in white. It is a basic contradiction. When the U.S. gives the boot to a number of Russian spies; the Russians retaliate by giving the boot to an equal number of U.S. spies and vice versa...it is the way the game is played. Due to technology, spies can now listen into your messages through your TV and smartphone...'1984' has arrived. Bureaucrats lack the necessary imagination to comprehend the ramifications of the change i.e. Future Shock by Alvin Toffler. It is like driving an automobile according to the principles of guiding a horse and buggy which they insist on doing. Why else call the first automobiles 'horseless carriages'? ...Are we 'dogless people'? Are dogs 'catless dogs'(they would certainly agree). Look at the problem Darwin had, in effect, calling humans 'a monkey's uncle'? Bureaucrats back into the future; it is their way.

3) Currently the teachers in Nova Scotia and PE Island are permitting the legal bureaucrats to back into their legal black hole similar to one the B.C. teachers occupy; a big mistake as they should be MAKING NOISE. But how do you strengthen a backbone where there isn't one to begin with? That point was reflected in one student's written observation to me on my teaching in 1985 with this statement: 'Mr. Callow was always willing to help those who were willing to help themselves.'  Realistically, that statement applies to 20% of the population; the other 80% would be better off just doing what they are told to do. Don't believe me?...look at the figures for personal indebtedness. Further, why do 95% of people hate their jobs, according to one highly successful promoter? (I don't, I told her, but then I never set out to 'like' the job; just 'do it' which was my businessman father's advice as a boss to me; 'If you see a task which needs doing, do it.' That's small business talk and does not apply to the big bureaucracies.) That is why democracies are basically unworkable which even Winston Churchill would be in agreement although he points out it is the best alternative to heinous dictatorship. Hence, the current crop of 14 Canadian Tory party leadership contenders are forever doomed to wandering around in a miasma of duplicity similar to ships sailing the ocean blue never to put into port. In the Employee's Case, I have likened that kafkaesque state as 'sailing on a sea of red tape never to put into the port of judgment'. It is a time honoured practice of the judiciary which has been exposed in Canada for a first time in any western democracy. Bottom line? We are like the Roman Empire immediately before the generals took over or, in our case, before we become an American state. It almost happened in WWII as the U.S. was going to march into the '14th Colony' if the British had collaborated with the Nazis which the British Parliament was planning to do if it had not been for Churchill's 'blood, sweat and tears' appeal. That one man changed Canada's future. Will it happen again?

4) A side note on the Ottawa Citizen breaking the media boycott to publish the bombastic statement of ON Justice Colin McKinnon on April 29-2014 on page 1: 'Callow is treating the Justice System as some sort of smorgasbord...this must be stopped. Now.' A puzzling article as there was no perspective other than to imply I was a 'troublemaker'. So why was it done and why did the O.C. refuse my 'Right of Reply'? The answer? The internet. Look under Employee's Case Canada.com and you will find a discontinued web site by me with only McKinnon's judgment. The last thing the anti-employee media wanted was my 'Right of Reply' published on the internet. The current website has only one 'e' (Employes) beginning in 2016 and does not refer to the McKinnon Decision. It was McKinnon's action in writing a second Decision on September 15-2014 without my knowledge and certainly against any interpretation of ethics which found its way into a second  court of Scott j. (originally Federally appointed judges = Canadian Council of Judges oversight) which is the basis of the fraud perpetuated through QC and SK courts up to the level of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) in 2016. Failure to hear about that fraud has lead directly to calling on the executive powers of the P.M.O. by me which, under Trudeau, is MIA. Currently, the Employer is seeking to pervert the course of justice in N.S. by having that province condone the McKinnon-Scott fraud in their factum with the full knowledge of Trudeau (SEE web site for more detail on this fraud background). In short, unless the NS Teachers MAKE NOISE, it is likely that NS will lose its government and court credibility ...and that would never do....but we are on the road to that outcome.

5) And how will the 'dirty deed 'be done on Mr. Trump? Some might think that President Trump should borrow President Putin's food tasters although my bets are on a drone attack while playing golf which makes for more intrigue... What was the real reason for the visit to Canada in November 2016  by Democratic V.P.'s Joe Biden?

6) The Canadian courts and their bum chums, the Defendant Employer, appear to be taking their modus operandi from the American CIA vis a vis the Caspars; those unlisted inmates - some of them knowingly innocent - at Guantanamo used to bulk the numbers in the first part of the century to convince the U.S. public that the government was serious about combating terrorism after 9/11. These ghosted inmates without paper work just disappeared. Similarly, anyone reading the Defendant's factums and the Court Orders would never know that I had provided rebuttal information. It is that error of omission which has collapsed any credibility which both the CIA and the Canadian courts may have.

 

ATTN: NOVA SCOTIA TEACHERS

March 17-2017

 

TO: Nova Scotia Judicial Council                        FROM: Roger Callow #458698 Superior Court

ATTN: Chief Justice (chair)                                                  1285 Cahill Dr. E. #2001

The Law Courts                                                                      Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

1815 Upper Water St.                                                         tel: 613-521-1739

Halifax, NS  B3J 1S7                                                             

 

sent by fax: 902-424-0524   cc Premier McNeil /PMO /RCMP

 

QUOTE: 'The moves made outside the courtroom were always more significant than those made inside. The inside moves were all prepped and choreographed. The Fifth Witness  Michael Connelly

 

MESSAGE:

1) As the victim in a judicial conspiracy for 32 years in the matter of a B.C. senior West Vancouver teacher laid-off in 1985, I have been left 'sailing on a sea of red tape never to put into the port of judgment'.

2) With the specious judgment of the arbitrator squashed by the court, the Employer still has refused to pay compensation which belongs to this victim under the conditions of B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 as well as other court considerations e.g. collective bargaining.

3) Without excusing the Employer, the fault lies entirely with over 50 judges in various courts across the land including the Supreme Court of Canada leaving this matter entirely in the hands of a 21st century Prime Minister.  P.M. Justin Trudeau with his executive powers is MIA on this folder leading to a national crisis without equal.

4) The key to this court failure lies with B.C. Supreme Court's Mary Southin (r. 2004) whom quashed the arbitration in 1986 ruling as she did, the government-appointed arbitrator to be patently unreasonable. She stated that there was no causal factor. Further, he had converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with myself as the necessary 17th knowing full well that I was the only lay-off that year in June of 1985. I was left in limbo.

5) The story behind this conspiracy in which the government was hi-jacked (imposed BILL 35) and the Justice System co-opted (gerrymandered arbitrator appointment) to sanction a sweetheart deal is fairly well known but lacks the necessary disclosure of the June meeting notes of the WV School Board which discussed BILL 35 and senior teacher, Roger Callow, at length as a consequence of my whistle blowing (providing the Education Ministry in Victoria of material relating to an administrator's fraud. He had changed my professional teachers Report from a positive to a negative and I caught him in that process).

6) Justice Southin called for all these meeting notes and then made a cardinal mistake by which the Employer and Union were able to blackmail her; namely, returning the documents 'because she did not use them' raising the question as to why she felt that she had to return that highly toxic material. Obviously she was privy to the extent of the conspiracy and chose to do nothing.

7) From there a judicial cover-up was initiated to, it is asserted here, protect Southin  (r. 2004) from her egregious error which entailed corrupting the entire judiciary clear across Canada in the following 30 years.

8) That explains why no issue is ever discussed as the courts of law diminish this case by opting out for judicial reasons (res judicata / frivolous & vexatious behaviour / lack of jurisdiction) as a means of protecting the courts which, like MacBeth, find it 'easier to go over' than to ever go back and sort out this colossal mess now known as the 'cluster-fuck' case.

9) The above explains why the NS Judiciary in terms of the Barrister's Society are pulling out the stops to have this case to be dropped from the docket. The case focuses solely on a constitutional question (the relationship of the oversight powers of the courts to imposed legislation) and was originally intended to be 'case neutral' requiring no attendance of the Employer. With their intervention, I now call for disclosure.

10) Two 1/2 hour Chambers meetings are scheduled by the Employer for which, if the past is to repeat itself and there is no reason why it should not although NS will join the provinces of SK and QC as having courts of law without credibility, the PMO will be left with this judicial mess to resolve through its executive powers of the Prime Minister.

11) When I set court dates, I always confer with the defendant as to availability as insisted by the courts. B.C.'s Harris & Co. on two occasions in NS has set dates without my knowledge; the second set of two separate hearings now being pre-empted by my request for a voir dire hearing to deal with allegedly fraudulent material in the Defendant's copious Book of Authorities. That request was made when the NS Barrister's Society ducked out of my request on that level. It is clear from both occasions that the Defendant is seeking to have the court throw out this 'case neutral' constitutional question which they had raised earlier in ON 13-59060 McKinnon j. in which the judge, one and at the same time, ignored their request and found me as the defendant to be frivolous & vexatious . McKinnon j. confounded his own villainy by publishing a second Order on September 15-2014 which made no reference to the first Order dated April 23-2015. I call that fraud which found its way through the courts of QC and SK plus the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) in 2016: 36883 QC and 36993 SK. No SCofC hearings were held leaving this matter of egregious fraud to be directed to the PMO where it resides today. (The Canadian Council of Judges under President SCofC B. McLachlin never acknowledged the complaint against McKinnon j., initially appointed by the Federal Court to the bench.)

12) Including this highly contentious material in their factum is sufficient, it is submitted here, to throw Harris & Co. out of NS courts in a voir dire meeting held before the two sessions requested by the Employer and proceed with the constitutional question. The Employer did not address the constitutional question. If the Employer wishes to enjoin NS legal Counsel subject to the laws of NS, I would have no objection as long as they do not use highly contentious materials from the Harris & Co.'s  Book of Authorities.

13) The two requested meetings relate to a) a specious request for surety which I have addressed in detail in 458698 Exhibit A & B accompanied by a request not to hear my case in any event. To date, the courts have been compliant with the Employer on this level ignoring any arguments set forth by this Plaintiff. For example, while the ON & QC courts assessed costs against me, no bill was received from those lawyers respectively. They obviously do not work for nothing. The right wing North Shore News failed to investigate when the Employer did not respond to my query on this level as to whom paid them?   b) the matter of jurisdiction which is the only real question to consider. The court, for example, may refer this question to be heard back to B.C. but first they must overrule the 'Cullen Creed' by which I was expelled from B.C. in July 2013 'for reasons best known to a judge. No court to date has been willing to challenge that despicable Creed. That Creed and my Response are filed in 458698. Not doing anything as the Employer would ask by requesting the court block any hearing of the constitutional question, is not 'in the cards' in this unresolved labour case where no compensation has been paid. To do that with either of these two hearings is tantamount to destroying the credibility of NS courts and the government of Premier McNeil leaving the citizenry to find justice in the streets similar to QC and SK.

 

ACTION CALLED FOR

14) It has been one week since I called for a voir dire meeting with the court to precede the other two Employer requests in which I call for B.C.'s Harris & Co.'s removal from the province for stated reasons. I have not heard back and yet the Employer has no difficulty having the court unilaterally assigning two new dates (April 6 & 19) for their presentations. Premier McNeil's reputation is on the line with this case as is the reputation of Nova Scotia teachers at large.

15) At this time I call for a postponement if not outright cancellation by the court of the two dates Apr. 6 and Apr.19 unilaterally set by the Employer until I have a date set for the voir dire hearing preceding these other two. If it is not the intention of the court to assign such a voir dire hearing, I request the cancellation of Apr. 6 & 19 hearing dates as well with a direct continuation of this case by 'Referencing' in writing only as originally requested by this plaintiff. Anything else would 'bring the law into disrepute'.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow plaintiff  458698

 

OPEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO POTUS Mr. TRUMP

(Until a successive 21st Century Prime Minister to Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MAR.19 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 12 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now directed to POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M.(Trudeau)  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century. Currently, Nova Scotia teachers in N.S. Claim 458698 against the Employer are the focus of attention with this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister). Prince Edward Island has a similar action against the Union which is currently being frustrated by the court in assigning a docket number so a complaint letter has been written to the P.M.(SEE web MARCH 10-2017.)

 

 

THE LEARNING CURVE

QUOTE: A) '...I know that in law things like guilt and innocence don't really matter. It's what you can prove. The Fifth Witness  Michael Connelly  Response  That explains why for 32 years, my claims are not examined nor is disclosure ordered (which begs the question) as 'I have not proved my claims'; an empty phrase which permits the courts to operate like a Court of Star Chambers. The NS Barrister's Society is yet one in a long list of judicial organizations in deep denial on this point as pointed out in my MARCH 08-2017 Letter.(SEE web). It is how the legal bureaucracies  operate and, in that process, get away with 'murder'; murder of the Justice System that is. Hence, the courts won't hear any aspect of the Employee's Case  because they can't hear it; not without destroying 32 years of fraudulent actions by over 50 judges. It also explains why the anti-employee media have a boycott on this story. That also explains why the authorities are desperate to kill the constitutional question  regarding the relationship between the courts and imposed legislation laid in NS (employer)& PEI (union) and are pulling out all stops to impede the most important civil question of all time. And that in turn is why public exposure is all-important. Are you listening, professional teachers in NS & PEI? (Not so far).

 

B) 'What must be avoided at all costs, is a fundamental deprivation of justice under the law.'

Justice Estey St. Anne Nackawic  This oft quoted phrase - even at my 1985 arbitration by the hypocritical Employer's Counsel - reflects the disjoint in the legal system above raising the question as to why Justice Estey had to raise the point in the first place unless it was a major problem? The Employee's Case must have been the type of case he had in mind but no-one, including Estey j. could ever in his imagination have seen a legal case take the negative turn such as did the Employee's Case. The Justice System is not only frightened, it is terrified and in the words of former P.M. Pierre Trudeau...'It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong'. In that endeavor, I have accomplished the impossible by breaching the glass ceiling of Canada's judiciary. It can never be the same, nor should it be....

 

MESSAGE:

1) Much has been said about Mr. Trump's mental processes. He has a bigger problem; namely, time. He doesn't have enough of it to make the difference he wants nor does the U.S. government.

2) I have spent 32 years refining my 'learning curve' and being senior to Mr. Trump by 5 years, my bottom line is that the U.S. nation cannot withstand a 3 year impeachment process which characterized Watergate at the end of President Nixon's rule. If Trump is not seriously worried about assassination, he should be under these conditions.

3) Similar to Mr. Trump in the Presidency, I was as green as grass when my lay-off went to arbitration suspecting a 'sweetheart deal' but not counting on the venality of over 50 judges in 32 years subverting the course of justice in order to avoid admitting that the authorities made a massive mistake which has taken out the Canadian Justice System and  B.C. government (imposed BILL 35)for all Canadians and yet still leaving this case 'breathing air'. You don't get to call yourself the 'Old Boys Club' by taking the equivalent of a B52 Stratofortress to bomb a mosquito ...and missing.

4) My battle as it has turned out, is with the entire Judicial System. Mr. Trump's battle is with the entire U.S. government system. Other than the time factor, anyone doing battle on this level must know how to read. Mr. Trump is deficient in this area as is 90% of the population.  5) I consider myself a reader which is characterized by continuous reading as the mental muscle is much like a physical muscle requiring daily exercise. While intelligence is a key, it is not the key ingredient as attested to by my school marks . Even many professionals are quite ignorant outside of their discipline. I include lawyers and doctors in that evaluation. Generally, sales people and combat soldiers are readers. Having sociopathic tendencies should not be ruled out. I read on any topic that is well-written. It is the old spirit of Renaissance man (or woman) and non-readers are easily recognized by readers. My greatest enjoyment is my Quotes that I have collected over 50 years of reading plus the annotated cartoons on my web site. (side note: the picture at the top of my Newsletters is designed to keep my photo out of the media...figure out that one)

6) Do I generally recognize newspaper columnists as readers? Yes, with this limitation: they are writing more to the concerns of their editors (why there is a national boycott on the Employee's Case) than to their audience at large which is there to buy papers. Turning to novel writing seems to be their only escape hatch although most novelists 'lose it' (similar to Shakespeare) about 3/4 of the way through as they suddenly clutter their stage with bodies which, in modern parlance, makes for movie material potential.

7) 'The problem with you is that no-one knows what you will do next'. Legal Counsel to me. That's true for the simple reason that I do not know what I will do next...it's called 'thinking on your feet' which my astute businessman father claimed was a rare attribute. That is a key function reflecting one's ability to read. I honed my skills as a long time debating coach.

8) My conclusion reflecting Canada`s bureaucratic oligarchy? PLACARD: A) CANADA LED BY OVERLY AMBITIOUS CLICHÉ RIDDEN JERKS  B) SMART PEOPLE DO NOT LISTEN TO POLITICIANS   C) WHY VOTE? IT ONLY ENCOURAGES THEM.

 

 

March 20-2017                                                                  RCMP

 

TO: RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson                                  FROM: Roger Callow  Nova Scotia 458698

       Personal                                                                                         #2001-1285 Cahill Dr. East

       1200 Vanier Pkwy.                                                                       Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

       Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2           

 

REFERENCE: employescasecanada.ca

 

ANNOTATED QUOTE: 'Everybody lies. Cops lie. Lawyers lie. Witnesses lie. The victims lie. (N.B. And in the Employee's Case, judges lie) A trial is a contest of lies. And everybody in the courtroom knows this. The judge knows this. Even the jury (N.S teachers, lawyers and politicians) They come into the building knowing they will be lied to (On April 6-2017- teleconferencing) They take their seats and agree to be lied to. The trick if you are sitting at the defense table is to be patient (32 years of patience). To wait. Not for any lie. But for the one you can grab onto and forge like a hot iron into a sharpened blade. You then use that blade to rip the case open and spill its guts out on the floor. That's my job...To be the truth in a place where everybody lies.'

The Brass Verdict  Michael Connelly ADDENDUM: ...and the truth of the hearing on April 6-2017 in Halifax beyond point 6 below is whom the Chief Justice with the approval of Premier McNeil appoints to hear this case. In short, the Justice System of Nova Scotia is on trial. Will this province go the same way as QC and SK leaving everything in the lap of the PMO?

 

EMPLOYEE'S CASE - 32 YEAR UNRESOLVED LABOUR CASE=NO COMPENSATION

MESSAGE:    

1) So you are retiring this June which is not soon enough for many of the female RCMP officers who won a class action against gender-sensitive harassment. But I digress.

2) I do not digress, however, when I claim that it was your indolence and that of P.M. Justin Trudeau that cost QC and SK their court credibility. Individuals in those two provinces have nowhere to turn but the streets for justice (Supreme Court of Canada 2016: 36883 QC  and 36993 SK). Now NS courts are on the firing line.

3) How can you help? By seizing the disclosure information relating to West Vancouver School Board's June 1985 meeting notes where the matter of the neophyte BILL 35 and the lay-off of senior teacher, Roger Callow were extensively discussed. 32 years and over 50 judges and yet this matter remains unresolved. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights).

4) I have asked for a voir dire meeting with the NS court to discuss that disclosure request plus alleged fraudulencies in the B.C. Harris & Co. factum. In brief, I have asked that this sleazeball B.C. outfit be barred from NS courts. The Employer should hire NS Council which is bound by NS regulations; not disreputable B.C. oversight bodies.

5) In fact there is no need for the Employer to put in an appearance as the case is limited to the constitutional question (c.q.) regarding the oversight powers of the court as they relate to imposed legislation. The Employer makes no mention of the c.q. in their factum.

6) An honest judge (and I have had over 50 of the 'other kind') could be expected to posit the case thus to Harris & Company:  Do you honestly believe that NS judges are idiots? It is clear from your 500 word submission that there is no reference to the constitutional question raised. And you want to be paid for that? Listen, Mister, 'due process' in NS means just that and NOT 'duly processed' or versions thereof. So no, we are not going to grant you a surety as it seems from the evidence that you are in the habit of collecting from both the Employer and the courts if this former example from SK is any measure. Further, without disclosure which you have evaded for 32 years, your case is built on sand and therefore has no merit. Understandably the Employer in this case does not want to pay compensation but that is not asked for here. Presumably that will require further action in another venue; hopefully B.C. where this issue originated. If the employer wishes to be involved, and the court is not saying that they need to be involved with this narrow constitutional question raised, then they should hire NS legal Counsel which is bound by NS law and not BC law. Be gone. And don't slam the door on the way out.

6) Whatever, no voir dire hearing and we can presume that the NS judge walking into the courtroom on April 6-2017 (teleconferencing) will have had his mind made up at the door.

 

Yours truly,  Roger Callow  Appellant 458698

 

cc NS Court 458698/  Premier McNeil /  P.M. Trudeau

 

P.S. Did Canada, beginning with former P.M. Paul Martin & Defence Minister, Bill Graham, pay Syria, where this type of thing was run as a 'cottage industry' through the offices of the RCMP, to torture such as Arar and others who recently settled for a multi-million dollar 'silence' buy-out of the claims? 

 

DECEMBER 05-2016  SECOND REQUEST  Fax: 902-368-4416

JANUARY 02-2017     THIRD REQUEST

MARCH 22-2017        FOURTH REQUEST

 

May 02-2016

 

TO: Premier & Justice Minister Wade MacLauchlan P.E.I.  FROM: Roger Callow -Appellant

Fifth Floor South-Shaw Bdlg.                                                                      2001-1285 Cahill Drive E.

95 Rochford St. P.O. Box 2000                                                                  Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

Charlottetown, PE  C1A 7N8                                                                       tel: 613-521-1739

 

                                    REFERENCE: employescasecanada.ca     

cc P.M. Trudeau

 

THAT LETTER READ IN PART:    

COMPLAINT:

1) As the Appellant in a legal matter focused on disclosure, I appear to be filibustered by the Charlottetown Superior Court in receiving a docket number.

2) If this filibustering parallels events in other provinces in this highly contentious labour case with its genesis in British Columbia, credibility of the PEI courts may be at stake.  Some Chief Justices in other venues seek to hide behind Registry clerks in order to obviate the assignment of a docket number in order that a legal matter may not be given 'due process'. Judges, not clerks - it is submitted here - should run the court system. As such, your office is negatively affected with any such judicial malfeasance.

 

RETURN OF DOCUMENTS (received March 20-2017) WITH FILING FEE FROM  PEI Registry clerk T. MacPherson Q.C. in which the return letter reads in part: 'As I have indicated to you in previous correspondence, documentation which is non-compliant with the PEI Rules of Civil Procedure will not be accepted for filing and will not be assigned a docket number....' The returned materials are being sent directly to Premier & Justice Minister, W. MacLauchlan, to assign a document number, or alternatively, a different Registry clerk.

 

MESSAGE (March 22-2017)

1) Recently, I called for the suspension of a PEI Registry clerk, Terri Macpherson QC, for obfuscation in the registry of this case. No doubt she was acting on orders, possibly from yourself as Justice Minister which is why I asked for P.M. Trudeau to act on this complaint.

2) Combining your role of Premier & Justice Minister is an egregious act. Can you imagine what President Trump would be able to get away with if it were not for the state courts?

3) Your action of combining the two roles above is reminiscent of the President Kennedy era when father Joe Kennedy - he of dubious ambassadorial background - ordered that the President was to appoint his brother as Attorney General. It worked when Bobby K. called in the Hearst Newspaper chain to effectively kill a story on the dalliances of the President.

4) Of course as a Premier  you would like to control the matter of imposed legislation. And that is what you are doing which does not suit the needs of individual citizens in P.E.I.

5) For example, as a victim of imposed legislation (B.C.'s BILL 35) as a senior teacher at maximum salary, I was 'laid off' in 1985 in what I term as the West Vancouver School Trustee's 'final solution' . No compensation was paid (includes pension rights) thanks to over 50 judges across Canada including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions. The matter of this unresolved labour case has destroyed court systems in such as QC and SK under Premiers Chouinard and Wall. Further, School Trustees across Canada could resolve their financial problems by disposing of senior teachers (it's a two for one ratio with beginning teacher salaries). As such those senior teachers would find themselves unemployable in their given profession.

6) It would seem that as Premier & Justice Minister, that you would take matters one step further; deny me access to PEI Courts making your Justice System into a 'Court of Star Chambers' where access is defined by you as Premier ...and that will never do but will happen unless PEI citizens MAKE NOISE... and make it NOW.

7) As for our effete P.M., how many provinces does he need to lose on court credibility before the people of the nation claim: 'The P.M. ain't  got no clothes on'? As matters stand, the P.M. should consider imposing some sort of trusteeship over PEI courts unless there is immediate change as requested below.

 

ACTION REQUESTED

8) To assign a docket number to the case that I have posted against the B.C. Union concerned as I believe I have responded properly to all 'realistic' revisions asked by your Registry.

 

Yours truly

 

Roger Callow

 

The Outlawed Canadian  in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance

 

Nova Scotia 458698 - March 24-2017

 

Is this NS citizenry?

 

 (re April 07 & 19 hearing dates unilaterally requested by B.C. legal firm, Harris & Co. for the Defendant Employer     

  cc NS court 458698 / P.M. Trudeau / Premier McNeil

 

QUOTE: 'Wherever there is confusion, there is an impulse to simply steer clear of controversy by remaining silent on issues.' Farzana Hassan OS columnist

 

     The scam about to be perpetuated in NS on April 7 was pioneered with SK Premier Brad Wall whom did not want any questioning of his use of imposed legislation nor does it seem, does NS Premier Stephen McNeil. It's too valuable a bargaining chip. Even President Trump appreciates that point. Unfortunately for Wall, he was hoisted on his own petard when the Federal government threatened to impose a carbon tax on him. The Federal government further gamed the Health portfolio with a similar ploy. NS Justice Rosinski scheduled for the second date (April 19-2017) requested by the Employer (no judge yet assigned to the April 07 Hearing) is ignoring my request for a voir dire to analyze the corrupted factum of B.C.'s Harris & Co. after the refusal of the NS Barrister's Society to conduct that examination. I submit that it is a deliberate ploy as a 'last minute' appointment will be made on April 07-2017 so that whatever happens, Rosinski j. will not be blamed if the case does not proceed. Consequently, I have requested that Rosinski j. assign a voir dire  before April 07-2017 or alternatively, hold the April 07 until after the April 19-2017 main hearing. In that voir dire, I request that the disreputable B.C. Harris & Co., which is not bound by NS code of ethics, be thrown out of the province. While it is not necessary for the Employer to have any presence with this case neutral constitutional question (c.q.), I would accept NS representation as they are bound by NS laws.  The April 7 hearing granted to the B.C. Employer is a key date in which Harris & Co. call for a spurious surety as well as a disposal of the c.q. which is their main intention. I paid one such surety in SK and still did not get due process under the law. So why would I pay a surety in NS to the Employer when they have not even addressed the c.q.in their factum in the first place? This fraud is patently obvious and yet I submit the Employer will be successful due to Premier McNeil's demand that all efforts must be used to protect his control of imposed legislation as evidenced by its use against NS teachers last November. Similar to Wall, McNeil is quite willing to sacrifice the credibility of the NS Justice System to that end and will get away with it if the provincial citizens do nothing. So, dear NS readers, phone him, e-mail him, pressure the media, do whatever you have to in order to keep the NS judiciary from being thrown under the bus. And that outcome is for a long, long time. The correct course for the courts is to dispense with Harris & Co. and order the courts to proceed to the handling of the 'case-neutral' constitutional question. What if, the question needs be asked, if the c.q. was asked and heard in another province with that action rubbing the nose of NS in their failure? It's no laughing matter. P.S. I have always learned to look out for 'dichotomy' as evidence of judicial fraud.

 The Outlawed Canadian  employescasecanada.ca 

 

OTTAWA POLICE - MARCH 25

     The schizophrenic media are unable to get the story any longer so the public is left with the judge having the last word. In the O.S. March 25-2017  'No pulling Punches' headline, a local judge threw out the policeman's story regarding assault saying she believed the alleged victim (and obvious drug dealer).

     A little background helps here. If you are a young male in your 20's or 30's in certain parts of town late at night; you can expect to be pulled over on so-called traffic offenses. This specious action permits the police to get weapons and drugs off the street for which charges are later dropped. One problem is that most of these targets are black or of eastern Arab world extraction raising the label of 'carding' which is not entirely inaccurate as these two groups are associated with the drug trade. The question relates to what happens to this contraband? Are 'dirty cops' for example re-selling the drugs?

     What appears to have gone down here is that the dealer hoped to buy his way out of the confiscation; possibly with the $100 counterfeit bills found in his possession. Whatever happened, the deal went sour and the usual 'if you don't lay charges then I will disappear the evidence' went south. The evidence disappeared but the victim charges of assault from this 2015 incident remained & the judge blasted the policeman for his assault on the victim.

     Anyone reading my account can appreciate that judges are not my favourite people but I do not include the 50 plus judicial bozos that the Chief Justices appoint to the Employee's Case with the average judge working sometimes under very difficult circumstances such as here. Here the judge is faced with no evidence (habeas corpus) as the policeman 'lost' it hence her rejection of the police case makes legal sense. Further, what the police are doing in these takedowns is to say, in essence, because judges are not doing their job, we have to. Not a very good idea telling the boss that he or she (female judge in this instance) can't do the job...I can vouch for that one from personal experience and yet I still do it. (In this regard, an observer might ask me why I am continuously banging my head against the wall in the Employee's Case only to get this answer: 'Because it feels so much better when I stop!')

     A second police instance relates to chasing a perp whom was escaping and, when he brought him down, punching him in the head with a knuckle duster. The victim died the following day in hospital. First of all, police in the West do not want perps to take a chance on escaping temporary custody as that greatly increases the risk to bystanders. Hence a 'timely reminder' is given to escape artists. Part of the problem here is that this Arab victim no doubt came from a country where you always raced from the police or soldiers as you would be dead meat in any event. It is a grey area but with the death of the victim, the police officer is looking at manslaughter charges. It depends on the autopsy report.

    

 

OPEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO POTUS Mr. TRUMP

(Until a successive 21st Century Prime Minister to Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MAR.26 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 12 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now directed to POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M.(Trudeau)  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century. Currently, Nova Scotia teachers in N.S. Claim 458698 against the Employer are the focus of attention with this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister). Prince Edward Island has a similar action against the Union which is currently being frustrated by the court in assigning a docket number so a complaint letter has been written to the P.M.(SEE web MARCH 10-2017.)

 

ONE MORE TIME PLEASE, MR. 'OUTLAW'

MESSAGE:

 1) Okay, let's do this all over again. The West Vancouver School Trustees 'Final Solution' is to use imposed legislation to interfere with 'due process of the law' on which the existence of the courts depend.

2) That claim is to deny the existence of the oversight powers of the courts although, presumably, that does not extend to fraud but  just try and get disclosure as all 50 judges and the RCMP plus Prime Minister have their heads stuck in the stand on that point in the Employee's Case.

3) So what are we left with?  Solely the arbitration as the courts do not have the power to overturn an arbitration as happened here, according to the Employer's claim.

4) But what about compensation which is included under the imposed BILL 35? The Employer's response as set forth in Ontario in 2014 (13-59060 McKinnon j. whom ducked the question) was that as the arbitrator did not address the compensation question as per BILL 35 conditions, ergo, the Employer does not owe this employee any compensation.

5) In 1995, I returned to court before Justice Spencer whom recognized court oversight in this matter in terms of Justice Southin whom quashed the arbitration ordering it back, as she did, to the same arbitrator whom subsequently died.

6) In law, Spencer j. was faced with the legal problem of 'frustration'; namely, that no litigant is to suffer deprivation at the expense of a glitch in the law. His choice was either to send the matter back to arbitration with a new arbitrator or alter Southin's should return employment (in law, a court recommendation carries weight) to must return employment due to the abandonment of the case by the Employer, who refused to recognize court overview in any event, to resolve this situation.

7) So the implication is that the Courts are involved in this battle for compensation but in which manner is never made clear leaving me in a perpetual state of limbo. That's how 'no legal answer' became 'a legal answer' = anarchy

8) So why would the courts including over 50 judges throw their lot into signing their death warrant as a bureaucracy as governments can be expected to displace the courts by always passing imposed legislation? The answer to that question is because they got caught up with the initial conspirators - the B.C. Government, the WVST Employer and the local Union - which inveigled Justice Mary Southin in 1986 into compromising herself. And it is the cover-up of that perfidy which is leading to the collapse of other provinces dating from 2013 when I was expelled from B.C. (Cullen Creed) for reasons  'best known to the judge'. QC and SK under their respective Premiers are now lawless provinces leaving citizens bereft of 'due process' unless, of course being 'duly processed' is the order of the day. Only the Prime Minister may intervene in this intolerable situation with his executive powers. The first of these, P.M. Trudeau, is MIA.

9) So how does the constitutional question (cq) in NS 458698 (employer) and in PEI (union) advance your case? It doesn't directly as the cq (the relationship between imposed legislation and court overview) is case neutral and, as such, is aimed at depriving an Employer or government from gaming the system by running an end game around the courts as is happening in the Employee's Case. Further action is required for a settlement in the Employee's Case. (In B.C.?)

10) So, once again, why are the courts 'putting themselves out of business'? Because they got sucked in covering for Justice Southin and as long as the media maintains its boycott, they believe that they can outwait this case. That is why I have appealed to teachers at large. Every year for 32 years B.C. Teachers  have elected a BCTF president whom is complicit in this sweetheart deal. Similar to the courts, they no doubt feel that they cannot admit to their own perfidy. In NS and PEI, that is yet to happen although NS appears about to fall if the NS Barrister's Society's non-action is any indicator. In brief, I may have other options, the provinces of NS & PEI do not if they wish to avoid the calamity of QC & SK where no-one can trust to the courts in those two provinces. Lay-off time is coming up soon and, as matters currently stand, the WVST 'final solution' is the de facto situation and is indeed final for all employees and employers (e.g. Premier Brad Wall and his carbon tax objections under imposed legislation).  MAKING NOISE...NOW by the teachers at large of NS & PEI is the only thing protecting the future of laid-off teachers and their right to a fair tribunal if they choose that course and to eventual compensation according to contract provisions even if they do not choose to go to arbitration.

11) A final consideration is the matter of pension as a senior teacher being laid off might seek to collect a work pension only to find out that the School Board does not accept his retirement as a means of pressuring him or her into accepting their terms for total settlement. I have been held up for 10 years with this type of blackmail. But that is alright with over 50 judges 'who can't be wrong'.

 

The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw  Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance

 

ATTENTION: INHABITANTS OF NOVA SCOTIA

MARCH 28-2017

 

(N.B. THIS APRIL 04-2017 LETTER HAS BEEN ADVANCED TO THE DATE ABOVE AS NOW IS THE TIME FOR THE COURT TO EVALUATE THE B.C. HARRIS & CO. FACTUM IN LIGHT OF THE FAILURE OF THE NOVA SCOTIA 'S BARRISTER'S SOCIETY TO DO SO.) Included is the Harris & Co. request to appear in N.S. (3 pages by fax)

 

TO: NS Superior Court #458698                      FROM: Roger Callow  APPELLANT

Hearing Date April 07-2017                              285 Cahill Dr. E. #2001

c/o The Registrar/The Law Courts                     Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

1815 Upper Water St.                                          tel: 613-521-1739

Halifax, NS  B3J 1S7                                                                                                 

sent by fax: 902-424-0524   (2 pages)           employescasecanada.ca  MARCH 28-2017

 

cc Premier McNeil

 

To whom it may concern:

 

1) The following letter promised to C. McInnes Registrar on March 24-2017 by e-mail was delayed to accommodate any public reaction to what is perceived as the destruction of the credibility of NS Courts based on the evidence of the Defendant represented by B.C.'s Harris & Co. This approach approximates a similar debacle in Saskatchewan by this outfit in 2015-16 now referenced to the P.M. (peace, order and good government or notwithstanding clause?) after the Supreme Court of Canada (36993) refused to hear this matter steeped in judicial fraud. This is the first time, it is submitted here, that the public (in Nova Scotia) has prior knowledge of a scam emanating from the office of Premier S. McNeil through the Chief Justice to carefully 'selected' court judges (this unresolved case has seen over 50 such 'selected' judges in the past 32 years). No compensation has been paid in this illicit senior teacher lay-off in 1985 under the imposed BILL 35 which states that it is 'in addition to' the Schools Act and does not supplant any part of that Act. Ostensibly it was to relate to teacher 'lay-off' solely for economic reasons.

 

2) Harris & Co. unilaterally set two dates - April 07-2017 (surety) & April 19 (general) - with a request to dismiss in both, the constitutional question regarding imposed legislation which some governments are fond of using as a negotiating technique (including McNeil's government against the teachers in November of 2016).

 

3) In their 500 word submission complete with the alleged fraud against them in SK, the Defendant  does not address the constitutional question. Under these circumstances, an honest judge, it is submitted here, would throw Harris & Co. out of NS and send this matter on the constitutional question to be settled by the judges through Referencing.

 

4) In the event that any court action is taken, Harris & Co. must first provide disclosure, something that they have avoided for 32 years with the support of the complicity of over 50 'selected' judges.

 

5) Typical of their abuse is this one for a specious surety. While the courts assigned costs earlier to Ontario's Hicks, Morley et al (since dropped representation of the Employer after being accused of rampant fraud) and Quebec's Lavery de Billy (no better); no invoices were received and therefore not paid from these two legal entities which, in Harris & Co.'s factum, is proof positive of my 'deadbeat' status. In fact, I wrote the West Vancouver School Trustees asking whether they had paid these bills as legal firms do not work for nothing. There was no response nor from the editor of the right wing  North Shore News whom I asked to investigate. On that model, Harris & Co. received double billing in SK when the court paid out funds from a surety without a request from either of the litigants.

 

6) As I will only be in attendance at the April 19 hearing by teleconferencing (if held); I request that the court provide me with a finding (e-mail/fax) ASAP from the April 07 hearing. Both courts have a complete rebuttal in writing from me although past courts studiously avoid referencing such material except in a very casual manner in order to cover their rear ends.

 

 

Yours truly (Roger Callow) APPELLANT