APRIL-2017

 

OPEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO POTUS Mr. TRUMP

(Until a successive 21st Century Prime Minister to Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - APR.01 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 12 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now directed to POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M.(Trudeau)  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century. Currently, Nova Scotia teachers in N.S. Claim 458698 against the Employer are the focus of attention with this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister). Prince Edward Island has a similar action against the Union which is currently being frustrated by the court in assigning a docket number so a complaint letter has been written to the P.M.(SEE web MARCH 10-2017.) This tome on April Fool's Day is labeled  'No Fooling'

NO FOOLING

QUOTES:

A) 'You're an outsider. Outsiders always win.' The Fifth Witness  Michael Connelly

B) 'If you must play, decide upon three things at the start: the rules of the game, the stakes, and the quitting time' Everyone Lies  A.D. Garrett

C) 'There's right and there's wrong, and then there is the law.'  

D) '...Storms will always come, and men will always do evil in the shadow of some other word. It's how we respond that defines us.'  The Bone Tree G.Isles

E) 'P.M. Justin Trudeau is another case of someone who can speak in both languages but can't think in either.'

 

MESSAGE:

1) Where to begin this tome about judicial malfeasance of the system (Employees Case) with all other judicial abuses within the system crowding the media these days? No doubt the media hopes some day to slip the Employee's Case into the list as 'just one more aberration'. It's not.

2) The term imposed  action runs as a common theme in the above case beginning in 1985 with the imposed BILL 35 under which this senior West Vancouver B.C. teacher was laid off in 1985. 32 years later no compensation has been paid due to the chicanery of over 50 judges including the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) on four occasions.

3) How can this happen? By judicial subterfuge in many provinces in Canada. The patterns of that judicial complicity, I hasten to point out, are not new to how justice is meted out. What is new is that by 'ubering' (external threat from an unexpected source) this case by playing the legal events of one province against another, a pattern has evolved which, similar to Plato's 'The Cave' has created shadows on the wall which read conspiracy denoting my moniker as The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance.

In brief, the court is acting as an agent for the Employer in this unresolved case with support from the Union.

4) Let me turn to the current U.S. situation and the deadlock between the President and some state judges as an example of imposed actions. It is said of the two - the pen and the sword - the pen is mightier which is bad news for President Trump whom is facing a 'Civil War' situation. In the 1860's, the South marshalled all the legal arguments as to why they could leave the Union only to be met by a militant North which just said 'no' and waged a war killing off a million men to prove their point. Will that happen again? Not at all as the two sides are expected to resolve their problems otherwise President Trump will be assassinated. In so many words, the pen and the sword are meant to be complementary.

5) The bigger problem for the U.S. government paralleling the Employee's Case is the presence of a Muslim Organization in the U.S. legally challenging the President. Buying them off is a very different proposition if possible at all. Some U.S. judges are doing publicly what Canadian judges are doing behind the scenes in the Employee's Case. Publicity is the watchword here in both countries.

Philosophy

6) Why are the courts and the Employer plus Union leaders frightened of the Employee's Case? If we merely see shadows on Plato's wall as being reality, what is the underlying reality of what promotes those shadows? Euphemistically they are referred to as the 'Old Boy's Club' or in this specific instance 'The grey eminence'

 7) Two examples suffice to make my point here:

a) Of course the sweetheart deal between Employer and Union leaders exists as all dismissals enjoin some communication between the two forces. The key here is that both sides deny such collusion in public. That accounts for the first Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC) (Chief Justice A. Lamers (d.)/ incumbent  Chief Justice B. McLachlin / Cory) rejection of the Employee's Case on the question of the inherent jurisdiction of Unions which , in laymen's language reads sweetheart deal. If the SCofC  had heard that case in 1997, we would not be here today. In brief, The Employer only recognized the imposed BILL 35 as having no court oversight while the courts recognized that only the Union could represent me in terms of lay-off and compensation. For my part, I laid an action in 2010 which really put the cat among the pigeons when I stated that until the three forces - court, employer, and Union sorted out this dog's breakfast, I should be placed back on salary. From that time forward until I was expelled in 2013 from B.C. Courts 'for reasons best known to a judge', the Judiciary started on its long path down the road into dissolution. Of course if disclosure were produced by the Employer in a 32 year filibuster run by the courts to deny me that access; all hell would break loose.

b) The second filibuster relates to compensation under the terms of ultimate remedy which the SCofC refused to hear in 2004. That is what our civil courts are all about...compensation. The courts cannot get around the fact that no compensation has been paid in this case. That's how we became a Third World Country where 'no legal answer became a legal answer'. That contradiction is a de facto recognition of anarchy in our Judicial System. From that there is no recovery. The two SCofC rejections in 2016: 36993 QC and 36883 SK by the same three panel of judges was a reflection of the complete failure of Canada's oversight bodies on many levels leaving this matter in the executive hands of a future 21st century P.M. considering P.M. Trudeau has ducked his responsibilities in this matter...even into sending in the RCMP to seize those disclosure documents.

8) The above sets the stage for the current battle on the case-neutral constitutional question (c.q.) in Nova Scotia 458698 ( Employer) and in PEI (Union) which PEI Premier and Justice Minister W. MacLauchlan is denying me a docket number on flimsy registry regulations (a common ploy even at the level of the SCofC) Denial of court access lies at the foundation of our legal system. I called on the P.M. to invoke a trusteeship over this province until I get a docket number. Judge's Decisions can be appealed; not so Registry actions. Judges are also held to an ethical standard although oversight powers appear to be non-existent in Canada.

9) The 'lawless' B.C. firm of Harris & Co. is attempting to exert the same scam that they ran in SK which explains why I have called on NS teachers, lawyers, and any other individuals to stop the rollercoaster about to wipe out their justice system leaving them in the deplorable state that QC and SK citizens find themselves. April 07 is the key date in that upcoming scam where I demand disclosure before any action may be taken by the court. I also ask that as the Employers factum is replete with fraud which they would have the court condone, to throw Harris & Co. out of N.S. and continue with the c.q. in which the Employer has not offered any input. It is the most blatant of the frauds perpetrated to date and yet if NS collectively does not hop on the back of Premier McNeil, the conspirators (Premier, Chief Justice, Justice Rosinski and the 'fall guy' judge for April 07) will be successful; legal processes be damned....

 

March 23-2017

 

REPLY to Caroline McInnes  Chief Registrar

 

Of course Justice Rosinski is not going to hear the April 07 matter; it is a matter of the left hand 'deliberately' not knowing what the right hand is doing...I have run into that theme before. My point is that the Court, through some mechanism or other, should hold this April 07 meeting after the general hearing on April 19. In the event that the Sept. 07 hearing goes against me, I reserve the right to present my concerns in Justice Rosinski's court. From past experience, I will never get there which will explain how the NS Justice System collapsed. Take this matter up with your Chief Justice whom, I am sure, is fully apprised of these events.

 

Roger Callow  458698

 

LETTER TO P.M. TRUDEAU - APRIL -2017 (A)

MESSAGE:

1) I know why you can do as you please...because the opposition politicians and media through their silence on the Employee's Case  employescasecanada.ca are mere hypocrites and whiners. Such leaders as NDP's Thomas Mulcair and Green Party's Elizabeth May are prime examples of this debauched performance from the 2015 Election. Extending that treatment to the people by passing a BILL on Islamophobia which the public at large doesn't want, seems to be symbolic of your Liberal Party's treatment of 'the people'.

2) Unfortunately the issues from the above case will not go away. The simple answer is for you to send in the RCMP as Prime Minister Harper demonstrated before you with the Senator Duffy debacle. When a P.M. says leap, all the RCMP's horses and all the RCMPP (political police) factotums ask 'how high'? They certainly do not listen to me.

3) So far, as P.M., you have inherited a judicial dog's breakfast from two failed Supreme Court of Canada's (SCofC) cases (2016: QC 36883 & SK 36993) as the SCofC appears to be confusing 'doing their job' with 'running a job' or, if you prefer a legal approach; 'due process' has become 'duly processed'. The inhabitants of those two provinces are without a viable legal system so lack of action on your part leaves litigants vulnerable in all court cases.

4) But that is not why I write. First of all, I do not write about NS 458698 as that will play out in NS courts on APRIL 07. The central question relates to whether the NS inhabitants will let Premier McNeil sabotage the Judiciary for the knowable future by a renegade legal outfit from B.C. The names of the appointee judge(s) and their decision(s) are incidental in that process.

5) Prince Edward Island under Premier and Justice Minister, Wade MacLauchlan is another matter as PEI's judicial credibility is already suspended with his refusal to assign a docket number to a case that I have against the B.C. Union for specious Registry concerns. Access to a court of law is a prime legal resolution and I ask you here to send someone to expedite the process. (Indeed, if you are successful in unilaterally knocking daily  'hearing period' down to one hour per week, you should have adequate personnel for the purpose.)

 

The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance

 

LETTER TO P.M. TRUDEAU  -  APRIL (B)

March 31-2017

TO:                                                                                         FROM:

Rt. Hon.  J. Trudeau P.M.                                                 Roger Callow APPELLANT

REFERENCE: employescasecanada.ca  NS 458698  April 07-2017 (hearing date)

 

MESSAGE:

1) This letter is meant to be a 'heads up' letter to you although I do not know how much of your head is left after sacrificing the legal systems in QC and SK where the inhabitants have nowhere to turn for justice. Now it would appear to be the turn of Nova Scotia:

'March 31-2017 I knew it was a bad omen when B.C.'s Harris & Co. turned up on the scene in NS 458698 (April 07 Hearing Date) when they did not have to do so with this constitutional question regarding imposed legislation. While sounding misogynist, nonetheless, the appointment of a female judge portends disaster as I have learned many times from past experience. I call it the 'Kim Campbell' syndrome. Remember when Brian Mulroney was about to lose the federal election? The Tory men sent in female Kim Campbell whom won 2 votes in all of Canada even losing her own seat in that process. If NS inhabitants do not get active NOW, there will be no NS justice system to get active after April 07-2017. There was no response from the court requesting a voir dire to discuss the obviously fraudulent material in the factum of Harris & Co. (NS Barrister's Society earlier ducking the question) so it looks like a rogue legal iceberg from B.C. is going to sink the SS Titanic NS Justice System.'  from my website RECENT3

2) So once again, if you don't mind mixed analogies (all the way from ice to fire),are you going to fiddle while yet another province burns to the ground?

3) No doubt this is a 'what, me worry' situation where the silence of the lambs (all incumbent M.P.'s whom have no right to succeed to your shoes as P.M.) along with a compliant media boycott, which encourages, in turn, your own silence.

4) As matters now stand, the NS courts cannot act until they demand disclosure, the 32 year filibuster this Employer, the West Vancouver School Trustees, has successfully maintained before over 50 judges. That hasn't stopped other courts from acting, will it stop NS? Will you have a 'third notch' to your belt? You can stop the carnage with your executive powers.

5) In case I am wrong about the media, I am forwarding a copy of this letter to CBC's Go Public, ...you know, the outfit you recently bailed out from Harper misery.

The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance.

April 02-2017 (B.C. Election - MAY 09-2017)

 

 

TO: B.C. Premier Christy Clark                          FROM: Roger Callow APPELLANT

via e-mail: premier@gov.bc.ca                         Nova Scotia 458698 (H.D. April 07-2017)

                                                                                    employescasecanada.ca

MESSAGE:

1) You may wonder how a B.C. West Vancouver senior teacher lay-off in June of 1985 under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 has led to Nova Scotia courts 32 years later. Short answer? Because no compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid due to judicial malfeasance.

2) All of us have our opinions about firing brutal policemen or incompetent teachers (we all have our list on that one!) but what about firing corrupt judges? (only if a judge crosses prurient grounds e.g. telling a rape victim...'Couldn't you keep your legs closed?', is a judge removed from the bench) The problem is universal as illustrated by the story below.

3) In the land of the Blind, the one-eyed man is king, the story is told about a white judge called on to adjudge a dispute between two rivals of different tribes. Realizing that the tribes did not want war to break out between them which would happen if one of the litigants disagreed with the decision, the trial actually consisted of the judge assessing which litigant was least likely to revolt. He guessed correctly for when he announced his decision, all eyes were on the loser in a dead silence until he stood up and, after a pause, laughingly threw his headgear on the ground. The trial was over and no blood was shed between the tribes.

4) Similarly, judges do not like to have their judgments appealed which explains why they tend to favour the rich and powerful. Woe to the individual litigator such as yours truly.

5) Such legal novelists as Michael Connelly, Scott Turow, and John Grisham are experts in legal analysis on the above level with this difference: they are limited to a 'linear' development of lower court, appeal court and the Supreme Court.

6) No writer has envisaged the court being ubered (unexpected attack from an external force) which has created a dimension which has destroyed the provinces of QC & SK and is well on its way to doing the same thing in Nova Scotia on Friday, all because Deputy Chief Justice Cullen expelled me from B.C. in 2013 for 'reasons best known to himself' in an unresolved case with your A.G. Suzanne Anton ducking out of the problem.

 

ACTION REQUESTED

7) What are you prepared to publicly tell those B.C. residents faced with onerous court procedures as exemplified by the Employee's Case?

 

TIME LIMIT

8) Should you choose not to respond to the above request by APRIL 15-2017, my advice to the B.C. electorate is...             DON'T  VOTE

 

The 'Outlawed Canadian' in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance.

 

POST IN STAFFROOM - e-mail colleagues

 

 

URGENT

April 04-2017

 

TO: Board of School Trustees                                                     FROM: Roger Callow 

(S.D. #45 West Vancouver, B.C.)                                               1285 Cahill Drive East #2001

1075-21st Street, West Vancouver, B.C. V7V 4A9               Ottawa ON K1V 9A7

tel: 604-981-1000   fax: 604-981-1001

                                     

SENT BY FAX  (1 page)                                                    

 

cc NS Court 458698 / NS Premier S. McNeil           employescasecanada.ca

 

REFERENCE : Harris & Co.  for the Board of School Trustees (West Vancouver, B.C.) NS 458698

 

MESSAGE:

1) I implore you to drop your picayune obfuscation in the above case and permit the 'case-neutral' constitutional question to proceed.

 

2) While I have alternatives, the McNeil government and the Nova Scotia courts do not and will surely follow in the footsteps of the failed provinces of QC and SK and for what? So that a bullheaded eminence gris can save face at the expense of the entire Canadian Justice System.

 

3) A euphemism for the above judicial order is 'Old Boy's Club' which is entrenched in Canada's judiciary. If I had to put a face to it; I would refer to the Canadian Council of Chief Justices presided over by Frank McArdle, the husband of retiring Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Beverly McLachlin.

 

4) In brief, no-one gains, but Nova Scotia is in the position of going the way of QC and SK for which there is no recovery.

 

5) In the event that you disregard this pointed message, provide the necessary 32 year old sought after disclosure so that I may exit NS and lay a fraud charge in B.C. where this case has its genesis. Disclosure is at the heart of habeas corpus and therefore our entire Justice System. Don't let the eminence gris throw it under the bus for the sake of a rinky dink labour issue regarding an illicit senior teacher lay-off where all the principal conspirators are long gone leaving West Vancouver taxpayers with the bill  (I know, I know, it sounds like the recent projected Federal budget for 2050 - it's a decrepit mode of thinking).

 

Yours truly,

 

 

Roger Callow   APPELLANT  458698

 

OPEN LETTER ADDRESSED TO POTUS Mr. TRUMP

(Until a successive 21st Century Prime Minister to Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - APR.08 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 12 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now directed to POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M.(Trudeau).  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century. Currently, Nova Scotia teachers in N.S. Claim 458698 against the Employer are the focus of attention with this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister. Today's Newsletter is focused on the cataclysmic events about to unfold in a Nova Scotia courtroom on April 07-2017

QUOTES:

A) 'Be thine own palace, or the world's  your jail.' John Donne

B) '...ignoratio elenchi, the common fallacy in logic, by the media (and possibly the NS courts in 458698) of supposing a point proved by an argument proving something not at issue. Letter to editor

C) 'Every evil is easily crushed at birth; allow it to become established and it always gathers strength. Dictator  Robert Harris

 

NOVA SCOTIA 458698 - 'A READER'S GUIDE' (for APR. 07-2017)

1) Inhabitants of Nova Scotia may wake up on Monday morning April 10, only to realize that their Justice System has gone the way in the spirit of 2016 of Couillard's QC (SCofC 36883) and Wall's SK (SCofC 36993) which cost the Canadian Justice System its credibility and P.M. Trudeau his stature (equivalent to loss of credibility e.g. Mr. Trump)

2) To appreciate the significance of the outcome of 458698 on April 07, the Defendant  Harris & Co. unilaterally arranged hearings - April 07 (surety) to be followed by an April 19 general hearing - both of which would seek to dispose of the constitutional question.

3) To understand the background to the above, we have to revert to the 'cleverness' of B.C. Justice Mary Southin's actions in 1986 in which she quashed the arbitration favouring the West Vancouver School District against this senior teacher under the imposed  BILL 35 ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be patently unreasonable.

4) In fact Southin was patently unreasonable. The above smokescreen was to cover the fact that she had failed to charge various figures e.g. School Board Counsel and administrative figures with perjury; inactions to be done at my personal expense.

5) The above cover-up of School Board meeting notes from June-1985 forms the basis of a 32 year judicial search for disclosure obviated by over 50 judges (SCofC on 4 occasions with the last 2 in 2016)

6) Without that disclosure, I submit that the Nova Scotia court cannot and must not act on any Harris & Co. request including dismissal of the 'case neutral' constitutional question regarding imposed legislation as it relates to the courts. The easy way out is for the courts to ignore the submissions from the rogue B.C. Harris & Co. and send the constitutional question up to the court through a legal process called Referencing conducted largely apart from my factum, which is my request.

7) My advice to the court is NOT to pull a 'Southin'. In brief, it would appear that the grey eminence has sucker punched Premier McNeil into ditching this case thus permitting the government to retain full control over imposed legislation.

8) The proper course for the NS courts, is to jail Harris & Co. for perjury. Unfortunately, in this regard, the Nova Scotia Barrister's Society  ducked my request to analyze their 500 word factum; a pattern which led to 'success' for the Defendant in QC & SK but at the cost of the judicial future of those two provinces and ultimately, Prime Minister Trudeau. Will NS seek to emulate this cleverness, even spreading it across 2 hearings as the Defendant would propose?

9) In contrast to QC & SK where inhabitants were kept apprised of unfolding events, inhabitants of  NS have prior notification of how they are to lose their Justice System thus necessitating public action NOW (posting of this account made on March 29-2017), not later.

 

 

April 10-2017

 

TO: B.C. Premier Christy Clark                          FROM: Roger Callow APPELLANT

via e-mail: premier@gov.bc.ca                         Nova Scotia 458698 (H.D. April 07-2017)

1 page                                                                                   employescasecanada.ca

 

MESSAGE:

1) With all the turmoil of an election, I doubt whether you will respond to my April 01 letter regarding how the 32 year unresolved B.C. Employee's Case is turning other provinces upside down. QC & SK have been followed down the legal credibility 'rabbit hole' by NS with its (pending)  failure to broach a constitutional question (c.q.) underlying this case.

2) That question relates to the relationship of imposed legislation to the oversight powers of the court. In the Employee's Case dealing with the illicit lay-off of senior West Vancouver teacher, Roger Callow, in June of 1985 under the imposed BILL 35, the Employer recognizes only the Bill 35 conditions, the courts recognize only the unions jurisdiction in this sweetheart deal while, as the targeted victim, I don't give a damn about jurisdictions as compensation is due to me whether it is under BILL 35 conditions, the collective bargaining conditions (union) or some other mechanism under contract law.

3) The Employer has been able to game the system by paying no compensation and over 50 judges have sacrificed key legal concepts such as disclosure (which would show fraud and therefore guarantee court oversight) to permit them to leave this case in limbo = anarchy.

4) Rather than witnessing other provinces falling into this legal black hole without equal, you can make a difference by filing the above constitutional question as premier with the courts according to your constitutional right. Destroying other provinces with this B.C. case has to stop but will not stop unless the B.C. premier (you are expecting to win are you not on May 9?) takes affirmative action.

5) The definition of that question is found on my web site. In essence, it is this: Does imposed government legislation (g.l.) displace statute law (s.l.) where the g.l. is 'in addition to' s.l. with no stated revisions of s.l?  The Employer says yes; the courts won't say to date. It should also be noted that this c.q. applies to Employers as well e.g. Premier Brad Wall's carbon tax thus making it the single most important question in Canadian jurisprudence.

6) In brief, should you renew your mandate on May 9-2017, the following day will be the beginning of the worst phase of your political career if you do not act now as submitted above.

7) Until a resolution is found in this long drawn out affair, I continue to be an employee of the West Vancouver School District albeit an unpaid one in this case of delayed salary.

 

 ADDENDUM: In the April 07 hearing of NS 458698 for which I filed copious materials (which are customarily not read by the courts), I requested two things without which the court could not act: a) disclosure which has been evaded by the Employer supported by the courts for 32 years and b) a voir dire hearing to examine the obviously fraudulent claims made in the Employer's factum.  The credibility of N.S. courts rise or fall in how they handle that question limited to the 'case-neutral' constitutional question outlined above.

 

The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance

 

OPEN LETTER TO 'GO PUBLIC'-CBC

(Until a successive 21st Century P.M. to 'Ambassador' Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - APR.22 - 2017 JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 13 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now re- directed from POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M; now 'Ambassador Trudeau'.  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century.  This current challenge is to this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister. Today's Newsletter  reflects my reaction to NS 458698 (Apr.06) in which the NS inhabitants lost their government, their courts and their self respect and now join the failed provinces of QC & SK with 'Hood law' which, in essence, is no law at all. Read on.

 

QUOTES: (based on excerpts from GO PUBLIC  APRIL 15-2017  SEE web NOVA SCOTIA REPERCUSSIONS

A) '...ignoratio elenchi, the common fallacy in logic, by the media (and  the NS courts in 458698) of supposing a point proved by an argument proving something not at issue.

B)  The Justice Jennifer Hood Syndrome: A defeated litigant in a court case anywhere in Canada may now claim to be 'hooded' to account for judicial malfeasance as a sworn affidavit is now not 'worth the paper on which it is printed'. In effect, she vaporized the Justice System of Canada .

G) '...The trick is to convince yourself early on that your cause is just and then forget about it, put all the indignation aside and get down to the hard work of winning. Winning is not so much about being right as it is about surviving the obstacle course, prevailing over the endless pitfalls.' The Halls of Justice  Lee Gruenfeld

I) 'But there comes a moment in history when ignorance is no longer a forgivable offense... a moment when only wisdom has the power to absolve.' Inferno  Dan Brown

J) Trudeau makes an excellent 'ambassador' as witnessed at the JUNO Awards...but for those who like 'a little more meat on their government'; he's a disaster. From now on, I will refer to him as 'Ambassador Trudeau'

 

'VAPORIZATION' a new legal term to accompany 'Hood law' & 'Hood Solution'

1) The Justice System does not much like me as I expose judicial perfidy illustrating that the raison d'etre operation of the Justice System is, indeed, the 'whim of a judge'...and that will never do as the significance of this case will permeate every other legal case brought to court anywhere in Canada. Since 2013, the novel term ubering has been applied to judicial mayhem as it is experienced in courts right across Canada in the Employee's Case, the NS courts being the current victim under Justice Suzanne Hood. I have coined the term 'hooded' to apply to any losing litigant accompanied by 'Hood law' and 'Hood solution'.

 

2) So what did Hood j. exactly do that vaporized the Justice System? She merely assigned costs in a fixed amount to be given to the defendant Employer's counsel, B.C.'s Harris & Co. without any written explanation in her Order. That rather innocuous action has, in effect, vaporized Canadian Justice. Was it for a 'surety' based on the badly compromised 'Book of Authorities' of the Employer which saw the 2016 defeat of such provinces of QC & SK? We don't know. Was there some other basis in law to award such sums? Again, we don't know as law for Hood j. operates on a whim.

 

3) The key effect of this judicial whim is that it makes a mockery of the Justice System by reducing sworn affidavits to 'mere scraps of paper' although no-one can be sure as she does not call her Order a 'surety' nor does she make any reference to the bogus 500 page 'Book of Authorities'. That's what passes for justice in her court. That's why I have called for her removal from the bench in a story in which a rogue B.C. legal firm 'tail' has wagged the NS 'judicial dog'. NS now falls into the same 'failed state status ' as QC and SK before it.

 

4) To add insult to injury, Hood j. won't permit the April 19 meeting scheduled by the Employer to proceed until the 'cost' has been paid. I earlier reserved the right to question that any action taken in her court be available for discussion at this 'main' hearing. I call this 'cowboying'; a term initiated for ON Justice McKinnon (13-59060) April 23 (& September 15) 2014 whom cancelled a hearing assuming that he knew the parameters of that proposed hearing. Such action is paralleled by its cousin term of anarchy; retrogressive legislation.

 

5) On April 12-2017,  I  re-instituted a constitutional question listing the B.C. Teachers Union as the Defendant in this 'case-neutral' appeal where the Employer's adulterated factum is not available to them (although to be sure, not a problem for the likes of Hood j. whom acts completely outside the law).

 

6) Regrettably the inhabitants of NS did not hit the bricks such as the teachers organized by their Union leaders did last November to protest threatened imposed legislation. My plea to that end fell on deaf ears. The alternative for laid off teachers anywhere in Canada to being laid off due to imposed legislation (such as this writer was under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35) is to be laid-off under contract law on May 31. Due to the 'Hood solution'; statute law no longer has meaning under any conditions as any Canadian teacher - for that matter anyone - contesting a dismissal is subjected to 'Hood law' which is no law indeed. Next time, teachers will listen to my pleas such as the Prince Edward Island teachers where Premier and Justice Minister, Wade MacLauchlan, is running his own form of 'Hood law' by frustrating the registration of a case I have lodged in PEI; a not uncommon stunt as part of the 'Hood solution' of avoiding uncomfortable judicial truths found in other venues.

 

7) Where can the 'Hood solution' breach the entire nation? Anywhere. For example,  I am watching the 'war of the wristbands' between the police and the Somali community in Ottawa over a manslaughter charge for an Officer take-down and subsequent death of a Somali perp.

The media plea of 'giving due process a chance' is falling on deaf ears - as it should considering the extant 'Hood solution'. My recommendation for both sides is to yell and scream right across Canada with your wristband campaign as I have done for 32 years and counting. For example, say 'to Hell' to your lawyer's admonishment not to speak out on the particulars of your case 'as it might negatively impact your standing in court'. Take those particulars - such as the West Vancouver School Trustees did in 1985 - and bandy them about in the anti-employee media (see web Red Neck Media). That's how one side or the other is going to win this political police trial in Ottawa.

 

8) To be sure, U.S. President Trump has every reason now that Canadian law has been 'vaporized', to insist that all U.S. commercial deals involving Canada must be tried in U.S. courts with the U.S. government guaranteeing payment in the case of a U.S. success and to be extracted from Canada through other means.

 

9) One thing which I cannot emphasize enough. With the vaporization of the law, it is extremely unwise to 'go through channels' such as the Organization FAIR would do in its unsuccessful bid to protect whistleblowers.

 

10) As matters now stand with Hood law (which is no law at all), no-one should vote in a Provincial or Federal election.

 

APRIL 14-2017

a) THE EMPLOYEE'S CASE,  b) THE OTTAWA POLICEMAN CHARGED WITH MANSLAUGHTER IN A TAKEDOWN AND 

c) GUANTANAMO BAY

MESSAGE:

1) The answer to b) lies in c) as shaped by a)

2) As a precursor, I am reminded of the comments of a public relations expert dealing with the recent physical expulsion of a passenger on a United Airlines plane (we found this airline problematical with their bumping procedures as well) by stating that the first thing you do is to corral all the lawyers in another room while you diffuse the situation.

3) Similarly in a) Premier McNeil failed to put the grey eminence (see web) in another room letting the 'Hood Syndrome' (Justice Suzanne Hood) vaporize the entire judicial system by reducing a sworn affidavit to a 'mere scrap of paper'. It was a wasted effort and now Nova Scotia is a legal wasteland joining two other 'failed' provinces, Quebec (Supreme Court of Canada 36883) and Saskatchewan (SCofC 36993) both in 2016 which collapsed over the same Employer 'Book of Authorities' . Premier McNeil destroyed Nova Scotia as the same issue has  resurfaced with the Union as 'defendant' where this corrupted information is not available. Indeed, the constitutional question of the relationship between imposed legislation and the courts - the single most important legal question in Canadian jurisprudence - is the same one raised by the Union before the arbitrator in 1985 but was ignored in his Decision (later quashed by the court ruling him to be patently unreasonable. But here's the point; the Employer does not recognize court oversight for the imposed B.C. Government BILL 35

4) Back to our story. Let's begin with the Roman judge ordering the crucifixion of Christ. 'Yup, had to be done...the Jerusalem Church demanded it...can't have anyone undermining their authority by claiming to be the 'son of God'. Besides, this guy was asking for it.' When given the choice to release one victim; the crowd chose 'the thief' over Christ...so don't go around blaming the Romans for what followed for the next few centuries!' This version is a lawyer's delight. The Christian movement based on a martyrdom of old would be paralleled by the modern Falun Gong movement centered on protesting the harvesting of body parts. As a party of one with national ramifications, my cause is being martyred on the cause of national stability however that is being defined. In the battle of evil against good, evil stands no chance of winning when good just 'keeps on a'comin'!

5) In closing Guantanamo Bay where U.S. Special Forces were involved in 'waterboarding'; and turning the few remaining cases over to the civilian FBI for prosecution; the U.S. had a problem; what about those prisoners whom were 'ghosted'; or, in Ottawa police speak, died under the process? Trust to the lawyers for this U.S. answer: Waterboarding  (the new national Olympic Sport?) is not torture, followed up by the threat to incarcerate any lawyer who made any reference to torture in these civilian cases. The Canadian grey eminence must have marveled at that sleight of hand. Maybe the death of the perp under takedown was not manslaughter after all; merely just a policeman doing his duty. The public just does not understand police culture!  Oh, what would the 'Hood Syndrome ' do in vaporizing that situation?

6) My bet is a 'win' for the policeman in 'two'; the method so favoured by Hood Law and Hood Solution. After losing in the lower court and being dismissed, the policeman will win on Appeal but will not get his job back. ...why, that is a 'win-win' solution for the Hood Syndrome on all levels...just like that Roman judge of old mentioned above.

7) Without taking sides, my suggestion is that both sides extend their bracelet program clear across Canada. This is a political case (similar to the Employee's Case), not a legal one. Even 'Horton in Whoville realized that you had to holler and shout to get everyone out' which just didn't happen in Nova Scotia recently. Google Maps will now have to paint a clear yellow streak down the spine of their peninsula.

8) Former P.M. Pierre Trudeau reflected the Canadian drama in 1982 with the repatriation of the Constitution (BNA Act of 1867 a British document) when he stated that the Supreme Court of Canada 'ducked the central question'; namely, how many provinces must approve of the patriation? (Quebec still maintains its right of veto). However, imposed legislation is imposed legislation as even President Trump can assert despite those pesky state courts maintaining their veto powers.

9) The reason that the Canadian Courts collapsed beginning in 2004 in the Employee's Case, is that the SCofC denied hearing the unresolved Employee's Case under the terms of ultimate remedy  (courts must put a price tag on every civil action) thus reducing Canada to Third World status. All other cases under SCofC refusal 'to hear' were left with a lower court decision; not so the orphan unresolved Employee's Case which the authorities would seek to vaporize as per the Hood Syndrome.

10) When this litigant was expelled from B.C. in 2013 for 'reasons best known to a judge' (but clearly understood by the grey eminence) he was left wandering in the kafkaesque desert of the rest of Canada seeking judicial clarification in this story which is seeing Canadian provinces dropping like bowling pins in their efforts to duck out; the Hood Syndrome being the most recent example in Nova Scotia (SEE employescasecanada.ca  NOVA SCOTIA REPERCUSSIONS)

11) The myopic anti-employee media has gone the same way as the courts with their silly boycott on the Employee's Case. Through a process I call reverse osmosis, individual litigants will have to be declared 'sanctuary cities' to protect them from rapacious court treatment.

12) To quote Lord Acton: All power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. To juxtapose columnist Farzana Hassan's column 'Where are Canada's motions condemning extremism and terror?'(Islam reference) Ottawa Sun Apr. 14-2017 p.21, the answer lies with the inhabitants of Nova Scotia whom are hiding out from Canada's local brand of legal terrorism.

13)The anti-employee Canadian media is reeling after being judge, jury and executioner in two separate recent trials in which the 'culprits' (Senator Mike Duffy and CBC ex-employee, Jian Ghomeshi) were exonerated by the courts. Add to that their miscalculating of so many election outcomes and one can see why they are 'going under for the third time'.

14) If it can be said of the establishment of the casino trade in Atlantic City that organized crime money was the only money in town, it could be said of the Canadian Judiciary at the time of its creation, that the only show in town was the grey eminence.

15) PLACARDS:  A)  STAY OUT OF A CANADIAN COURTROOM UNLESS YOU FIRST BUY THE JUDGE   B) THE LAW IS BROKE YET PLENTY FIXED AS IT IS  C)CANADIAN COURTS - THE FAT LADY HAS SUNG

 

APRIL 15-2017

THE HOOD SYNDROME (vaporizing the Justice System) WITH HOOD LAW

(which is really no law at all) & HOOD SOLUTION (cover-up)

MESSAGE: 458698 Nova Scotia

1) Where did it all start? Perhaps with this line from former West Vancouver, B.C. School Superintendent Ed Carlin shortly before my senior teacher lay-off in 1985: "You're not f____ing well going to tell me how to do my job!" Perhaps he should have listened to me as he was let out of the School District the following year never to serve again in the public education field.

2) Fast forward to April 06,  2017 in 458698 (Nova Scotia) where Justice Suzanne Hood reacted to me in much the same fashion bringing the course of justice and law in all of Canada, let alone Nova Scotia, into disrepute by vaporizing the Justice System.

3) While there are many parameters to the situation, the outline of the argument is this:

a) The grey eminence (Old Boys Club) was in the habit for 32 years of shutting down the unresolved Employee's Case where ever it raised its head in a kind of 'whack-a-mole' routine.

b) To some extent, the Employer was in the habit of 'spilling their guts' in their anointed 'Book of Authorities' as a means of protecting themselves against possible future recriminations. "The court in their actions did not question this 'corrupt' action did they? Ergo, they gave tacit approval to our 'nefarious' deeds," would go their argument.

c) The vaporizing process began in the provinces of QC (36883 Supreme Court of Canada 2016) & SK (36993 SCofC  2016 with the same 3 panel of judges who refused a hearing leaving the matter to the executive powers of a Prime Minister with Trudeau also ignoring this matter.

The point here is that with a lack of action by either the SCofC or P.M. I was left in a veritable kafkaesque desert looking for my 'burning bush'.

4) That burning bush was provided by Hood j. in Nova Scotia and, while not going into the details, her action validated my claim that a sworn affidavit is 'not worth the paper on which it is written'. All legal actions call for sworn affidavits.

5) That's why I have called for the removal of Justice Hood from the bench, for any losing litigant in any legal matter in Canada may now claim to be 'hooded'. The ramifications are immense. For example, the police manslaughter charge in Ottawa in a perp takedown has both sides marketing bracelets of support which is little more than saying that 'due process' should be more appropriately labeled 'duly processed' if the Employee's Case is any example which I submit that it is.

6) Shafting the Constitutional Question in NS regarding the relationship between imposed government legislation and the oversight powers of the court is the single most important legal debacle in Canadian jurisprudence. The Union raised this question in the original B.C. arbitration in 1985but was ignored. More recently the Employer raised this question in Ontario in 2014 (13-59060 McKinnon j. - see web) where again it was also ignored.

7) So why is the grey eminence so bent on undermining the hearing of this question? My response? Because over 50 judicial collaborators on the bench have, in effect, told me... 'You're not f______ing well going to tell us how to do our jobs!' In brief, it is a defensive mechanism in which the grey eminence is quite prepared to destroy governments and courts in order to protect their own kind. It doesn't get any bigger than that.

 

 

LAW OF 'REVERSE OSMOSIS' or 'The dog didn't bark': No foreign entity  should deal with a Canadian court. Here's why. The central argument of the Employer in the Employee's Case is that court oversight is not applicable with imposed legislation. In the Employee's Case the arbitration favouring the Employer is final according to the Employer and not the court ruling that quashed the arbitration decision ruling, in that process, the arbitrator to be 'patently unreasonable' (he had converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with Callow to be the necessary 17th lay-off). But where will you find the Employer's 'imposed' argument in the courts? Justice Southin whom quashed the arbitration makes no mention of this aspect. Nor does the Appeal Court which supported her decision. In 1995 where Spencer j. made this a Union matter in this 'sweetheart deal' (where the Union was not even present) makes no mention of this topic of imposed legislation. The 1996 Employer letter threatens the B.C Labour Board off with this concept (my only option after the Spencer ruling) so that no 'Section 12' hearing is ever heard. In 2013, when I was expelled from B.C. Courts for 'reasons best known to a judge' with the consequent kafkaesque search across Canada for a resolution lead to much court corruption as reflected currently in the failed states of Quebec, Saskatchewan in 2016, and more recently, Nova Scotia in 2017 taking out, in that process, the Supreme Court of Canada (which, while not excusing the conspirators, is at the source of this debacle under Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin) and the credibility of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. So go back and read the opening sentence.

 

Under these conditions, no ethical voter should vote in a Canadian Federal or Provincial election.

 

APRIL 17-2017

ILLICIT  DRUGS

 

1) There are 3 things wrong with almost anything dealt with by the 'bureaucracy' including the legitimacy of the use of marijuana a) dumb  b) dumber  c)dumbest, and not necessarily in that order.

 

2) As one adamant against illicit drug use; nonetheless, I sanction the 'decriminalization' of the use of marijuana for small amounts considering the defeat of 'the battle against drugs' for many decades now which were little more than a legal boondoggle at much cost to human misery and taxpayer expense.

 

3) We have the scourge of alcoholism but many drinkers are content with social drinking. Not so smokers whom are addicted to their habit. Occasional smokers do not exist.

 

4) Now Canada wants to create a new level of addiction with the marijuana habit with so-called government controls which smacks of the same uselessness as trying to herd pigs. It can't be done.

 

5) Organized crime will love this new government boondoggle as users will quickly realize that the illicit marijuana has more bang for the buck than the government source for the secret reason that dealers will lace their marijuana with cocaine thereby ensuring addiction. To raise money for their habit, addicts turn to crime, thus returning the whole effort back to the problems of human misery and taxpayer costs for incarceration. What goes around will come around in this ill thought out venture.

 

March 19-2017

 

TO: Nova Scotia Barristers Society                    FROM: Roger Callow NS 458698

Cogswell Tower                                                                    1285 Cahill Drive #2001

800-2000 Barrington Street                                             Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

Halifax NS B3J 3K1                                                  

F: 902-429-4869  1  page sent by fax

                       

MESSAGE:

1) If you had taken my letter to you of March 05-2017 seriously, the collapse of not only NS court credibility but all of Canada could have been avoided. Now no-one can trust to a court of law due to the precipitate action of NS Justice Suzanne Hood on April 06-2017 which Deputy Prothonotary Rhiannon Morgan B.A. would confirm by cancelling out the April 19th hearing date at the request of the rogue B.C. Law firm, Harris & Co.

 

2)  Earlier I had confirmed in a telephone call from the court that I would be in attendance at the April 19th hearing and did not agree with any postponement of this hearing requesting in that process, $15,000 costs from the B.C. Employer for cancelling the second date without my approval to equate with the $15,000 cost assignment for unknown reasons by Hood j. Any precipitate  action taken by Hood was to be reviewed at that second hearing.

 

3) In brief, Harris & Co. successfully pulled the same one-two suckerpunch which they used in SK and the government and courts of Premier McNeil blithely swallowed the whole scam.

 

4) The initial problem dates back to the failure of the NS Barrister's Society to investigate this matter although it does not excuse the court's failure to conduct a voir dire as I requested before any hearings were held. At the very least, both investigations would have insisted that NS legal counsel for the Employer be appointed as NS legal counsel would be bound by NS laws and not those of a dissolute B.C. Legal Society which is complicit in protecting Harris & Co. as seen from the SK debacle. The Employer earlier hired Hicks, Morley et al for Ontario (since dropped their representation) and Lavery de Billy which found it easier to just turn the Quebec Justice System on its head. Both appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada were not heard. So what is wrong with NS courts and government that they would not insist on local representa- tion under these circumstances?  In so many words, why is the grey eminence (Old Boys Club) able to walk all over the courts and governments of Canada, especially NS considering this egregious background?

 

5) Currently I am awaiting the registration of an action on a constitutional question listing the B.C. Union as Defendant although the case-neutral approach is not expected to produce any opposition. Further, the badly compromised 'Book of Authorities' by Harris & Co. is not available to them. Indeed, I would be surprised if they filed a response as all argument may be filed through myself as plaintiff.

 

6) The impression left by the outcome of your initial failure is that NS is ruled by a crooked Chief Justice and has an idiot (Stephen MacNeil) for a premier.

 

 

Yours truly (Roger Callow) The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System due to systematic judicial malfeasance.

 

cc  Premier McNeil / NS Supreme Court 458698

 

April 21-2017

 

TO:                                                                                         FROM:

Rhiannon Morgan  Deputy Prothonotary                   Roger Callow  plaintiff 

Supreme  Court of Nova Scotia                                      #2001 - 1285 Cahill Drive E.

1815 Upper Water St.                                                      Ottawa, ON K1V-9A7

Halifax, N.S. B3J 1S7                                                         tel: 613-521-1739

tel:  902-424-6940                                                                       

fax: 902-424-0536            Sent by fax 1 page

 

Re: Roger Callow v. The WVTA (#45 West Vancouver,B.C.)/BCTF parent Unions

 

MESSAGE:

1) An action was sent by this plaintiff by fax on April 12-2017 to be assigned a docket number with the amount and method of fee payment to be assigned. There has been no reply.

2) Granted that court Registries in many venues when they see me coming in this 32 year unresolved labour matter with its genesis in B.C., prefer to see themselves going with an improper use of the Registry functions  to that end. Regrettably, that feature operates under the radar of media exposure.

3) For a number of years, Registrar Roger Bilodeau of the Supreme Court of Canada and I did battle over an interpretation of Section 40 of the SCofC until his response smacked of 'fine, you want a docket number; then I will give you not one but two docket numbers' in 2016: 36883 QC and 36993 SK, both rejected for a hearing held under the same three SCofC judges amidst my strenuous objections in this 'pound of flesh' exercise.

4) My point here is not so much against the outcome which went against me; rather, it is the fact that I was given 'due process' of the law which is not the case above in NS in the new action (nor for that matter the arbitrary stalling in Prince Edward Island under Premier and Justice Minister, Wade MacLauchlan, where I am in the process of requesting that the Lieutenant Governor form a trusteeship considering access to court facilities is paramount in any democracy without which there can be no smooth government.)

5) I am always prepared to modify my factum to accord with legitimate requests which requires, in my case, a one-on-one with Registry officials. Doing nothing is not an option.

6) Recently, one of my cases in NS - 458698 - was hamstrung. No matter how egregious Justice Suzanne Hood's precipitate action may have been; nonetheless, it is a court of law and not an egregious 'review by a Registry Star Court' in which this action functioned. Please give me a call (request includes P.E.I.).

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow

 

cc Premiers S. McNeil  & W. MacLauchlan

 

OPEN LETTER TO 'GO PUBLIC'-CBC

(Until a successive 21st Century P.M. to 'Ambassador' Justin Trudeau steps up for Canada)

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - APR.29 - 2017

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' due to systematic judicial malfeasance employescasecanada.ca (32 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. senior teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 14 different court systems and over 50 judges. No compensation has been paid (includes pension rights which are held up as further blackmail  for 10 years now). This series is now re- directed from POTUS  Mr. D. Trump whose statement 'the U.S. Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world' is echoed here in Canada by the Employees Case under B.C.'s imposed BILL 35 which has revealed similar dry-rot in the Canadian Judiciary, particularly as it relates to its moribund oversight bodies including the executive powers of the P.M; now 'Ambassador Trudeau'.  Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind 'uber' story (external attack from an unexpected source) of the century.  This current challenge is to this Employer precedent setting theme from the Employee's Case: 'If you do not accept what we offer in compensation for lay-off; you will get nothing at all' (The WV School Trustee's 'Final Solution'); a position supported by over 50 judges (including the Supreme Court of Canada on 4 occasions and sanctioned by an indolent Prime Minister. Today's Newsletter  reflects my reaction to NS 458698 (Apr.06) in which the NS inhabitants lost their government, their courts and their self respect and now join the failed provinces of QC & SK with 'Hood law' which, in essence, is no law at all. Read on.

Wha' happened? (hit by a M.O.A.B.)

1) That is best explained with this analogy: A skipper of the SS Hood (Halifax NS Registry) was blinded by an oncoming light. We have the right of way, he blazoned to the signal man; order them to turn 10 degrees starboard, which the latter did. The response came back; no, you turn 10 degrees port. I am a vice-admiral he bellowed in return, turn 10 degrees starboard! And I am a seaman third class, and I say 10 degrees port. By this time the brass buttons were popping off his tunic; ...I am a battleship and I say turn 10 degrees starboard...SIR! ...And I am a lighthouse...your choice

2) One would think that 'Skipper Premier McNeil, a Maritimer, would be 'once bitten; twice shy' but I see no evidence of that learning curve here.

3) In 1985, I caught an administrator red handed in doctoring my professional teacher's Report by changing it from a positive to a negative of which evidence I mailed to the B.C. Deputy Education Minister (whom just happened to be the former principal of this high school).

4) Justice was quick with the creation of the imposed BILL 35 to hi-jack the government and co-opt the judiciary (gerrymandered arbitrator appointment) to approve a sweetheart  deal between the West Vancouver School Board and local Union leaders in order to shoot this whistleblower.

5) Fast forward to Halifax on April 06-2017 in the courtroom of Suzanne Hood j. who merely assigned 'costs' for unstated reasons. In brief, this target was to pay $15,000 to the rogue B.C. Harris & Co. 'because they asked for it'. That innocuous action vaporized not only the Justice System of Nova Scotia but that of the entire country as it incontrovertibly  linked - for a first time - the courts to this government conspiracy similar to the original administrator in this saga. That's why 'being hooded' applies to every losing litigant in a court case across Canada.

6) To be sure, vaporizing this case happened in the failed states of Quebec and Saskatchewan as evidenced by the Supreme Court of Canada in both instances plus P.M. Trudeau and his executive powers, doing nothing. But that is the point...they did not act. Hood j. did.

7) To be sure the above would not have happened if the NS courts had held a voir dire where, among other things, a demand for the Employer to hire NS counsel bound by NS laws and not those of B.C. such as is the case for Harris & Co. As matters stand, the caption reads: Harris & Co. 'tail' wags NS judicial 'dog'.

What's really happening

8) The WV School Board Employer cannot get another legal firm. Their case will collapse of its own weight as no matter how hungry a legal firm is, they won't take this case anywhere in Canada. Hicks, Morley, et al dropped their representation in Ontario with Lavery de Billy finding it much easier to just turn the entire Quebec justice system on its head.

9) While those courts above assigned costs to them to be paid by me; I have never received an invoice. Who paid? Big legal outfits don't work for nothing. The WVSB did not respond to my letter on this level nor did the 'fiscally responsible' North Shore News anti-employee editor see fit to investigate.

10) Wha' happened? Initially, the Employer was able to blackmail the court in 1985 due to an egregious error by Justice Southin regarding disclosure. Today the hunters have become the hunted and the grey eminence (Old Boy's Club) is telling this Employer what they have to do including paying out court debt not of their responsibility. It is the conspiracy of the century which has taken out government, courts and the anti-employee media. As for politicians... don't even ask.

11) A new NS constitutional question action is being lodged listing the B.C. Union as defendant which does not have access to the corrupted Employer factum used in 3 provinces - QC,SK, NS.