JUMP TO HOME PAGE

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MARCH 01-2016

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

 

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employescasecanada.ca (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' teacher lay-off) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 10 different court systems and over 40 judges. This edition is focused on being ubered (external threat from an unexpected source) through the interlocked legal proceedings from different courts across Canada. For example, recently the Employer filed a 'Motion to Dismiss' in both QC and SK Courts. In QC, the Motion to Dismiss was heard first without any recognition to my factum which had not received a docket number leaving me to defend a negative which is an impossibility. That matter is now in front of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCofC). In brief, the court never entertained the amazing fact that two, not one judge officiated at the lower Gatineau Court; the second judge writing the Decision without any recognition of the existence of the first judge. 'Cover-up by any other name.' Thus it was with some surprise that a similar stunt was not pulled in SK where both my original action and the Motion to Dismiss were to be held at the same time. I was further surprised to be told that I would speak first as the Motion to Dismiss usually takes precedence. That surprise turned to shock when in disagreement with the lead judge on 'jurisdiction'; I requested the opinion of the other two. She forbad them to speak. It further turned out that the Employer's lawyer by prior agreement would not speak either. For example, I asked him whether the Employer owes me compensation; the key question in this trial. She would not permit him to speak other than to costs which she assigned to him.  In effect, she made the court fully responsible for the Employer's argument. That is the basis for my request for the removal of these three judges along with the Chief Justice of the SK Appeal Court. That piece of perfidy is now in the hands of the Supreme Court of Canada.The point to be made here is that the 'grey eminence' is only experienced with arranging proceedings in a linear fashion. The Employee's Case has led to bungling on an unimaginable scale with inter-court finagling and is the source of the following letter.

 

 

SK COURT OF APPEAL CACV2783 entire judgment (apart from costs which was longer than the decision) (1) The appeal of Roger Callow, against the decision of Megaw J. in Callow v West Vancouver School District No 45, 2015, is dismissed for the reasons set out in that decision.

 

TO: The  Legal Society of Saskatchewan

FROM: Roger Callow  CACV2783 (SK Appeal Court H.D. Feb. 09-2016)

MESSAGE:

1) The SK Legal Society was the one and only oversight body in the 30 year history of the unresolved Employee's Case to acknowledge the seriousness of judicial excesses in this case.

2) On your own volition, you forwarded material sent to you by this writer to the B.C. Law Society accusing B.C.'s Harris & Co. of seeking to perpetuate a fraud in SK Courts.

3) While the 'crime' was committed in SK courts, due to Harris & Co. being domiciled in B.C., jurisdiction over them fell to the B.C Legal Society.

4) The B.C. Legal Society asked the proper question; namely, how does the court account for the duality and duplicity of the Ontario Superior Court's McKinnon j. frivolous and vexatious Order (14-59060) which has two versions; one published April 23-2014 with the second published September 15-2014 without any reference to the original Order?

5) With the first version being the focus of the courts in Quebec and the second being provided in SK Courts, the allegation here is that Harris & Co. was seeking to inveigle the court system into sanctioning both versions realizing that there is no legal vehicle between provinces to question such perfidy.

6) Megaw j. was made well aware of that dichotomy by me in court. By dropping any reference to frivolous & vexatious action by this plaintiff in the Appeal, Harris & Co. plus by not speaking in court by pre-arrangement with the Appeal Court, they sought to bury any reference to this charge which loomed large in my factum.

7) Unlike Quebec where the Employer perfidy was so-called hidden behind an Order to Dismiss where only that Order was considered (how can the QC Appeal Court dismiss something which did not exist; namely my factum which had yet to be given a docket number so that there is no recognition of any activity in the Judicial Record?)

8) Defending a negative is an impossibility and the fact that the above happened leaves the Couillard government in tatters where Quebecers have only the streets to turn to for justice.

That is the nature of the SCofC challenge now before the courts. In brief, I am still awaiting the judgment of the original Gatineau judge in the lower court; the only judge with the vested authority to write one.

9) The SK Appeal Court 'one-liner' is equally devastating for the Premier Wall government as it too, leaves citizens in SK nowhere to turn for justice.

10) By accepting responsibility for both the 'Order to Dismiss' and one and at the same time, the 'Original factum'; this Appeal Court covered up the cover-up of Megaw j which, in turn is a cover-up of the Harris &Co. cover-up of the duplicitous McKinnon j. frivolous & vexatious Order. (There ought to be a Nobel Prize for that kind of performance!) I have called for the removal of these 3 Appeal Court judges along with the SK Appeal Court Chief Justice in this matter.

11) This matter has now been directed to the Supreme Court of Canada necessitating my earlier request to the SK Legal Society to fill in the gap left by the B.C. Legal Society regarding the legitimacy of the McKinnon Order(s) and the actions of Harris & Co. thereto.

12) That evaluation is an important element in the SCofC case. Will the SK Legal Society 'fold' under that challenge as they should have replied before now?

13) A copy of this letter is being sent to P.M. Trudeau where time is running out for him to assert his hegemony by firing SCofC Chief Justice Hon. B. McLachlin for her machinations as President of the Canadian Judicial Council. He has the power to call in the RCMPP (Royal Canadian Mounted Political Police) to seize the necessary Disclosure for which both Megaw j and the SK Appeal Court failed to call for. Without that disclosure, no court may make any legal argument in this 'castle built on stand' story.

 

ACTION REQUESTED

 

FOR THE SK LEGAL SOCIETY TO CONDUCT THEIR OWN EVALUATION (IN LIGHT OF THE FAILURE OF THE B.C. LEGAL SOCIETY TO DO SO) OF THE DUPLICITY OF B.C.'S HARRIS & CO. (AS SUPPORTED BY THE SK COURTS) IN ORDER THAT THEIR REPORT MAY BE ADDED TO THE SCofC APPEAL CURRENTLY ON FILE.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow

'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System'

 

B.C. TEACHER ALERT

 

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' MARCH-2016  www.employescasecanada.ca (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' teacher lay-off) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 10 different court systems and over 40 judges. This edition is focused on acquiring the all important disclosure from the Union which has a copy of the 'memo notes' from the 1985 School Board June meetings regarding the illicit lay-off of senior West Vancouver teacher, Roger Callow, under the imposed B.C. government's BILL 35. Without a court resolution, no compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid. The WVTA (read that the legal Department of the BCTF with lawyer Bruce Laughton QC) has in recent years joined with the Employer to deny Callow that vital information. Every BCTF President since 1985 is privy to that dirty little secret. (Get a new Union?...CUPE?)

 

QUOTE: True Justice Robert K. Tanenbaum
'Well, basically, the system, not just this office, but every prosecutorial organization, is essentially corrupt. It's so easy to pass laws, politicians love to pass laws...we're so overloaded that we can't actually do what we're supposed to do. So we perform an imitation of justice...because moving the system along becomes the prime value, not making sure that the laws are carried out. Get it?...and the corruption you get from power is an order of magnitude more serious than the kind you get from what I was talking about, the necessity for pretense. Because it's personal...They don't teach this in law school, do they?'
'No...So gradually things will improve?'
'No', said Karp sourly. 'Things will get worse. But we'll fight it all the way down'

 

MESSAGE:

1) An Action has been laid against the WVTA / BCTF in Prince Edward Island solely to obtain those aforementioned court disclosure documents in the above case which, as a Union member, belong to me as a matter of right.

2) Why P.E.I.? Two reasons: a) The B.C. Courts will only recognize the Union representing  my rights being fully cognizant that I face a 'sweetheart deal' between Employer and Union.

b) As a small province, the entire Island will know if the 'grey eminence' (see 2015 web site) in the form of a senior law partner has backdoor access to the Office of the Chief Justice as has happened with the Employer in other provinces. Two applications (Quebec & Saskatchewan) to the Supreme Court of Canada and oversight bodies including the Office of the Prime Minister are currently on file for gross judicial machinations. (see web)

3) Should the Union decide to be represented by Bruce Laughton QC (since 1986) as opposed to hiring local PEI representation as does the Employer in some other provinces, I will expand the action to claim $5 million dollars for Union culpability.

4) At one time, Laughton, the junior associated with Harry Rankin represented this case but - contrary to legal ethics - continued to represent only the Union after I had selected a new lawyer, dismissing him in that process. Federal Court T2360-14 details his alleged fraudulent perfidy along with the legal Department of the BCTF. He later joined legal forces with the Employer to thwart any of my Ottawa lawyer's attempts at settlement.

5) Of course, should the B.C. teachers at large form pressure groups to force the Union to turn over this disclosure, I will drop this action. The time to act is now, not later. All collective bargaining clients in Canada deserve as much. How would you like this type of victimization?

(Don't bother wasting your time contacting your MPP or MP or anti-employee media source.)

 

POST IN STAFFROOM

 

March 02-2016

 

TO: Harris & Co.                                         FROM: Roger Callow 

ATTN: G. Litherland esq.                                        Ottawa, ON K1V 9A7

14th Floor Bentall 5                                                Plaintiff SK CACV2783

550 Burrard Street,                                                

Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2B5                                                 

Respondent (West Vancouver

School Trustees) 

f. 604-684-6632  sent by fax  4 pages

QUOTES:

A) 'Forgive us our sins, for what we have done, and what we have failed to do'

B) 'The law's a farce, sonnyboy. You can plant evidence and suborn witnesses and make sweetheart deals with the prosecution. The only laws we're really interested in making stick are the laws of contract - because if commerce doesn't work we're eating tree bark instead of bread.' Cassidy Morris West

C) 'What needs we fear it, for who can call us to account?'  Lady MacBeth

D) 'The curse of modern democracies is their lack of disclosure'Outlawed Canadian'

 

TOPIC: 'Sureties' and other irregular legal actions.

MESSAGE:

1) Acknowledgment of your transmission dated March 18-2016 received on March 02-2016 is made. Why, are you broke? At any rate, consider this letter as the acknowledgment of your request.

2) Apparently your request to forego signing such an acknowledgment form in court was not fulfilled which, no doubt, accounts for this request to acknowledge the service of the court decision; (or what passes for a court decision) as they merely rubber stamped the highly contentious lower court decision of Megaw j. and ignored the discussion on inherent jurisdiction which I had only with Jackson j. as she barred the other two judges from speaking as well as yourself (by pre-arrangement before the court commenced). That is why I called for the removal of these 3 judges plus the Chief Justice for a flagrant abuse of the court processes.

3) The Megaw j. decision was branded contentious as key disclosure on which all legalities are predicated was not entered in court nor called for as I insisted.  Hence his ruling on Inherent jurisdiction which the Appeal Court rubber-stamped is 'still-born'. The extant Supreme Court of Canada Appeal, therefore, is in essence, a challenge to the cover-up of a cover-up.

4) The court of Megaw j. and Jackson et al j. were further remiss in not dealing with the constitutional question as to the ultra vires nature of B.C.'s BILL 35, a piece of imposed legislation and its connection to statute law such as the collective bargaining rules. That question is of national importance but completely ignored by both courts; no doubt in a bid to keep the 'judicial record' clear of any impediments which would 'taint' precedent law - if that is possible. That level of legal casuistry, in the larger context, is what I have called on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to act if he is to save individual rights on which our democracy is based. PLACARD: WHAT THE FATHER WOULD CREATE / THE SON WOULD DESTROY

5) As another example of court perfidy, the Respondent was not permitted to reply as to whether or not they owed any compensation in this 30 year unresolved case; a legal question of immense proportions here.

6) Underlying all these legalities is the abysmal  court failure on both levels to accept that this plaintiff was expelled from B.C. courts in 2013 for 'reasons best known to a judge' (Cullen Creed). That is the starting point for any legal discussion of any description including inherent jurisdiction. Added to this dismal judicial record was the failure of first, the B.C. Law Society and now, the SK Law Society to let you get away with 'judicial murder' in terms of the fraudulent McKinnon j. (Ontario Supreme Court) duplicitous Orders. All these matters have now been referred to the Supreme Court of Canada with much embarrassment to the government of Premier Brad Wall.

 

Sureties

7) The concept of a surety is for a litigant to post a bond with the court for possible future payment where required. It is NOT intended for one litigant to use this legal mechanism as a means of diminishing the credibility of the opposition which I submit has been the case here and in an earlier such request in B.C.  In the case of SK, Ottenbreit j. turned these rules on sureties on their head by declaring the matter a 'special case'. There was little I could do under the circumstances but pay this danegeld in order for the Appeal Case to be heard for which I spent 8 hours under the terms of 'perfection' indexing the Respondent's largely useless billable time material. The Respondent further bandied claims of so-called un-paid bills to the court hearing for which he produced no evidence. For example, I stated that I do not have any unpaid legal bills excepting those currently on appeal. The Respondent orally claimed an unpaid bill of $22,000 for Ontario (where the Employer lost their representative for judicial chicanery) which I had never seen. A letter to the Employer regarding this so-called payment of this amount did not receive a response.

8) A similar surety stunt was pulled in B.C. which I paid in order for an Appeal Court Case to proceed. It never did as it was cancelled in 2010 for reasons best known to a judge (A. MacKenzie Creed). To add insult to injury, K.C. MacKenzie (no relation) of the B.C. Appeal Court had called the hearing on December 22 (even the Supreme Court of Canada claims that Xmas holiday time is not to be included in dating orders) with the final decision and amount reported to me by the Employer in mid-January after  the due date for payment. However, I had learned from other sources of the charge and paid within the time frame. When the Employer and Union (the B.C. courts claimed only the Union could represent my interests in B.C.) in this obvious 'sweetheart deal' joined forces to make a partial claim on this fund; I attempted a futile objection to the Supreme Court of Canada due to my non-legal standing in B.C. As the remaining funds are frozen to me (as I may not make any application to retrieve the remainder), I requested that Ottenbreit j. include these funds should he rule in the favour of the Respondent. He refused.

 

CONCLUSION

9) That the above shenanigans are the exception is not, regrettably, the case as evidenced by the tremendous appeal of Republican presidential leadership candidate, Donald Trump, whom is calling the establishment to task for 'what they have failed to do.' in the U.S.  In Canada, that task now falls to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau or a future Prime Minister in the Employee's Case(Canada). Not responding to this legal filibustering is not an option as I outline to Mr. Trudeau in my March 07-2016 Newsletter.

PLACARD: COVER-UP  1) NIXON RESIGNED  2) TRUDEAU  (?)

10) Thus what is seen in the microcosm with Canada's judicial treatment in the Employee's case, is seen in the macrocosm of Canada's relation to any external matter  beyond our borders. As Canada no longer deserves a birthday, I have christened July 1 henceforth to be known as 'Anti-Judge Day'.

 

Yours truly

 

Roger Callow  'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System'

 

cc  P.M. Trudeau / Premier B. Wall / SCofC  L. Lebel  / RCMP / SK Legal Society

 

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MARCH 14-2016

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System'

www.employescasecanada.ca (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. teacher lay-off in 1985 where no compensation has been paid-includes pension rights) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 10 different court systems and over 40 judges. The Canadian Justice System has been ubered (external threat from an unexpected source) through the interlocked legal proceedings from different courts across Canada. In a letter to Prime Minister Trudeau (SEE web P.M. Harper now P.M. Trudeau) March 07-2016; I note:  1) Count the cost of your inactivity on the Employee's Case to date: Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice B. McLachlin is the de facto CEO of Canada, not you.  2) Remove SCofC Chief Justice McLachlin for dereliction of duty and appoint a new Chief Justice with an aim to removing Chief Justices and Justices whom have exceeded their authority in the Employee's Case. That move would go a long way to relieving the stranglehold that the 'grey eminence' has with his backdoor entrance to the Offices of the Chief Justices across the land. Many honest judges and court workers would bless you for that one alone which is a pattern which could be applied to other 'out of control' bureaucracies. (N.B. Canadian judges, unlike American judges, are appointed rather than being elected)

QUOTES:
A) 'Well, basically, the system, not just this office, but every prosecutorial organization, is essentially corrupt. It's so easy to pass laws, politicians love to pass laws...we're so overloaded that we can't actually do what we're supposed to do. So we perform an imitation of justice...because moving the system along becomes the prime value, not making sure that the laws are carried out. Get it?...and the corruption you get from power is an order of magnitude more serious than the kind you get from what I was talking about, the necessity for pretense. Because it's personal...They don't teach this in law school, do they?'
'No...So gradually things will improve?' 'No', said Karp sourly. 'Things will get worse. But we'll fight it all the way down'
True Justice Robert K. Tanenbaum

B) 'The law's a farce, sonnyboy. You can plant evidence and suborn witnesses and make sweetheart deals with the prosecution. The only laws we're really interested in making stick are the laws of contract - because if commerce doesn't work we're eating tree bark instead of bread.' Cassidy Morris West

C) 'What needs we fear it, for who can call us to account?'  Lady MacBeth

LETTER TO GOP CANDIDATE, MR. D. TRUMP

http://www.employeescasecanada.com/humpty.jpg1) Forgive the paltry sum I enclose for your campaign fund but I have to conserve my limited funds to fight the  biggest judicial fraud in Canada's legal history due to systematical judicial abuse. The story is so big that the highly centralized Canadian media (which is not very kind to you) prohibit any reporting on it. P.S. Don't be surprised to see my Canadian contribution discounted by 25% in a U.S. bank reflective of these protest PLACARDS:  a) BEHIND EVERY ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IS A MORAL COLLAPSE

b) CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM BROKE YET PLENTY FIXED AS IT IS.

2) Don't be too hasty about not building a wall on the U.S.-Canadian border as a political dispute has broken out between the incumbent Liberals and their Tory predecessors over jailing terrorists. In brief, the media is alarmed about the Liberal release of some terrorists.

3) Should you know a pulitzer prize seeking writer, please forward this account to him/her. Perhaps your Canadian friend, Conrad Black, can assist you in that search.

Good Luck in your candidacy.   

 

Yours truly

'The Outlawed Canadian in an outlaw Justice System (Roger Callow)

 

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MARCH 15-2016 - 4 pages

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employescasecanada.ca (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 10 different court systems and over 40 judges. No compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid. This edition is focused on being ubered (external threat from an unexpected source) through the interlocked legal proceedings from different courts across Canada. Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind story of the century.

 

QUOTES: (The sad state of Canadian democracy or 'rule of law')

A) '...In the global cause of the sacred democratic values we all claim to cherish so dearly, Canada has nothing to boast about. Nothing at all.' O.C. columnist, Terry Glavin March 14-2016

B) '...It reminds us of the very current reality that it is terrifyingly easy for the state to find scapegoats and condemn them to torture....' O.C. columnist, Kate Heartfield March 14-2016

C) '...More than that, he absolutely hates experts...are the key to the entire scam.... (parallel= the reams of precedents from case law which are 95% of the time 'legal billable time bullshit')

'...All I do know is this country may have lost its capacity for outrage, but I haven't....But I don't have your anger about the way the world is going, she responded, and I'm not strong enough to change such things even if I did....' High Plains Tango  R.J. Waller

D) '...The senator had to escape Ottawa and its "speeches, the endless posturing, the cynical scheming, the swollen egos, the arrogant aides, the merciless media, the stifling minutiae, the scientific bureaucracy, the microscopic betterment of humanity"....' The High Mountains of Portugal  Yan Martel

E) '...Isn't that odd? Isn't it maddening that a fully functioning democracy such as ours would be content to just abandon the matter? (topic irrelevant here for this point) Can you imagine such a subject being dropped cold in the United Kingdom or the United States or any other nation of the western world for that matter?  former P.M. Paul Martin (2002-06) political advisor, Scott Reid

F) '...Thinking there had to be some mistake I contacted the Discipline Committee of Professional Engineers (Ontario) and asked a few simple questions....Was there a publication ban? ...Would they provide me with a copy of the ban?...Were reasons for the ban issued?... etc.etc...I was given the brush-off. None of my questions were answered....Ottawa Sun legal columnist Alan Shanoff March 13-16 p.14

G) '  "Let's put everything behind us" seems to be France's cry. "Everything-the war, the Vichy, the Milice, Drancy, the Jews - it's all over now. After all, everyone suffered, not just you." In the face of this institutional amnesia, she writes, the only help is talking with fellow survivors....'  The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society   Mary Ann Shaffer & Annie Barrows

H) If a tree does NOT fall in the middle of the Quebec kafkaesque judicial forest, does it make a sound to 90,000 Frenchmen (or equivalent number of QC judges) whom can't be wrong? Absolutely. The hearing judge in the lower court did not write a decision and the Appeal Court did not assign a docket number to this plaintiff hence the Appeal Court rejected a case which did not exist in the first place...way to go, judicial bozos! That has to be a first, even for Canada.

8) PROTEST PLACARD: IMPEACH SCofC CHIEF JUSTICE BEVERLEY MCLACHLIN (personally involved in the Employee's Case through different functions)

 

LETTER TO Supreme Court of Canada Registry clerk, Sylvie  Bédard  Mar.15-2016

 

1) Acknowledgment of your letter of March 04-2016 received March 08-16 assigning a docket number (36883) contesting legal events in Quebec is made.

2) Included in your letter: 'A motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument (original plus 5 copies).  If you visited my website noted above; I am sure the term 'lengthy' would be justifiably omitted considering the number of judicial excesses for which I hold the Justice System of Canada accountable due largely to the failure of a number of Appeal Courts to conduct 'due process' and the subsequent failure of oversight bodies to respond accordingly to that shortcoming in this unresolved labour case, including Parliament. This writer labels that failure as systematic judicial abuse explaining why all correspondence now goes directly to Prime Minister Trudeau of whom I have outlined options which he may choose to follow. Doing nothing is not one of those options.

 

BACKGROUND

 

3) In 1986, B.C. Supreme Court Justice, Mary Southin, quashed the arbitration dealing with the lay-off of senior West Vancouver ,B.C. High School teacher, Roger Callow, under the auspices of the neophyte imposed BILL 35 dealing with lay-off for economic reasons, leaving this writer in what turns out to be a 30 year state of limbo. She had called for all meeting notes from the School Board dealing with this lay-off in June of 1985 (BILL 35 became operant on July 01-1985) only to later return them to the Employer and the Union representative because 'she did not use them'.

4)These are the 'missing memo notes' referred to in this writer's 30 year unsuccessful bid to obtain under the terms of disclosure. Indeed, the action in Quebec was limited to only obtaining this all-important disclosure.

5) It is those notes, it is submitted here, which would permit this plaintiff to lay a criminal fraud case against the perpetrators.

6) To date, actions against the Employer in B.C. Courts, the Supreme Court of Canada (rejected for a hearing on two accounts), Federal Court, Ontario courts, Quebec courts, and Saskatchewan courts to obtain this disclosure which is the necessary background to any legal discussion of this case, have been thwarted by the courts for superficial reasons:

a) frivolous and vexatious proceedings  (a badly over-worked term in our courts of law) The essence of any court is its finality. As there is no judicial finding, this case remains unresolved and , as such , can hardly be considered frivolous as asserted by this litigant in the Preamble to the Supreme Court of Canada 2004

b) inherent jurisdiction The conditions outlined in all legal venues are not constrained to only handling questions directly related to that particular venue. Otherwise, foreign interests (including, as in this case, the province of B.C.) would be greatly limited in sponsoring actions in Canada. Further, it needs be noted that the question of jurisdiction does not arise for the SCofC as that body encompasses all legal venues in Canada...once a litigant has surpassed the hurdles of the lower courts which are many as attested to by this case. With the  'Cullen Creed' of July 2013, B.C. Associate Chief Justice Supreme Court's A. Cullen, expelled this litigant from B.C. Courts thus truncating any SCofC Appeal. He acted 'for reasons best known to the judge' in this highly capricious action which omitted the customary 'may proceed only with the permission of a judge' in this unresolved case. No court to date will acknowledge his actions without which all proceedings flow bringing into question any judgment in this case.

c) natural justice This plaintiff has a right to request disclosure which all courts fail abysmally to acknowledge hence impinging on the central notion of a fair judicial hearing. That term is not 'laughable' as stated by one Saskatchewan judge in this case.

d) transference If the courts of one venue believe, as does this writer, that B.C. is the proper venue to hear this matter, then they may refer the matter through their terms of transference in order that the case is indeed handled in a designated forum.

7) The pattern emerging from the above challenge to the Employer is one in which a 'grey eminence' with back-door access to the Office of the Chief Justice is able to gerrymander 'compliant' judicial appointments to this case as evidenced as early as the quashed arbitration in 1986 in which the arbitrator had been ruled 'patently unreasonable'. (He had converted 16 new hires to read 16 lay-offs with Mr. Callow to be the necessary 17th under BILL 35 with the full knowledge that only Mr. Callow was laid off in June of 1985.)

8) It is this dismal story of cover-up heaped on top of cover-up which has destroyed the Canadian Justice System and hence Canadian democracy. At root of this failure is one in which 'disclosure' is not taken seriously by the courts.

9) Be that as it may, two applications - from Quebec and Saskatchewan - are currently being appealed to the SCofC on what is essentially the question of disclosure due to the failure of the lower courts to address this plateau question.

10) Currently, an action is being finalized in Prince Edward Island to obtain the Union's copy of that disclosure which, it is maintained here, is my right as a Union client.

11) In its final analysis, our legal system is heavily dependent on precedent law plus accompanying regulations based on legal cases  as reflected in the 'judicial record'. The Employee's Case demonstrates just how badly flawed is this system which is routinely undermined by legal authorities so bent on doing so. The Prime Minister is the only one under his executive powers to put an end to this judicial nonsense. To date P.M. Justin Trudeau has not seen fit to do anything. It's a good case for the application of the 'notwithstanding clause' of the constitution.

12) In the event that the Employer and Union willingly divulge  such disclosure, a new direction to this case could be taken making all current actions redundant. Why should this litigant, it needs be asked, finance an investigation into judicial wrongdoing which - while being of paramount concern to this country at large - does nothing to forward my cause of a financial conclusion which is the basis of the law on salary agreements?

 

PRELIMINARY ACTION REQUESTED

 

13) At this time, Sylvie Bédard, I will withhold my dirge of material for the court until the court:

a) Provides me with the aforementioned 'disclosure' through a court order. Of course, the Respondent could remove this necessity by providing me with said disclosure.

b) A corollary  is to place this litigant back on salary as I should never have been dropped until this case was resolved. This 'deferred salary' (approx. 30 years with compounded interest) belongs to me apart from any judicial findings. Such an award would provide me with the necessary leverage to reach a final accommodation with the Employer. Currently, my unprejudiced out-of court settlement offer is for $10,000,000 dollars discounted to $7,000,000 if resolved by March 31-2016.

 

Please respond to the above request before March 25-2016. Thank-you.

 

Yours truly,

 

Roger Callow (plaintiff) SCofC File No. 36883

 

cc P.M. Trudeau

RCMP (Montreal Fraud Division)

West Vancouver, B.C. School Trustees (by fax - 4 pages)

WVTA/BCTF Union (by fax - 4 pages)

Washington Post (where's Donald Trump now that Canada needs him most?)

 

CANADA'S CORRUPTOCRACY - MARCH 27-2016 

JUDICIAL LIES PILED ON TOP OF JUDICIAL LIES = CASE LAW for the Employee's Case(Canada)

BY: Roger Callow ‘The Outlawed Canadian’ in an 'Outlaw Justice System' www.employescasecanada.ca (30 year unresolved 'standing case' legal matter in 'illicit' West Vancouver, B.C. teacher lay-off in 1985) now known judicially as ‘the cluster-fuck case’ which has been through 10 different court systems and over 40 judges. No compensation (includes pension rights) has been paid. Currently there are two SCofC hearings slated (QC & SK) with a pending hearing in P.E.I. This edition is focused on being ubered (external threat from an unexpected source) through the interlocked legal proceedings from different courts across Canada. Pulitzer Prize seeking writer is sought in this one-of-a-kind story of the century.

 

WALKING BACK THE CAT - A REVIEW OF THIS GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY

 

1) In March of 1985, I mailed allegedly fraudulent material to the Department of Education under former West Vancouver Secondary Principal, Jim Carter, the incumbent Deputy Minister.

2) John Williams, a teacher under him and his successor, wrote two conflicting professional reports on this target - one positive and one negative - and chose to file the negative one. I caught him in that process.

3) Carter was exposed to the extent that 7 years previously, he dismissed a senior teacher at West Vancouver Secondary School for alleged incompetence based on the obligatory 3 consecutive negative reports over 2 years. Carter had been later successfully sued in this high profile case by the teacher but employment was not returned to him. Carter could ill-afford a second debacle. SEE web ORIGINS .

4) Former Presidents of the local Union also teaching in West Vancouver Secondary School were not only concerned about the plight of their fellow colleague,Williams, but the fact that if it were shown that professional reports on teachers were being 'kited'; not only would the confidence of teachers at large be shaken, but also administrators whom contributed 20% to Union coffers through their membership with which they were growing increasingly restive. (The teachers and administrators were separated by B.C. legislation in 1988 in any event.)

5) The answer to this conundrum? ...the imposed BILL 35 designed to lay-off teachers ostensibly for economic reasons which became effective on July 01-1985. (My lay-off letter was dated June 28-1985.) In brief, the conspirators could not wait 2 years to railroad 2 more negative Professional Reports considering my accusations.

6) The local Union leaders plus the Superintendent, whom had earlier hired Carter as principal, persuaded the School Trustees to support this dismissal on the grounds that the imposed nature of BILL 35 meant that the Union was not involved as the conditions of BILL 35 would pre-dominate wherein I would have to foot the bill for a 11 day arbitration (in which the Union took only a 1/2 hour) which I could ill-afford...a slam dunk for these conspirators... or so they thought.

7) The parent Union, the BCTF, which had promulgated a province-wide campaign against BILL 35 due to its pejorative nature, talked all School Districts planning to make use of BILL 35 (about 6) to decline but left the one in West Vancouver in place. Further, realizing that they would be badly exposed if the Union did not defend my case, the BCTF  told the local Union that they would pay for the expensive arbitration.

8) Hence it was an arbitration that I was meant to lose and the arbitrator picked up all the necessary signals from the legal counsel. The key, of course, was to place the School Trustees on the stand to attest to lay-off numbers. Neither the Board nor the Union's lawyers would do that nor was the government-appointed arbitrator asking for such key testimony. Hence he felt secure in turning 16 new hires into 16 lay-offs adding my name as the necessary 17th knowing full well that I was the only lay-off In June of 1985.

9) I changed lawyers and appealed the matter to B.C. Supreme Court before Justice Mary Southin in 1986. She quashed the arbitration ruling, as she did, the arbitrator to be 'patently unreasonable'. The bottom line for me over the next 30 years?...to be left in limbo.

10) There was much litigation in the intervening years culminating in the second failed application to the SCofC in 2004 under the terms of 'ultimate remedy' reflective of the fact that for a Justice System to have any credibility, it must be devoted to finality; in this case, compensation - in whatever amount - must be paid. That's when Canada reverted to being a Third World country.

11) In 2013, the B.C. courts, fed up with this long running soap opera and my bid to  get compensation (now includes pension rights), expelled me from the province - for reasons best known to a judge (the Cullen Creed) - forcing me into other legal venues.

12) That latter process has exposed the Justice System in a way that it has never been exposed before; specifically in terms of a 'grey eminence' (see old web site) whom has back door entrance to the Office of the Chief Justice and his minions appointed to get a desired result. The Appeal Courts are particularly bad in this respect including, as we have seen above, the SCofC under the aegis of Chief Justice B. McLachlin whose personal role looms large in this case.

13) There isn't a day goes by that the media does not report on the ineffectiveness of Canada's oversight bodies including Parliament. The Canadian Judicial Council, under President B. McLachlin, for example, has never acknowledged the many documented complaints against judges that I have made.

14) The past 30 years has been devoted to acquiring the 'missing memo notes' regarding those School Board meetings in June of 1985. Southin j. returned them to the Employer and Union because, as she stated, she did not use them. The Respondent Employer and Union plus courts steadfastly refuse to hand over those notes to me. Without that necessary disclosure, no hearing has any validity. The SCofC is finally willing to hear this case which, I have informed them, must be preceded by this disclosure. The current action in P.E.I. is to obtain the Union's copy of this  disclosure which, as a Union client, I claim ownership.

15) In broader parameters, the conflict is between who is the CEO of Canada...SCofC Chief Justice B. McLachlin or Prime Minister Justin Trudeau whom believes, to date, that doing nothing is an option. If so, it not only marks his legacy as P.M. but sinks 21st century Canada into an abyss from which there is no recovery as a democracy.

16) Already the careers of Premier Couillard in QC and Brad Wall in SK are severely challenged as both have been kept fully informed as to gross  judicial peccadilloes in their province. The legal alternative for citizens in both provinces? ...turning to the streets. Voters may also take note:

 

be ethical - don't vote